BradyA. C.GriffinM. M.LewisA. R.FongC. J.RobinsonD. H. (2023). How scientific is educational psychology research? The increasing trend of squeezing causality and recommendations from non-intervention studies. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09759-9
2.
DumasD.EdelsbrunnerP. (2023). How to make recommendations for educational practice from correlational data using structural equation models. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09770-0
3.
GroszM. P. (2023). Should researchers make causal inferences and recommendations for practice on the basis of nonexperimental studies?Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09777-7
4.
HsiehP. (P.-H.)AceeT.ChungW.-H.HsiehY.-P.KimH.ThomasG. D.YouJ.-I.LevinJ. R.RobinsonD. H. (2005). Is educational intervention research on the decline?Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.523
5.
MayerR. E. (2023). How to assess whether an instructional intervention has an effect on learning. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09783-9
6.
ZitzmannS.MachtsN.HübnerN.SchauberS. K.MöllerJ.LindnerC. (2023). The yet underestimated importance of communicating findings from educational trials to teachers, schools, school authorities, or policy makers (Comment on Brady et al. (2023)). Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09776-8