The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of transitional elements on listeners’ aesthetic responses. Participants (N = 81) viewed an excerpt of a choral performance while manipulating a Continuous Response Digital Interface to record their aesthetic responses. Participants in one group viewed the original choral performance, which included two purposeful transitions and no applause between pieces. In the other group, participants viewed the same choral performance but with applause over a black screen added between pieces. Participants then answered two open-ended questions to indicate the features of the performance most salient to their aesthetic responses. Mean aesthetic responses during each transition were higher for the continuous transition group compared to the applause group; however, differences between groups were statistically significant only during the attacca transition between the second and third piece. In response to “What factors contributed the most to your aesthetic response?” participants most commonly cited ensemble musicianship, followed by compositional elements such as harmonic, melodic, or rhythmic material; performer engagement; and song choices. When describing what kept them most engaged, participants mentioned programming most frequently, with the majority of comments referencing variety. We discuss implications for music teaching and learning.
BarradasG. T.JuslinP. N.i BadiaS. B. (2021). Emotional reactions to music in dementia patients and healthy controls: Differential responding depends on the mechanism. Music & Science, 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043211010152
2.
BjellaR. (2017). The art of successful programming. In AbrahamsF.HeadP. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of choral pedagogy (pp. 281–301). Oxford.
3.
ClynesM. (1977). Sentics: The touch of emotions. Doubleday/Anchor.
4.
CoggiolaJ. (1996). The effect of physically manipulating a CRDI dial on the focus of attention of nonmusicians/musicians and perceived aesthetic response [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Florida State University.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
CruseC. (2018, September14-15). Choral singers’ perceptions of rehearsing and performing in the Choregie genre [Conference presentation]. Symposium on Research in Choral Singing, Evanston, IL, United States.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
8.
DavisA. P. (1998). Performance achievement and analysis of teaching during choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345346
9.
DiazF. M. (2011). Mindfulness, attention, and flow during music listening: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611415144
10.
DiazF. M.SilveiraJ. M. (2014). Music and affective phenomena: A 20-year content and bibliometric analysis of research in three eminent journals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413519269
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
12.
FraenkelJ. R.WallenN. E.HyunH. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
13.
FredricksonW. E. (1995). A comparison of perceived musical tension and aesthetic response. Psychology of Music, 23(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735695231006
14.
FregaA. L. (2000/2001). Aesthetic response to music as measured by the CRDI: A cross-cultural replication. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147, 61–65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319388
15.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1995/1996). Focus of attention to elements: Listening patterns of musicians and nonmusicians. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 80–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318770
16.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (2003). Gradual tempo change and aesthetic responses of music majors. International Journal of Music Education, 40(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576140304000102
17.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K.GregoryD. (2004). A fifteen-year history of the Continuous Response Digital Interface: Issues relating to validity and reliability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319214
18.
GoldsteinA. (1980). Thrills in response to music and other stimuli. Physiological Psychology, 8(1), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326460
19.
GregoryD. (1989). Using computers to measure continuous music responses. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 8(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094244
20.
HatohT.KatoM.KuwanoS.NambaS. (1989, October). Assessment of musical performance using the method of continuous judgment of selected description. In OhgushiK. (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 33–36). City University of Arts.
21.
HuronD. (2019). Musical aesthetics: Uncertainty and surprise enhance our enjoyment of music. Current Biology, 29, R1238–R1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.021
22.
HuronD.VuoskoskiJ. K. (2020). On the enjoyment of sad music: Pleasurable compassion theory and the role of trait empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01060
23.
JuslinP. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
24.
JuslinP. N. (2016). Emotional reactions to music. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed., pp. 197–213). Oxford University Press.
25.
JuslinP. N.SakkaL. S.BarradasG. T.LiljeströmS. (2016). No accounting for taste? Idiographic models of aesthetic judgment in music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000034
26.
MacMullenK. (2021). Intentional in-between: The art of seamless performance transitions [Conference presentation]. ACDA National Convention, Dallas, TX, United States.
27.
MadsenC. K. (1987). Background music: Competition for focus of attention. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 315–325). University of Alabama Press.
28.
MadsenC. K. (1997). Focus of attention and aesthetic response. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345467
29.
MadsenC. K.BrittinR. V.Capperella-SheldonD. A. (1993). An empirical method for measuring the aesthetic experience to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345480
30.
MadsenC. K.ByrnesS. R.Capperella-SheldonD. A.BrittinR. V. (1993). Aesthetic response to music: Musicians versus nonmusicians. Journal of Music Therapy, 30(3), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/30.3.174
31.
MadsenC. K.CoggiolaJ. C. (2001). The effect of manipulating a CRDI dial on the focus of attention of musicians/nonmusicians and perceived aesthetic response. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 105, 13–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319085
32.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1990). Differential patterns of music listening. Focus of attention of musicians versus nonmusicians. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 105, 45–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318390
33.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1999). Comparisons of good versus bad tone quality/intonation of vocal and string performances: Issues concerning measurement and reliability of the Continuous Response Digital Interface. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 86–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318990
34.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2000/2001). A focus of attention model for meaningful listening. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147, 103–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319396
35.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2004). Gradual pitch change and aesthetic responses of music majors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 161/162, 135–143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319247
36.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2008). Reflections on Puccini’s La Boheme: Investigating a model for listening. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323072
37.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M.FredricksonW. E. (1997). Focus of attention to musical elements in Haydn’s Symphony #104. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 57–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318840
38.
MeyerL. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. University of Chicago Press.
39.
NápolesJ.MadsenC. K. (2008). Measuring emotional responses to music within a classroom setting. International Journal of Music Education, 26(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761407085650
40.
NápolesJ.SilveiraJ. M. (2020). Preservice and inservice teachers’ perceptions of pacing. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(2), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719882702
41.
NielsenF. V. (1983). Oplevelse af musikalsk spaending [The experience of musical tension]. Akademisk Forlag.
42.
RadocyR. E.BoyleJ. D. (2012). Psychological foundations of musical behavior (5th ed.). Charles C. Thomas.
RyanC.WapnickJ.LacailleN.DarrowA.-A. (2006). The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators’ performance ratings. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606068106
45.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
SilveiraJ. M. (2014). The perception of pacing in a music appreciation class and its relationship to teacher effectiveness and teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414542978
48.
SilveiraJ. M.DiazF. M. (2014). The effect of subtitles on listeners’ perceptions of expressivity. Psychology of Music, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612463951
49.
SilveiraJ. M.SilveyB. A. (2020). Effects of ensemble size and repertoire difficulty on ratings of concert band performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420908280
50.
SouthallJ. (2003). The effect of purposeful distractors places in an excerpt of Puccini’s La Boheme to ascertain their influence on the listening experience (Publication No. 3109311) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
51.
SpringerD. G.SchlegelA. L. (2016). Effects of applause magnitude and musical style on listeners’ evaluations of wind band performances. Psychology of Music, 44(4), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615591307
52.
SpringerD. G.SchlegelA. L.NápolesJ. (2018). Effects of applause magnitude and musical style on listeners’ evaluations of choral performances. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418771985
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
