Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this replication study was to examine the effects of accompaniment on evaluations of solo instrumental performances. Although previous findings have indicated that instrumental music education majors’ evaluations of soloists were not independent of accompaniment, it is unknown whether more experienced evaluators are similarly affected by accompaniment. In addition to using a new population (in-service band directors), we also extended the previous study by asking participants whether they believed their evaluations of a soloist were influenced by the accompaniment provided. Participants (N = 58) listened to six excerpts of Haydn’s Concerto for Trumpet, which we created by pairing different recordings of solo trumpet performance (good or bad) with piano accompaniment (good, bad, or none). Participants evaluated the accuracy and expressivity of the soloist in each excerpt. Similar to the previous study, results indicated that participants discriminated between good and bad solo performances successfully, but a significant three-way interaction among solo, accompaniment, and order indicated that these differences were further influenced by the quality/presence of accompaniment and order. Most participants (72.4%) believed that their evaluations of the soloist were not influenced by the piano accompaniment, primarily because they were able to focus on the soloist or because they followed the instructions provided.

Keywords

accompaniment perception performance quality solo and ensemble solo performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergee

M. J.

Coffman

D. D.

Demorest

S. M.

Humphreys

J. T.

Thornton

L. P.

(2001). Influences on collegiate students’ decision to become a music educator. Retrieved from https://repository.asu.edu/items/17550

Bergee

M. J.

Platt

M. C.

(2003). Influence of selected variables on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 342–353. doi:10.2307/3345660

Blank

Davidson

(2007). An exploration of the effects of musical and social factors in piano duo collaborations. Psychology of Music, 35, 231–248. doi:10.1177/0305735607070306

Boyle

J. D.

Radocy

R. E.

(1987). Measurement and evaluation of musical experiences. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.

Brittin

R. V.

(2002). Instrumentalists’ assessment of solo performances with compact disc, piano, or no accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 63–74. doi:10.2307/3345693

Brittin

Sheldon

Lee

T. T.

(2002). Instrumentalists in Singapore: Assessment of solo performances with compact disc, piano, or no accompaniment. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319132

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

Cooksey

J. M.

(1982). Developing an objective approach to evaluating music performance. In Colwell

(Ed.), Symposium in music education: A festschrift for Charles Leonhard (pp. 197–229). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

10.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Davidson

J. W.

(2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo and duo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40, 595–633. doi:10.1177/0305735612449896

12.

Davidson

J. W.

Broughton

M. C.

(2016). Bodily mediated coordination, collaboration, and communication in music performance. In Hallam

Cross

Thaut

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed., pp. 573–595). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146

14.

Geringer

J. M.

Madsen

C. K.

(1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522–534. doi:10.2307/3345348

15.

Geringer

J. M.

Sasanfar

J. K.

(2013). Listener perception of expressivity in collaborative performances containing expressive and unexpressive playing by the pianist. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 160–174. doi:10.1177/0022429413485246

16.

Keller

P. E.

Appel

(2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of body movements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28, 27–46. doi:10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.27

17.

Klee

D. A.

(1999). The effect of computer-generated accompaniment on the preparation of solo flute literature. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 11, 59–70.

18.

Madsen

C. K.

Geringer

J. M.

(1999). Comparison of good versus bad tone quality/intonation of vocal and string performances: Issues concerning measurement and reliability of the Continuous Response Digital Interface. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 86–92. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318990

19.

Madsen

C. K.

Geringer

J. M.

Heller

J. J.

(1993). Comparison of good versus bad tone quality of accompanied and unaccompanied vocal and string performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 119, 93–100. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318617

20.

Meyers

B. D.

(2012). Attitudes of Arizona high school band students towards solo and ensemble activities. Journal of Band Research, 48(1), 30–44.

21.

Morrison

S. J.

(2016). Forum. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 395–396. doi:10.1177/0022429415625485

22.

Platz

Kopiez

(2012). When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Perception, 30, 71–83. doi:10.1525/MP.2012.30.1.71

23.

Pope

D. A.

Mick

J. P.

(2015). An analysis of ratings assigned to string musicians’ performances at solo and ensemble music performance assessment events. String Research Journal, 6(1), 37–54.

24.

Roussou

(2013). An exploration of the pianist’s multiple roles within the duo chamber ensemble. In Williamon

Goebl

(Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science (pp. 511–516). Brussels, Belgium: European Association of Conservatoires. Retrieved from http://www.performancescience.org/ISPS2013/Proceedings/

25.

Springer

D. G.

Silvey

B.A.

(2018). The role of accompaniment quality in the evaluation of solo instrumental performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66, 92–110. doi:10.1177/0022429418761044

26.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

27.

Tseng

S. A.

(1996). Solo accompaniments in instrumental music education: The impact of computer-controlled Vivace on flute student practice (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (9625203)

28.

Williamon

Davidson

J. W.

(2002). Exploring co-performer communication. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 53–72. doi:10.1177/102986490200600103

29.

Zdzinski

S. F.

(1991). Measurement of solo instrumental music performance: A review of literature. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 109, 47–58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318448

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

The Role of Accompaniment Quality in Band Directors’ Evaluations of Solo Instrumental Performance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material