The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pitch and rhythm priming tasks on sight-reading accuracy and fluency. High school wind instrumentalists (N = 182) were assigned to one of four experimental groups: pre-/posttest rhythm, pre-/posttest pitch, posttest-only rhythm, or posttest-only pitch. Participants sight-read selected stimulus exercises from the Watkins-Farnum Performance Scale and completed two priming treatments and a control condition as part of a repeated-measures design. A three-way repeated-measures MANOVA, with rhythm accuracy, pitch accuracy, and fluency accuracy as dependent measures, revealed a significant main effect due to priming condition. Rhythm accuracy scores were significantly lower after both perceptual and conceptual priming than after a control condition. No significant differences in pitch accuracy or fluency existed based on priming condition. No significant differences were found in rhythm, pitch, or fluency accuracy based on treatment condition (pitch or rhythm) or exposure condition (pre-/posttest or post only). Two-way repeated-measures MANOVAs revealed significant main effects based on time. Pitch accuracy and fluency each significantly improved between pre- and posttest and from the first to third study tasks. Results suggest that performing rhythm alone or pitch alone requires different cognitive processes than does performing both together.
AlexanderM. L.HenryM. (2012). The development of a string sight-reading pitch skill hierarchy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 201–216. doi:10.1177/0022429412446375
2.
AlexanderM. L.HenryM. L. (2015). The effect of pitch and rhythm difficulty on high school string sight-reading performance. String Research Journal, 6, 71–83. doi:10.1177/194849921500600005
3.
BainbridgeJ. V.LewandowskyS.KirsnerK. (1993). Context effects in repetition priming are sense effects. Memory and Cognition, 21, 619–626. doi:10.3758/BF03197194
4.
BebeauM. J. (1982). Effects of traditional and simplified methods of rhythm-reading instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 107–119. doi:10.2307/3345042
5.
BoyleJ. D. (1969). Rhythm sight reading: The key to music sight reading. Instrumentalist, 24(2), 42–43.
6.
BoyleJ. D. (1970). The effect of prescribed rhythmical movements on the ability to read music at sight. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 307–318. doi:10.2307/3344498
7.
CassidyJ. W. (1993). Effects of various sightsinging strategies on nonmusic majors’ pitch accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 293–302. doi:10.2307/3345505
8.
CassidyJ. W.BettsS.HanberryM. A. (2001). The effect of structured left hand practice on piano performance accuracy among undergraduate music majors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 148, 31–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319075
9.
ChaffinC. (2011). An examination of the cognitive workload associated with conducting in an instrumental music context: A review of literature. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 73–87. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/bulcouresmused.189.0073
10.
ColleyB. (1987). A comparison of syllabic methods for improving rhythm literacy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 221–235. doi:10.2307/3345075
11.
CriderP. A. (1989). Sight-reading: Is it a lost art?Instrumentalist, 43(10), 29–35.
12.
DellG. S.RatcliffR.McKoonG. (1981). Study and test repetition effects in item recognition priming. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 497–511. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1422259
13.
DrakeC.PalmerC. (2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: Relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74, 1–32. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00061-x
14.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
15.
ElliotC. A. (1982a). The identification and classification of instrumental performance sight-reading errors. Journal of Band Research, 18(1), 36–42. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1312121443
16.
ElliotC. A. (1982b). The relationships among instrumental sight-reading ability and seven selected predictor variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 5–14. doi:10.2307/3344862
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–250. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_3
18.
GoolsbyT. W. (1994). Profiles of processing: Eye movements during sightreading. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 97–123. Retrieved from http://jstor.org/stable/40285757
19.
GromkoJ. E. (2004). Predictors of music sight-reading ability in high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 6–15. doi:10.2307/3345521
20.
GrutzmacherP. A. (1987). The effect of tonal pattern training on the aural perception, reading recognition, and melodic sight-reading achievement of first-year instrumental students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 171–181. doi:10.2307/3344959
21.
GudmundsdottirH. R. (2010). Pitch error analysis of young piano students’ music reading performances. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 61–70. doi:10.1177/0255761409351342
22.
HahnL. (1987). Music reading and language reading: Correlations in processes and instruction. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 93, 41–48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318164
23.
HanberryM. (2004). Effects of practice strategies, metronome use, meter, hand, and musical function on dual-staved piano performance accuracy and practice time usage of undergraduate non-keyboard music majors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04082004-223228/
24.
HaywardC. M.GromkoJ. E. (2009). Relationships among music sight-reading and technical proficiency, spatial visualization, and aural discrimination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 26–36. doi:10.1177/0022429409332677
25.
HenryM. (2001). The development of a vocal sight-reading inventory. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 21–35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.ord/stable/40319097
HenryM. (2004). The use of targeted pitch skills for sight-singing instruction in the choral rehearsal. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 206–217. doi:10.2307/3345855
28.
HenryM. (2011). The effect of pitch and rhythm difficulty on vocal sight-reading performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 72–84. doi:10.1177/0022429410397199
HenryM.DemorestS. (1994). Individual sight-singing achievement in successful choral ensembles. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13(1), 4–8. doi:10.1177/875512339401300102
31.
HodgesD. A. (1992). The acquisition of music reading skills. In ColwellR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 466–471). New York, NY: Schirmer Books.
32.
HodgesD. A.NolkerD. B. (2011). The acquisition of music reading skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning: Volume 2. Applications (pp. 61–91). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
JungersM. (2007). Performance priming in music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 395–399. doi:10.1525/mp.2007.24.4.395
34.
KellerP. E. (2001). Attentional resource allocation in musical ensemble performance. Psychology of Music, 29, 20–38. doi:10.1177/0305735601291003
35.
KopiezR.LeeJ. I. (2006). Towards a dynamic model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 8, 97–120. doi:10.1080/14613800600570785
36.
KostkaM. J. (2000). The effects of error-detection practice on keyboard sight-reading achievement of undergraduate music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 114–122. doi:10.2307/3345570
37.
LambrechtB. (2008). Sightreading, a year-long approach. Instrumentalist, 62(6), 32–37.
38.
LeeH. Y.WangY. S. (2011). Visual processing of music notation: A study of event-related potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112, 525–535. doi:10.2466/11.22.24.27.PMS.112.2.525-535
39.
LehmannA. C.EricssonK. A. (1993). Sight-reading ability of expert pianists in the context of piano accompanying. Psychomusicology, 12, 182–195. doi:10.1037/h0094108
40.
LomaxR. G.Hahs-VaughnD. L. (2012). Statistical concepts: A second course. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
MacKnightC. B. (1975). Music reading ability of beginning wind instrumentalists after melodic instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 23–34. doi:10.2307/3345200
42.
MarmelF.TillmannB. (2009). Tonal priming beyond tonics. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 211–221. doi:10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.211
43.
MartensS.WoltersG. (2002). Interference in implicit memory caused by processing of interpolated material. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 169–185. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1423433
44.
McPhersonG. E. (1994). Factors and abilities influencing sightreading skill in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 217–231. doi:10.2307/3345701
45.
MeinzE. J.HambrickD. Z. (2010). Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: The role of working memory capacity. Psychological Science, 21, 914–919. doi:10.1177/0956797610373933
46.
MishraJ. (2014). Improving sightreading accuracy: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 42, 131–156. doi:10.1177/0305735612463770
47.
NeuhausC.KnӧscheT. R. (2008). Processing of pitch and time sequences in music. Neuroscience Letters, 441, 11–15. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.101
48.
PaasF. G. W. C.van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 351–371. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23359294
49.
PalmerM. (1976). Relative effectiveness of two approaches to rhythm reading for fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 110–118. doi:10.2307/3345154
50.
PierceM. A. (1992). The effects of learning procedure, tempo, and performance condition on transfer of rhythm skills in instrumental music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 295–305. doi:10.2307/3345837
51.
PikeP. D.CarterR. (2010). Employing cognitive chunking techniques to enhance sight-reading performance of undergraduate group-piano students. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 231–246. doi:10.1177/0255761410373886
52.
Poulin-CharronnatB.BigandE.MadurellF. (2005). The influence of voice leading on harmonic priming. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 613–627. doi:10.1525/mp.2005.22.4.613
53.
PriceH. E.BlantonF.ParrishR. T. (1998). Effects of two instructional methods on high school band students’ sight-reading proficiency, music performance, and attitude. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(1), 14–20. doi:10.1177/875512339801700104
ReifingerJ. L. (2012). The acquisition of sight-singing skills in second-grade general music: Effects of using solfège and of relating tonal patterns to songs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 26–42. doi:10.1177/0022429411435683
56.
SalzbergR. S.WangC. C. (1989). A comparison of prompts to aid rhythmic sight-reading of string students. Psychology of Music, 17, 123–131. doi:10.1177/0305735689172003
57.
SchacterD. L.BucknerR. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185–195. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80448-1
58.
SchӧnD.BessonM. (2002). Processing pitch and duration in music reading: A RT-ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 868-878. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00170-1
SlowiaczekL.M.HamburgerM. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239–1250. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1239
WatersA. J.TownsendE.UnderwoodG. (1998). Expertise in music sight reading: A study of pianists. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 123–149. doi:10.1111/j.2044p-8295.1998.tb02676.x
63.
WatkinsJ. G.FarnumS. E. (1954/1962) The Watkins-Farnum Performance Scale. Winona, MN: Hal Leonard.
64.
WiggsC. L.MartinA. (1998). Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 227–233. Retrieved from http://biomednet.com/elecref/0959438800800227
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
