Addressing the disparate levels of aural skills that students may have acquired through their daily musical experiences prior to formal schooling can be difficult. Placement tests within the Western classical musical tradition typically involve structural decoding and formal concepts of elementary music theory. In this manuscript, we discuss the development of a music placement evaluation for beginner students (N = 539) involved in the ear training and music theory classes of a university outreach program. The measure consisted of 12 aural skills tasks inspired by the principles of Serafine’s music development model that assessed knowledge acquired from daily music experiences without stressing the formal nomenclature of music theory. Stimuli were comprised of temporal (idiomatic construction and textural abstraction) and nontemporal processes (melodic closure, harmonic closure, transformation, and hierarchical levels) according to Serafine’s model. The comprehension of tempo, register, and melodic contours also was evaluated. The use of real music excerpts, some of which likely belonged to students’ own repertoires, may have helped the students to concentrate on the cognitive/aural tasks. The implications of this evaluation for music education are discussed.
AtarH. Y.SayinA.AtarB. (2013). Examination of the classification of accuracy of music education special aptitude exams. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1573–1577. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1473
3.
BigandE. (2003). More about the musical expertise of musically untrained listeners. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1284.041
BigandE.VieillardS.MadurellF.McAdamsS.PoulinB. (2002). Effects of instrumentation on the memorization of musical materials. In StevensC.BurnhamD.McPhersonG.SchubertE.RenwickJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Causal Productions.
6.
BrownA. V.ThompsonG. L. (2016). The evolution of foreign language AP Exam candidates: A 36-year descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12197.
7.
CastroM. G.De AlvesD. A. (2017). Teaching, research and outreach program at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa: Origin and institutional trajectory (1926–1988). Revista Brasileira de Educação, 22(70), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782017227038
DemorestS. M.MorrisonS. J.Vu NguyenV. Q.BodnarE. N. (2016). The influence of contextual cues on cultural bias in music memory. Music Perception: An interdisciplinary Journal, 33(5), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2016.33.5.590
10.
DeutschD. (2013). Grouping mechanisms in music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd. ed., pp. 183–325). Academic Press.
11.
DowlingW. J.HarwoodD. L. (1986). Music cognition. Academic Press.
12.
DysonM. C.WatkinsA. J. (1984). A figural approach to the role of melodic contour in melody recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 477–488.
13.
EckesT. (2017). Setting cut scores on an EFL placement test using the prototype group method: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Language Testing, 34(3), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216672703
14.
FujiokaT.TrainerL. J.RossB.KakigiR.PantevC. (2005). Automatic encoding to polyphonic melodies in musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1578–1592. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892905774597263
15.
GomesV. E.VargasA. M. D.FerreiraE. F. (2013). The academic dimension of university extension programs. Brazilian Oral Research, 27(5), 387–388. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000500001
16.
Grannan-RubensteinG.Grannan-RubensteinW.ThibodeauP. (2014). Enculturation effects of musical training on pitch discrimination. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36, 2985–2989.
17.
HallamS.ShawJ. (2002). Constructions of musical ability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153(4), 102–108.
18.
HargreavesD.LamontA. (2017). The psychology of musical development. Cambridge University Press.
19.
HeffnerC. C.SlevcL. R. (2015). Prosodic structure as a parallel to musical structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01962
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. A. (1983). Generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
LessaB. S.De SouzaA. C. A. A.Silva-FilhoJ. C. L. (2016). From the Brazilian semiarid to university: The incorporation of a Cooperative Learning Project as academic extension. Brazilian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40552-016-0015-6.
26.
LimA.DoumasA. A.SinnettS. (2014). Supramodal representations in melodic perception. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixty Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2573–2578). Cognitive Science Society.
27.
MadausG. F.AirasianP. W. (1970). Placement, formative, diagnostic, and summative evaluation of classroom learning. In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–24). AERA.
McAdamsS.MatzkinD. (2003). The roots of musical variation in perceptual similarity and invariance. In PeretzIZatorreR. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of music (pp. 79–94). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525202.003.0006
NeuhausCKnöscheT. R.FriedericiA. D. (2009). Similarity and Repetition. An ERP study on musical form perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04791.x
32.
NorthA.HargreavesD. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford University Press.
33.
PrinceJ. B.SchmucklerM. A.ThompsonW. F. (2009). Cross-modal melodic contours similarity. Canadian Acoustics, 37(1), 37–49.
34.
RobinsonK.PattersonR. D. (1995). The duration required to identify an instrument, the octave, or the pitch chroma of a musical note. Music Perception, 13(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285682
RunfolaM.SwanwickK. (2002). Developmental characteristics of music learners (2002). In CowellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 373–397). Oxford University Press.
37.
SaffranJ. R.JohnsonE. K.AslinR. N.NewportE. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequence by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), p. 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00075-4
38.
SchwarzerG. (1987). Analytic and holistic modes in the development of melody perception. Psychology of Music, 25(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735697251004
39.
SerafineM. L. (1988). Music as cognition. The development of though in sound. Columbia University Press.
ThautM. H.TrimarchiP. D.ParsonsL. M. (2014). Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: Common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern. Brain Science, 4(2), 428–452. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci4020428
43.
ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G. (2006). Listening to music. In ColwellR. (Ed.), MENC handbook of music cognition and development (pp. 72–123). Oxford University Press.
44.
Timpe-LaughlinV.ChoiI. (2017). Exploring the validity of a second language intercultural pragmatics assessment tool. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1256406
45.
TorffB. (2002). A comparative review of human ability theory: Context, structure and development. In CowellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 509–521). Oxford University Press.
46.
Van der WeijB.PearceM. T.HoningH. (2017). A probabilistic model of meter perception: Simulating enculturation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00824
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
