The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of timbral instructions on pitch and timbre production. High school (n = 28) and collegiate (n = 28) trumpeters played sustained tones at two octave levels (written C4 and C5) following three types of timbral instructions (dark-timbre, bright-timbre, or neutral instructions). Presentation orders were randomly assigned. Dependent variables included one acoustical measure of pitch (absolute cent deviation) and one acoustical measure of timbre (spectral centroid). Participants also reported which type of instruction they perceived to result in their “best sound” and their “most in-tune performance.” Results indicated a significant interaction between timbral instruction condition and octave. Post hoc testing revealed that timbral instructions affected participants’ absolute cent deviation, but different effects were observed in each octave. The effect of timbral instructions on participants’ spectral centroid was nonsignificant. Participants demonstrated a preference for the neutral instruction over the dark- and bright-timbre instructions, and their tuning accuracy varied by octave and instruction condition. These data suggest that music educators may need to use timbral instructions judiciously so that the instruction to play with a different timbre does not result in unintentional changes in pitch.
AtkinsR. L. (2018). Focus of attention in singing: Expert listeners’ descriptions of change in trained singers’ tone quality. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 6(1), 3–24. https://acda.org/ACDA/Publications-Root/IJRCS/Volume_6.aspx
BorchertE. M. O.MicheylC.OxenhamA. J. (2011). Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 257–269. https://doi.org/0.1037/a0020670
5.
BregmanA. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
6.
ByoJ. L.SchlegelA. L. (2016). Effects of stimulus octave and timbre on the tuning accuracy of advanced college instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(3), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416662451
7.
ByoJ. L.SchlegelA. L.ClarkN. A. (2011). Effects of stimulus octave and timbre on the tuning accuracy of secondary school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(4), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410386230
8.
CassidyJ. W.SchlegelA. L. (2016). The role of initial attack and performer expertise on instrument identification. International Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761415614797
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
ComptonG. (2006). The influence of performance background on instrumentalists’ ability to discriminate and label cornet and trumpet timbre (Publication No. 3230369) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
12.
ElliottC. A. (1975). Attacks and releases as factors in instrument identification. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345201
13.
ElyM. C. (1992). Effects of timbre on college woodwind players’ intonational performance and perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345565
14.
FabrizioA. (1994). A guide to the understanding and correction of intonation problems. Meredith Music.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
16.
FeldmanE.ContziusA.LutchM. (2016). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony (2nd ed.). Routledge.
17.
FonderM. (1998). Defining and realizing your band’s ideal tone. Music Educators Journal, 85(3), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399141
18.
GarofaloR. J. (1996). Improving intonation in band and orchestra performance. Meredith Music.
19.
GatesS.McAdamsS.SmithB. K. (2016). The effect of timbre differences on pitch interval identification in musically trained listeners [abstract]. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (p. 695). http://icmpc.org/icmpc14/proceedings.html
20.
GeringerJ. M.FlowersP. J. (2017, March22–25). Can musicians tell bright from dark? The role of spectral distributions [Paper presentation]. Clifford K. Madsen International Symposium on Research in Music Behavior, Austin, TX, United States.
21.
GeringerJ. M.MacLeodR. B.EllisJ. C. (2014). Two studies of pitch in string instrument vibrato: Perception and pitch matching responses of university and high school string players. International Journal of Music Education, 32(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411433728
22.
GeringerJ. M.MacLeodR. B.MadsenC. K.NápolesJ. (2015). Perception of melodic intonation in performances with and without rubato. Psychology of Music, 43(5), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614534004
23.
GeringerJ. M.MacLeodR. B.SasanfarJ. K. (2015). In tune or out of tune: Are different instruments and voice heard differently?Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415572025
24.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345348
25.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (2005). Music majors’ perception of flugelhorn and Bb, C, Eb, and piccolo trumpets. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 166, 7–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319276
26.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K.DunniganP. (2001). Trumpet tone quality versus intonation revisited: Two extensions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 148, 65–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319079
27.
GeringerJ. M.WorthyM. D. (1999). Effects of tone-quality changes on intonation and tone-quality ratings of high school and college instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345719
28.
HajdaJ. M. (2007). The effect of dynamic acoustical features on musical timbre. In BeauchampJ. W. (Ed.), Analysis, synthesis, and perception of musical sounds: The sound of music (pp. 250–271). Springer.
29.
HandelS.EricksonM. L. (2001). A rule of thumb: The bandwidth for timbre invariance is one octave. Music Perception, 19(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.121
30.
HayslettD. J. (1990). The effect of selected tuning pitch sources on the tuning accuracy of band members. Contributions to Music Education, 17, 44–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127471
31.
HubertyC. J.MorrisJ. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.302
32.
JohnsonC. M.GeringerJ. M. (2007). Predicting music majors’ overall ratings of wind band performances: Elements of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 35–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319468
33.
KrumhanslC. LIversonP. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.739
34.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1976). Preferences for trumpet tone quality versus intonation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 46, 13–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40317397
35.
MarozeauJ.de CheveignéA. (2007). The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2384910
36.
McAdamsS. (2013). Musical timbre perception. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 35–67). Academic Press.
37.
MelaraR. D.MarksL. E. (1990). Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 48(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207084
38.
MorrisonS. J. (2000). Effect of melodic context, tuning behaviors, and experience on the intonation accuracy of wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345455
39.
OxenhamA. J. (2013). The perception of musical tones. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 1–33). Academic Press.
40.
PistonW. (1955). Orchestration. W. W. Norton.
41.
SchlegelA. L.LaneJ. S. (2013). An exploratory study of adult amateur musicians’ identification of instrumental timbre. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 196, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.196.0065
42.
SchlegelA. L.SpringerD. G. (2018). Effects of accurate and inaccurate visual feedback on the tuning accuracy of high school and college trombonists. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418763914
SilveyB. A.NápolesJ.SpringerD. G. (2019). Effects of pre-tuning vocalization behaviors on the tuning accuracy of college instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418806304
45.
SpradlingR. L. (1985). Perception and preference of tone quality/intonation variables in flute/oboe duets by woodwind/brass performers. Journal of Band Research, 20(2), 27–39.
46.
SpringerD. G. (2016). Effects of conductor score type and ensemble performance level on listeners’ evaluations of a wind band performance. Journal of Band Research, 52(1), 12–28.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
49.
VurmaA.RajuM.KuudaA. (2011). Does timbre affect pitch? Estimations by musicians and non-musicians. Psychology of Music, 39(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610373602
WapnickJ.FreemanP. (1980). Effects of dark-bright timbral variation on the perception of flatness and sharpness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28(3), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345235
52.
WorthyM. D. (2000). Effects of tone-quality conditions on perception and performance of pitch among selected wind instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345395
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
