In this phenomenological study, we explored women music teacher educators’ experiences navigating gender bias in academia. Our research questions were: (1) How do participants describe their experiences in academia? and (2) How do age, rank, experience, geographic region, or school type/size impact their descriptions of their experiences with gender bias and marginalization in academia? We explored the experiences of eight participants in varied stages of their careers (assistant, associate, full professor ranks), concentration areas (chorus, general, instrumental), and schools and locations throughout the United States. Analysis of the data revealed two overarching themes. The first theme, socialization, included four subthemes: (a) socialized gender expectations in the workplace and in their personal lives; (b) gendered service expectations; (c) faculty life, including students’ expectations of their professors; and (d) family life, including unsupportive institutional policies related to maternity leave and childcare. The second theme, coping strategies, included how tenure protections empowered participants to advocate for themselves and others. Developing coalitions with other women colleagues also was impactful. Recommendations for further research and suggestions for practice are discussed.
BeckM.CadwellJ.KernA.WuK.DickersonM.HowardM. (2022). Critical feminist analysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta-synthesis of the existing literature. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12729
3.
BernardH.RyanG. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage.
4.
BettisP.PriceP. G.BenjaminC. P.HanE. J. (2020). Gender ideology, socialization, and culture. In NaplesN. A. (Ed.), Companion to women’s and gender studies (pp. 213–234). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/978119315063.ch11
5.
BirdS. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x
6.
BoyleP.BoiceB. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183225886
7.
CorrellS. J.BernardS.PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10/1086/511799
8.
De WeldeK.StepnickA. (2023). Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education.Stylus Pub. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444299
9.
DeanL.ChurchillB.RuppannerL. (2021). The mental load: Building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers. Community, Work & Family, 25(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.2002813
10.
FassingerR. E. (2008). Workplace diversity and public policy: Challenges and opportunities for psychology. American Psychologist, 63(4), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.63.4.252
11.
FitzpatrickK.SweetB. (2023). Motherhood in the music academy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 71(44), 373–397. https://doi.org.10.1177/00224294231154277
12.
GadboisS.GrahamE. (2012). New faculty perceptions of supervision and mentoring: The influence of graduate school experiences. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 5, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v
13.
GarveyC. M.JonesR. (2021). Is there a place for theoretical frameworks in qualitative research?International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987959
14.
GillM. J. (2020). Phenomenology as qualitative methodology. In Mik-MeyerN.JärvinenM. (Eds.), Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences (pp. 73–94). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714333.n28
15.
GreenL. (2017). Gender identity, musical experience and schooling. In WrightR. (Ed.), Sociology and music education (pp. 161–176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090887-7
16.
HarperE. P.BaldwinR. G.GansnederB. G.ChronisterJ. L. (2001). Full-time women faculty off the tenure track: Profile and practice. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 237–257. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0003
17.
HeideggerM. (1999). Ontology: Hermeneutics of facticity (van BurenJ. Trans.) Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1928)
18.
Johnson-BaileyJ.CerveroR. (2008). Different worlds and divergent paths: Academic careers defined by race and gender. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.nl53n670443651l7
19.
MacfarlaneB.BurgD. (2019). Women professors and the academic housework trap. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1589682
20.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616671930
21.
MisraJ.LundquistJ. H.HolmesE.AgiomavritisS. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 97(1), 22–26.
22.
MorseJ. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook for qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Sage. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.020213
PattonT. O. (2004). Reflections of a Black woman professor: Racism and sexism in academia. Howard Journal of Communications, 15(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170490483629
27.
RobnettR. D.VierraK. D. (2023). Gender development within patriarchal social systems. In ZurbriggenE. L.CapdevilaR. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of power, gender, and psychology (pp. 319–339). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41531-9_18
28.
RoosP. A. (2008). Together but unequal: Combating gender inequity in the academy. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.13.2.f
29.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
30.
SaldañaJ.OmastaM. (2022). Qualitative research: Analyzing life (2nd ed.). Sage.
31.
SchramT. H. (2003). Conceptualizing qualitative inquiry: Mindwork for fieldwork in education and the social sciences. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
32.
ShouldiceH. N. (2023). Gender microaggressions: An examination of existing research on the experiences of female band directors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 41(3), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221094835
33.
ShouldiceH. N.EastridgeJ. (2020). A comparison of Virginia band performance assessments in relation to director gender. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10/1177/0022429420922137
34.
SmithT. D.DansereauD. R.BylicaK.DubrotR.HendricksK. S. (2024). Interrogating the myth that sexism no longer exists in the music education academy. In ScheiT. B.HoldhusK.EhrlichA. (Eds.), Methodological musings: Thinking with narrative in music education research (pp. 103–117). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67965-0_8
