Research investigating links between academic achievement and active music instruction has not previously differentiated between different types of instruction. In the current study, 155 seventh- and eighth-grade middle school band students were divided into two groups. Both groups received 2 months of instruction in jazz phrasing, scales, and vocabulary, but only the experimental group was taught to improvise. All instruction was part of the warm-up routine in regular band classes. All students were tested before and after instruction on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (cognitive flexibility) and the classic Stroop task (inhibitory control). At posttest, eighth-grade students in the experimental group scored significantly better on cognitive flexibility with a smaller percentage of perseverative errors, whereas the treatment had no effect on seventh-grade students on this outcome. Seventh graders, but not eighth graders, in the experimental group increased their posttest scores for inhibitory control, though this result was only marginally significant. In relation to previous research, the current results strongly suggest that far-transfer effects of active music participation depend on the nature of the instruction. Results of prior and future studies should therefore be interpreted in light of the type of music-making engaged by participants.
AlexanderM. L. (2012). Fearless improvisation: A pilot study to analyze string students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning improvisation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 25–33. http://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312457884
BeatyR. E.BenedekM.SilviaP. J.SchacterD. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
5.
Bergman NutleyS.DarkiF.KlingbergT. (2014). Music practice is associated with development of working memory during childhood and adolescence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 926. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00926
6.
BerlinerP. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
7.
BialystokE.DePapeA.-M. (2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 565–574. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012735
8.
BugosJ. A.PerlsteinW. M.McCraeC. S.BrophyT. S.BedenbaughP. H. (2007). Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 11, 464–471. http://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086504
9.
BuitenwegJ. I. V.MurreJ. M. J.RidderinkhofK. R. (2012). Brain training in progress: A review of trainability in healthy seniors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00183
10.
ChobertJ.FrançoisC.VelayJ. L.BessonM. (2014). Twelve months of active musical training in 8-to 10-year-old children enhances the preattentive processing of syllabic duration and voice onset time. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 956–967. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs377
11.
Cogo-MoreiraH.De ÁvilaC. R. B.PloubidisG. B.MariJ. D. J. (2013). Effectiveness of music education for the improvement of reading skills and academic achievement in young poor readers: a pragmatic cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59984. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059984
12.
DegéF.KubicekC.SchwarzerG. (2011). Music lessons and intelligence: A relation mediated by executive functions. Music Perception, 29, 195–201.
13.
DhakalK.NorgaardM.AdhikariB. M.YunK. S.DhamalaM. (2019). Higher Node Activity with Less Functional Connectivity During Musical Improvisation. Brain Connectivity, 9(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0566
DuerrW. J. (2016). The effect of executive function on instrumental performance of beginning wind and brass students. Unpublished dissertation for a Doctor of Education in Learning and Teaching, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY. ProQuest Number: 10103742.
16.
EdlS.BenedekM.PapousekI.WeissE. M.FinkA. (2014). Creativity and the Stroop interference effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 38–42. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.009
17.
EllamilM.DobsonC.BeemanM.ChristoffK. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59, 1783–1794. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
18.
ElpusK. (2013). Is it the music or is it selection bias? A nationwide analysis of music and non-music students’ SAT scores. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 175–194. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413485601
19.
HabibiA.DamasioA.IlariB.SachsM. E.DamasioH. (2018). Music training and child development: A review of recent findings from a longitudinal study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13606
20.
HallamS. (2010). The power of music: Its impact on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 269–289. http://doi.org/10.1177/0255761410370658
21.
Hanna-PladdyB.MacKayA. (2011). The relation between instrumental musical activity and cognitive aging. Neuropsychology, 25, 378–386. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0021895
22.
HansenN. C.VuustP.PearceM. (2016). “If You Have to Ask, You’ll Never Know”: Effects of Specialised Stylistic Expertise on Predictive Processing of Music. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0163584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163584
23.
HolochwostS. J.PropperC. B.WolfD. P.WilloughbyM. T.FisherK. R.KolaczJ.. . . JaffeeS. R. (2017). Music education, academic achievement, and executive functions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 147–166. http://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000112
24.
KrausN.SlaterJ.ThompsonE. C.HornickelJ.StraitD. L.NicolT.White-SchwochT. (2014). Music enrichment programs improve the neural encoding of speech in at-risk children. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 11913–11918. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1881-14.2014
25.
KurtP.YenerG.OguzM. (2011). Impaired digit span can predict further cognitive decline in older people with subjective memory complaint: A preliminary result. Aging & Mental Health, 15, 364–369. http://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.536133
26.
LyversM.Tobias-WebbJ. (2010). Effects of acute alcohol consumption on executive cognitive functioning in naturalistic settings. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 1021–1028. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.06.022
27.
MacleodC. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
28.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
29.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. http://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
30.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
MoradzadehL.BlumenthalG.WiseheartM. (2015). Musical training, bilingualism, and executive function: A closer look at task switching and dual-task performance. Cognitive Science, 39, 992–1020. http://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12183
32.
MorenoS.BialystokE.BaracR.SchellenbergE. G.CepedaN. J.ChauT. (2011). Short-term music training enhances verbal intelligence and executive function. Psychological Science, 22, 1425–1433. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416999
33.
MorenoS.BidelmanG. M. (2014). Examining neural plasticity and cognitive benefit through the unique lens of musical training. Hearing Research, 308, 84–97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.09.012
34.
MorenoS.MarquesC.SantosA.SantosM.CastroS. L.BessonM. (2009). Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 712–723. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn120
35.
MuellerS. T.PiperB. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
36.
NelsonC. A.LucianaM. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
37.
NorgaardM. (2011). Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 109–127. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411405669
NorgaardM. (2017). Developing musical creativity through improvisation in the large performance classroom. Music Educators Journal, 103(3), 34–39. http://doi.org/10.1177/0027432116687025
40.
NorgaardM.EmersonS. N.DawnK.FidlonJ. (2016). Creating under pressure: Effects of divided attention on the improvised output of skilled jazz pianists. Music Perception, 33, 561–570.
41.
NyhusE.BarcelóF. (2009). The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: A critical update. Brain and Cognition, 71, 437–451. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.03.005
42.
PatelA. D. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 142. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142
43.
PinhoA. L.UllénF.Castelo-BrancoM.FranssonP.De ManzanoÖ. (2016). Addressing a paradox: Dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective networks. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3052–3063. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv130
44.
PiperB. J.LiV.EiwazM. A.KobelY. VBeniceT. S.ChuA. M.. . . MuellerS. T. (2011). Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 110–123.
45.
PressingJ. (1988). Improvisation: Methods and model. In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 129–178). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
SalaG.GobetF. (2017). When the music’s over. Does music skill transfer to children’s and young adolescents’ cognitive and academic skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 20, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.005
47.
SchellenbergE. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15, 511–514.
48.
SchellenbergE. G. (2011). Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 283–302.
49.
SeinfeldS.FigueroaH.Ortiz-GilJ.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2013). Effects of music learning and piano practice on cognitive function, mood and quality of life in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00810
50.
SlevcL. R.DaveyN. S.BuschkuehlM.JaeggiS. M. (2016). Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition, 152, 199–211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017
51.
TienA. Y.SpevackT. VJonesD. W.PearlsonG. D.SchlaepferT. E.StraussM. E. (1996). Computerized Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 12, 479–485.
52.
TravisF.HarungH. S.LagrosenY. (2011). Moral development, executive functioning, peak experiences and brain patterns in professional and amateur classical musicians: Interpreted in light of a unified theory of performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1256–1264. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.020
53.
Van der ElstW. (2006). The Stroop Color-Word Test: Influence of age, sex, and education; and normative data for a large sample across the adult age range. Assessment, 13, 62–79. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283427
54.
VuustP.BratticoE.SeppänenM.NäätänenR.TervaniemiM. (2012). The sound of music: Differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1432–1443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.028
55.
Wehr-FlowersE. (2006). Differences between male and female students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 337–349.
56.
WhiteE. J.HutkaS. A.WilliamsL. J.MorenoS. (2013). Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: Implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 90. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00090
57.
ZabelinaD. L.RobinsonM. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 136–143. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0017379
58.
ZengT.PrzysindaE.PfeiferC.ArkinC.LouiP. (2017). White matter connectivity reflects success in musical improvisation. bioRxiv, 218024. http://doi.org/10.1101/218024
59.
ZukJ.BenjaminC.KenyonA.GaabN. (2014). Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e99868. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099868
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
