The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of model recordings on undergraduate conductors’ tempo decisions for selected wind band excerpts. Participants (N = 42) studied three music score excerpts for 5 minutes each either (a) with an increased-tempo recording, (b) with a decreased-tempo recording, or (c) with a metronome set to the faster, printed tempo in the score, followed by a tapping task to demonstrate their preferred tempo. Participants returned 48 hours after their score study session for retention testing in the form of a second tapping task. Results indicated that for two of the three pieces, participants tapped faster in response to the metronome compared to both the decreased- and increased-tempo model recordings. Participants’ tempo choices at the first testing session were most often not significantly different than the tempos they heard during study. However, we found that participants’ preferred tempos did not vary as a function of study conditions during the retention testing session that occurred 48 hours later, where tempos trended toward moderation across all three musical selections. We speculate that pedagogical recommendations to avoid using model recordings may have limited empirical support, at least among novice conductors and at least in terms of possible long-term effects from short-term use.
AndersonJ. N. (1981). Effects of tape-recorded aural models on sight-reading and performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344676
2.
ArmstrongR. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131
3.
BattistiF.GarofaloR. (1990). Guide to score study for the wind band conductor. Meredith Music.
4.
BlancaM. J.AlarcónR.ArnauJ.BonoR.BendayanR. (2018). Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit?Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 937–962. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2
5.
BonusA. E. (2022). Maelzel, the metronome, and the modern mechanics of musical time. In DoffmanM.PayneE.YoungT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of time in music (pp. 303–340). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190947279.013.16
6.
BoswellM. A. (2022). Relationships between music experience and steady beat performance in wind instrumentalists (Publication No. 29161607) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
7.
BrittinR. V. (1992). Perceptions in conducting: Accuracy in detecting modulated beat. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 1–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318507
8.
CashC. D.AllenS. E.SimmonsA. L.DukeR. A. (2014). Effects of model performances on skill acquisition and overnight memory consolidation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413520409
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CollyerC. E.BroadbentH. A.ChurchR. M. (1994). Preferred rates of repetitive tapping and categorical time production. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205301
11.
ColwellR. J.HewittM. P. (2011). The teaching of instrumental music (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
12.
ConfredoD. A.GeringerJ. M.ParisiJ. (2021). Effects of experience on tempo preference for selected wind band masterworks. Journal of Research in Music Education, 69(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420977204
13.
CroweD. R. (1996). Effects of score study style on beginning conductors’ error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345668
14.
DrakeC.BotteM. C. (1993). Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple-look model. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205262
15.
EllisB. L. (1994). Selected band conductors’ preparation to conduct selected band compositions (Publication No. 9503182) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
EpsteinD. (1995). Shaping time: Music, the brain, and performance. Schirmer.
18.
FribergA.SundbergJ. (1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronous sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 2524–2531. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413218
19.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
20.
GeringerJ. M. (2010). Musicians’ preferences for tempo and pitch levels in recorded orchestral music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410380464
21.
GeringerJ. M.BrittinR. V.ConfredoD. A. (2016). Tempo preferences for fast and slow music excerpts of jazz, Western classical, pop/rock, and Brazilian pop. In Boal-PalheirosG. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th international seminar of the ISME commission on research (pp. 118–127). International Society for Music Education.
22.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344838
23.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1987). Pitch and tempo preferences in recorded popular music. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 204–212). University of Alabama Press.
24.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K.MacLeodR. B.DroeK. (2006). The effect of articulation style on perception of modulated tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940605400405
HessW. (1988). The right tempo: Beethoven and the metronome. The Beethoven Newsletter, 3(1), 16–17.
28.
KuhnT. L. (1974). Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344764
29.
LabutaJ. A.MatthewsW. K. (2018). Basic conducting techniques (7th ed.). Routledge.
30.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
31.
LevitinD. J.CookP. R. (1996). Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(6), 927–935. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205494
LiuY.LiuG.WeiD.LiQ.YuanG.WuS.WangGZhaoX. (2018). Effects of musical tempo on musicians’ and non-musicians’ emotional experience when listening to music. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02118
34.
LondonJ. (2011). Tactus ≠ tempo: Some dissociations between attentional focus, motor behavior, and tempo judgment. Empirical Musicology Review, 6(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/49761
35.
MadsenC. K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344892
36.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A.GeringerJ. M. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded band music among wind and percussion musicians. Journal of Band Research, 20(1), 20–29.
37.
MontemayorM.MossE. A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409343183
38.
MontemayorM.NápolesJ.SilveyB. A.WieseL. (2023). Effects of score study and conducting gesture on collegiate musicians’ ability to detect errors in a choral score. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221090432
39.
MontemayorM.SilveyB. A.AdamsA. L.WittK. L. (2016). Effects of internal and external focus of attention during novices’ instructional preparation on subsequent rehearsal behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415612201
40.
MorganJ. F. (2007). p value fetishism and use of the Bonferroni adjustment. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 10(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.10.2.34
41.
MorrisonS. J. (2002). The use of recorded models in the instrumental rehearsal: Effects on ensemble achievement. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512330202000206
42.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345434
43.
PovelD.-J. (1981). Internal representation of simple temporal patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.3
RadocyR. E.BoyleJ. D. (2012). Psychological foundations of musical behavior (5th ed.). Charles C. Thomas.
46.
ReppB. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206433
47.
ReppB. H.SuY.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2
48.
SheldonD. A. (1994). Effects of tempo, musical experience, and listening modes on tempo modulation perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(3), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345699
49.
SilveyB. A.MontemayorM. (2014). Effects of internal and external focus of attention on novices’ rehearsal evaluations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414530434
50.
SilveyB. A.MontemayorM.BaumgartnerC. M. (2017). An observational study of score study practices among undergraduate instrumental music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416688700
51.
SilveyB. A.SpringerD. G.EubanksS. C. (2016). An examination of university conducting faculty members’ score study attitudes and practices. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715616442
ToneyH. (2000). Expressive ensemble conducting and performing: A qualitative case study of one conductor’s practice (Publication No. 9990167) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
54.
TreviñoA. R. (2008). The effect of the use of an aural model during score study on undergraduate music majors’ conducting gesture (Publication No. 3318463) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
55.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2017). Recordings as learning and practising resources for performance: Exploring attitudes and behaviours of music students and professionals. Musicae Scientiae, 21(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916674048
56.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2021). Performers’ discourses on listening to recordings. Research Studies in Music Education, 43(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19899168
57.
WaggonerD. T. (2011). Effects of listening conditions, error types, and ensemble textures on error detection skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410396094
58.
WangC. C. (1984). Effects of some aspects of rhythm on tempo perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344836
59.
WangC. C.SalzbergR. S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344979
60.
WapnickJ. (1980). The perception of music and metronomic tempo change in musicians. Psychology of Music, 8(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/030573568081001
61.
YarbroughC. (1987). The effect of music excerpts on tempo discriminations and preferences of musicians and non-musicians. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 175–189). University of Alabama Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
