Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this instrumental case study was to investigate band teacher agency in a high-stakes performance environment. Research questions were: (1) What experiences and professional relationships were most salient in the past (iterative), present (practical-evaluative), and future (projective) dimensions of band teacher agency in a high-stakes performance environment? and (2) How did high-stakes performance practices, mediated by teacher agency, shape music teaching and learning in school bands? I used Emirbayer and Mische’s chordal triad of agency and Priestley et al.’s ecological framework of teacher agency as theoretical frameworks, and I collected data in the forms of interviews, observations, and document review in 2019. Participants’ agency emerged from their interactions with music education organizations that perpetuated a high-stakes performance environment. Powerful structures (state associations) and individual agents (band teachers) sustained each other through norms and values derived from their contextual discourse. Findings indicated that visions for holistic music-making and greater diversity and inclusion in school music must include structural changes in professional organizations. For example, state associations could enact policies that incentivize teachers to exert agency to engage students in other forms of music learning in addition to performance preparation.

Keywords

teacher agency band teacher evaluation high-stakes performance curricular reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramo

M. N.

(2008). Music educator as change agent: A personal narrative. In Thompson

L. K.

Campbell

M. R.

(Eds.),Diverse methodologies in the study of music teaching and learning(pp. 91–109). Information Age.

Agency. (2009). In Scott

Marshall

(Eds.), A dictionary of sociology (3rd Rev. ed.). https://www.oxfordreference.com

Allsup

R. E.

(2012). The moral ends of band. Theory Into Practice, 51(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.690288

Allsup

R. E.

(2015). Music teacher quality and the problem of routine expertise. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 23(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.23.1.5

ASBOA. (n.d.). [Home page]. https://www.asboa.org/

Austin

J. R.

(1990). Competition: Is music education the loser? Music Educators Journal, 76(6), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3400964

Barrett

J. R.

(2020). Policy at the intersection of curriculum and music teacher agency. Music Educators Journal, 107(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120939646

Bates

V. C.

Gossett

J. B.

Stimeling

(2020). Country music education for diverse and inclusive music classrooms. Music Educators Journal, 107(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120956386

Burnsed

Sochinski

(1983). Research on competitions: Surveys reveal how students, parents, directors, and administrators feel about competitions. Music Educators Journal, 70(2), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3401207

10.

Byo

J. L.

(2018). “Modern Band” as school music: A case study. International Journal of Music Education, 36(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761417729546

11.

Byron Nelson High School Band. (n.d.) A parent’s guide to competition. http://northwestbyron.ss10.sharpschool.com/our_school/extra__co-_curricular/band/a_parents_guide_to_competition

12.

Clem

(1978). Is winning that important? The Instrumentalist, 144.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

14.

Dewey

Bentley

A. F.

(1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon.

15.

Dolloff

L. A.

(1999). Imagining ourselves as teachers: The development of teacher identity in music teacher education. Music Education Research, 1(2), 191–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/1461380990010206

16.

Dykema

P. W.

(1923). The contest idea in music. Music Supervisors Journal, 10(2), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3383104

17.

Elpus

(2015). Music teacher licensure candidates in the United States: A demographic profile and analysis of licensure examination scores. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415602470

18.

Elpus

Abril

C. R.

(2019). Who enrolls in high school music? A national profile of U.S. students, 2009–2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419862837

19.

Emirbayer

(1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209

20.

Emirbayer

Mische

(1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

21.

Fitzpatrick

K. R.

Henninger

J. C.

Taylor

D. M.

(2014). Access and retention of marginalized populations within undergraduate music education degree programs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414530760

22.

Floyd

(1986). Music contests: A means or an end? The Instrumentalist, 41(5), 70–71.

23.

Forbes

G. W.

(1994). Evaluative music festivals and contests—Are they fair? Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 12(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512339401200203

24.

Gerrard

C. L.

(2021). “It’s more than playing music”: Exploring band in a predominately Latinx community. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 227, 66–85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.227.0066

25.

GRAMMY in the Schools. (2021). GRAMMY Music Educator Award. http://www.grammyintheschools.com/programs/grammy-music-educator-award

26.

Green

(2002). How popular musicians learn. Ashgate.

27.

Guest

MacQueen

Namey

E. E.

(2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.

28.

Hash

P. M.

(2013). Large-Group contest ratings and music teacher evaluation: Issues and recommendations. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.826035

29.

Humphreys

J. T.

(1992). Instrumental music in American education: In service of many masters. In Fonder

(Ed.), Ithaca Conference on American Music Education (pp. 25–51). Ithaca College Press.

30.

Idaho Music Educators Association. (n.d.). IHSAA music regulations. https://www.idahomusiced.org/rules/ihsaarules.php

31.

Koza

J. E.

(2008). Listening for Whiteness: Hearing racial politics in undergraduate school music. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.2979/PME.2008.16.2.145

32.

Kratus

(2007). Music education at the tipping point. Music Educators Journal, 94(2), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002743210709400209

33.

Lincoln

Guba

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

34.

Lorway

V. H.

(2019). A toe-tapping good time: Informal musicking through critical pedagogy in inclusive settings. Journal of Popular Music Education, 3(3), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1386/jpme_00009_1

35.

McGahey

Heath

Chapple

Bloss

(2015). Keller high school band handbook. https://4b0f70af-0bbb-4f9d-968b-5541e7781774.filesusr.com/ugd/2ec621_d51c22d754404d6fb20fe6037cda1204.pdf

36.

Mead

G. H.

(1932). The philosophy of the present. University of Chicago Press.

37.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

38.

Midwest Clinic. (2021). Meet the performers. https://www.midwestclinic.org/performers/midwest-clinic-performing-organizations

39.

Natale-Abramo

(2014). The construction of instrumental music teacher identity. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 202, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.202.0051

40.

O’Leary

E. J.

(2019). A phenomenological study of competition in high school bands. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 220, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.220.0043

41.

Parker

E. C.

(2016). The experience of creating community: An intrinsic case study of four Midwestern public school choral teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416648292

42.

Payne

(1997). A review of research on band competition. Journal of Band Research, 33(1), 1–19.

43.

Powell

Dépelteau

(2013). Introduction. In Powell

Dépelteau

(Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 1–12). Palgrave MacMillan.

44.

Powell

S. R.

(2017). The self-authoring of a music educator: A journey through figured worlds. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 210–211, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.210-211.0025

45.

Powell

S. R.

(2019). Structure and agency in novice music teaching. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18794514

46.

Powell

S. R.

Parker

E. C.

(2017). Preservice music teachers’ descriptions of successful and unsuccessful teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(3), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083716662689

47.

Priestley

Biesta

Robinson

(2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.

48.

Richerme

L. K.

(2016). Measuring music education: A philosophical investigation of the Model Cornerstone Assessments. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416659250

49.

Robinson

(2015). The inchworm and the nightingale: On the (mis)use of data in music teacher evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 116, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.944966

50.

Robinson

(2019). Music teachers' perceptions of high stakes teacher evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 120, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1373380

51.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

52.

Seidman

(2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

53.

Shaw

R. D.

(2014). The work-life balance of competitive marching band teachers: A multiple case study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 200, 63–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.200.0063

54.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

55.

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.). https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/19_04_76-1001.pdf

56.

Texas Music Educators Association. (n.d.). Convention attendance. https://www.tmea.org/convention/attendance-history/

57.

Texas Music Forms. (n.d.). State music contest results reports. https://www.texasmusicforms.com/results.asp

58.

Thibeault

M. D.

(2010). General music as a cure for the high-stakes concert. General Music Today, 23(3), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371309359614

59.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

60.

Turino

(2008). Music as social life: The politics of participation. The University of Chicago Press.

61.

University Interscholastic League. (2021). About the UIL. https://www.uiltexas.org/about

62.

Williams

D. A.

(2011). The elephant in the room. Music Educators Journal, 98(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432111415538

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Band Teacher Agency in a High-Stakes Performance Environment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material