Access to music education in American schools is not guaranteed. Although national studies have demonstrated disparities based on poverty, race, and other markers, these studies miss a necessary level of local detail in describing access. Additionally, studies that exist are based on self-report surveys and prone to nonresponse bias. The purpose of this study was to describe access to music education at the state level. Using Michigan administrative data provided by the state department of education, we describe the state’s population of music educators and examine student access to music education. We found that music teachers differed from nonmusic teachers in a number of ways. We also identified substantial and persistent disparities in access to music education across the state. These findings have important implications for school arts education policy.
AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (2006). The state of music in the elementary school: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940605400102
2.
AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (2008). The state of music in secondary schools: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408317516
3.
AustinJ. R.RussellJ. A. (2008). Charter schools: Embracing or excluding the arts? In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Diverse methodologies in the study of music teaching and learning (pp. 163–182). Information Age.
4.
BartikT. J.LachowskaM. (2014, March14). The effects of doubling instruction efforts on middle school students’ achievement: Evidence from a multiyear regression-discontinuity design [Conference presentation]. Association for Education and Finance Policy Conference, San Antonio, TX, United States.
5.
BroudyH. S. (1979). Arts education: Necessary or just nice?Phi Delta Kappan, 60(5), 347–350.
6.
BurrackF. W.PayneP.BazanD. E.HellmanD. S. (2014). The impact of budget cutbacks on music teaching positions and district funding in three Midwestern states. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314521039
7.
Center on Education Policy. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects.
ElpusK. (2013). Music in U.S. federal education policy: Estimating the effect of “core status” for music. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2013.744242
10.
ElpusK. (2014). Evaluating the effect of No Child Left Behind on U.S. music course enrollments. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(3), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414530759
11.
ElpusK. (2015). Music teacher licensure candidates in the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 314-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415602470
12.
ElpusK. (2016). Understanding America’s human capital investment in arts education: Arts educators in the nation’s public schools [Research: Art Works working paper]. National Endowment for the Arts.
13.
ElpusK. E. (2017). Understanding the availability of arts education in U.S. high schools [Research: Art Works working paper]. National Endowment for the Arts.
14.
ElpusK. (2020). Access to arts education in America: The availability of visual art, music, dance, and theater courses in U.S. high schools. Arts Education Policy Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1773365
15.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 128–145. http://doi.org/10.1177/002242941140520
16.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2019). Who enrolls in high school music? A national profile of U.S. students, 2009-2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419862837
17.
GardnerR. D. (2010). Should I stay or should i go? Factors that influence the retention, turnover, and attrition of k-12 music teachers in the united states. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(3), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910903458896
18.
Government Accountability Office. (2009). Access to arts education: Inclusion of additional questions in education’s planned research would help explain why instruction time has decreased for some students.
19.
KelleyJ.DemorestS. M. (2016). Music programs in charter and traditional schools: A comparative study of Chicago elementary schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416630282
LorahJ. A.SandersE. A.MorrisonS. J. (2014). The relationship between English language learner status and music ensemble participation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414542301
22.
MajorM. L. (2013). How they decide: A case study examining the decision-making process for keeping or cutting music in a K–12 public school district. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412474313
23.
MarkM. L.GaryC. L. (2007). A history of American music education (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield/National Association for Music Education.
24.
McKoyC. L. (2012). Effects of selected demographic variables on music student teachers’ self-reported cross-cultural competence. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(4), 375–394. doi:10.1177/0022429412463398
MorrisonR. B. (2019). Arts ed now: The 2019 New Jersey arts education annual report. Arts Ed NJ.
27.
ParsadB.SpiegelmanM. (2012). Arts education in public elementary and secondary schools: 1999–2000 and 2009–10 (NCES 2012–014). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
28.
PembrookR.CraigC. (2002). Teaching as a profession: Two variations on a theme. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 786–817). Oxford University Press.
29.
PrendergastJ. S. (2020). Music education and music educators in Missouri, Iowa, and Illinois. Journal of Research in Music Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420961501
RutledgeS. A.NealB. G. (2013). “The numbers speak for themselves”: Data use and the organization of schooling in two Florida elementary schools. In AnagnostopoulosD.RutledgeS. A.JacobsenR. (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 113–128). Harvard Education Press.
32.
SalvadorK.AllegoodK. (2014). Access to music education with regard to race in two urban areas. Arts Education Policy Review, 115(3), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.914389
33.
ShawR. D. (2018). The vulnerability of urban elementary school arts programs: A case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417739855
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
