This meta-analytic study examined the validity of Gordon’s music aptitude tests as predictors of other musical variables. The four tests analyzed were the Music Aptitude Profile (1965), Primary Measures of Music Audiation (1979), Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation (1982), and Advanced Measures of Music Audiation (1989). Separate analyses were performed for tonal, rhythm, and composite constructs of music aptitude. From 47 music education journal articles that met requirements for inclusion, 215 independent data points representing 6,086 participants were collapsed into an overriding set of five criterion categories: (a) aural perception, (b) achievement, (c) creativity, (d) affective outcomes, and (e) musical engagement. Moderators potentially affecting validity included audiation type, sampling method, grade level, criterion test type, and year of publication. Results revealed estimated true criterion-related validities of .45 (tonal), .46 (rhythm), and .53 (composite). Gordon’s music aptitude tests were consistently but not always strongly associated with many desirable musical outcomes. Analysis of correlations by subtest and criterion category produced mixed results, and high levels of between-study heterogeneity could not be explained through meta-regression moderator analysis.
*ApfelstadtH. (1984). Effects of melodic perception instruction on pitch discrimination and vocal accuracy of kindergarten children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 15–24. doi:10.2307/3345277
2.
*AuhM. S. (1997). Prediction of musical creativity in composition among selected variables for upper elementary students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 1–8.
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
*BrandM. (1986). Relationship between home musical environment and selected musical attributes of second-grade children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 111–120. doi:10.2307/3344739
5.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
*CarrollD. W. (1987). Development and evaluation of a programmed-like text with accompanying audio cassette tapes as an ancillary to elementary beginning snare drum classes. Contributions to Music Education, 14, 1–8.
7.
ColwellR.AbrahamsF. (1991). Edwin Gordon’s contribution: An appraisal. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2(1/2), 19–36.
8.
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 3.3) [Computer software]. (2018). Englewood, NJ: Biostat. Available from https://www.meta-analysis.com
9.
CutiettaR. A. (1991). Edwin Gordon’s impact on the field of music aptitude. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 73–77.
10.
*DelzellJ. K.RohwerD. A.BallardD. E. (1999). Effects of melodic pattern difficulty and performance experience on ability to play by ear. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 53–63. doi:10.2307/3345828
11.
*DomerJ.GromkoJ. E. (1996). Qualitative changes in preschoolers’ invented notations following music instruction. Contributions to Music Education, 23, 62–78.
12.
*DravesT. J. (2008). Music achievement, self-esteem, and aptitude in a college songwriting class. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 178, 35–46.
13.
*FitchW. T.RosenfeldA. J. (2007). Perception and production of syncopated rhythms. Music Perception, 25, 43–58. doi:10.1525/mp.2007.25.1.43
14.
ForsytheR. (1984). The development and implementation of a computerized preschool measure of musical audiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.
15.
*FrosethJ. O. (1971). Using MAP scores in the instruction of beginning students in instrumental music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 98–105. doi:10.2307/3344119
16.
GordonE. (1965). Music Aptitude Profile. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
17.
GordonE. (1967). The Music Aptitude Profile. Music Educators Journal, 53(6), 52–54.
18.
*GordonE. (1970a). First-year results of a five-year longitudinal study of the musical achievement of culturally disadvantaged students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 195–213. doi:10.2307/3344459
19.
GordonE. (1970b). Taking into account music aptitude differences among beginning instrumental music students. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 41–53. doi:10.3102/00028312007001041
20.
GordonE. E. (1975). Fifth-year and final results of a five-year longitudinal study of the musical achievement of culturally disadvantaged students. Experimental Research in the Psychology of Music: Studies in the Psychology of Music, 10, 24–52.
21.
GordonE. E. (1979). Primary Measures of Music Audiation. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
22.
GordonE. E. (1980). Developmental music aptitudes among inner-city primary children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 63, 25–30.
23.
GordonE. E. (1982). Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
24.
*GordonE. E. (1984). A longitudinal predictive validity study of the Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 78, 1–23.
25.
*GordonE. E. (1985). Research studies in audiation: I. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 84, 34–50.
26.
GordonE. E. (1989a). Advanced Measures of Music Audiation. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
27.
GordonE. E. (1989b). Predictive validity studies of the Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation and the Instrument Timbre Preference Test. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
28.
GordonE. E. (1990). Predictive validity study of AMMA. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
29.
GordonE. E. (1997). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content, and patterns. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
30.
GordonE. E. (1998). Introduction to research and the psychology of music. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
31.
GordonE. E. (1999). All about audiation and music aptitudes. Music Educators Journal, 86, 41–44. doi:10.2307/3399589
32.
GordonE. E. (2004). Continuing studies in music aptitudes. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
33.
GordonE. E. (2006). The legacy of Carl E. Seashore. In GfellerK. (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on musicality: Essays from the Seashore Symposium (pp. 51–61). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa School of Music.
34.
GrashelJ. (2008). The measurement of musical aptitude in 20th century United States: A brief history. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 176, 45–49.
35.
*GromkoJ. E. (2004). Predictors of music sight-reading ability in high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 6–15. doi:10.2307/3345521
36.
*GromkoJ. E.HansenD.TortoraA. H.HigginsD.BocciaE. (2009). Effects of temporal sequencing and auditory discrimination on children’s memory patterns for tones, numbers, and nonsense words. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 140–151. doi:10.1177/0022429409335891
37.
*GromkoJ. E.PoormanA. S. (1998). The effect of music training on preschoolers’ spatial-temporal task performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 173–181. doi:10.2307/3345621
38.
*GromkoJ. E.RussellC. (2002). Relationships among young children’s aural perception, listening condition, and accurate reading of graphic listening maps. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 333–342. doi:10.2307/3345359
39.
HaroutounianJ. (2002). Kindling the spark: Recognizing and developing musical talent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
*HarrisonC. S. (1990). Predicting music theory grades: The relative efficiency of academic ability, music experience, and musical aptitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 124–137. doi:10.2307/3344932
41.
*HarrisonC. S. (1990). Relationships between grades in the components of freshman music theory and selected background variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 175–186. doi:10.2307/3345181
42.
*HarrisonC. S.AsmusE. P.SerpeR. T. (1994). Effects of musical aptitude, academic ability, music experience, and motivation on aural skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 131–144. doi:10.2307/3345497
43.
*HaywardC. M.GromkoJ. E. (2009). Relationships among music sight-reading and technical proficiency, spatial visualization, and aural discrimination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 26–36. doi:10.1177/0022429409332677
44.
*HenryW. (2002). The effects of pattern instruction, repeated composing opportunities, and musical aptitude on the compositional process and product of fourth-grade students. Contributions to Music Education, 29(1), 9–28.
45.
*HornbachC. M.TaggartC. C. (2005). The relationship between developmental tonal aptitude and singing achievement among kindergarten, first-, second-, and third-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 322–331. doi:10.2307/3648430
46.
HumphreysJ. T. (1993). Precursors of musical aptitude testing: From the Greeks through the work of Francis Galton. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 315–327. doi:10.2307/3345507
47.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
JensenA. R. (1987). Individual differences in mental ability. In GloverJ. A.RonningR. R. (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology (pp. 61–88). New York, NY: Plenum Publishing.
49.
*Jordan-DeCarboJ. (1982). Same/different discrimination techniques, readiness training, pattern treatment, and sex on aural discrimination and singing of tonal patterns by kindergartners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 237–246. doi:10.2307/3345297
50.
*KlinedinstR. E. (1991). Predicting performance achievement and retention of fifth-grade instrumental students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 225–238. doi:10.2307/3344722
51.
*KratusJ. (1994). Relationships among children’s music audiation and their compositional processes and products. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 115–130. doi:10.2307/3345496
52.
MartellaR. C.NelsonJ. R.MorganR. L.Marchand-MartellaN. E. (2013). Understanding and interpreting educational research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
*MartinB. A. (1991). Effects of hand signs, syllables, and letters on first graders’ acquisition of tonal skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 161–170. doi:10.2307/3344696
54.
McPhersonG.EvansP. (2014). Music education. In ThompsonW. F. (Ed.), Music in the social and behavioral sciences: An encyclopedia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
55.
MehrS. A. (2014). Music in the home: new evidence for an intergenerational link. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 78–88. doi:10.1177/0022429413520008
56.
*MikszaP. (2005). The effect of mental practice on the performance achievement of high school trombonists. Contributions to Music Education, 32(1), 75–93.
57.
MishraJ. (2014). Factors related to sight-reading accuracy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 452–465. doi:10.1177/0022429413508585
58.
*MotaG. (1997). Detecting young children’s musical aptitude: A comparison between standardized measures of music aptitude and ecologically valid musical performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 89–94.
*NorrisC. (2000). Factors related to the validity of reproduction tonal memory tests. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 52–64. doi:10.2307/3345456
61.
*NortonD. (1980). Interrelationships among music aptitude, IQ, and auditory conservation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 207–217. doi:10.2307/3345029
62.
*PhillipsK. H.AitchisonR. E. (1997). The relationship of singing accuracy to pitch discrimination and tonal aptitude among third-grade students. Contributions to Music Education, 24(1), 7–22.
63.
*PhillipsK.AitchisonR.NompulaY. (2002). The relationship of music aptitude to singing achievement among fifth-grade students. Contributions to Music Education, 29(1), 47–58.
64.
*PollatouE.KaradimouK.GerodimosV. (2005). Gender differences in music aptitude, rhythmic ability, and motor performance in preschool children. Early Childhood Development and Care, 175, 361–369. doi:10.1080/0300443042000270786
65.
*RutkowskiJ. (1996). The effectiveness of individual/small-group singing activities on kindergartners’ use of singing voice and developmental music aptitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 353–368. doi:10.2307/3345447
66.
*RutkowskiJ. (2015). The relationship between children’s use of singing voice and singing accuracy. Music Perception, 32, 283-292. doi:10.1525/mp.2015.32.3.283
67.
*SandersP. D. (2000). Music self-concept, music aptitude, and music background of non-music majors. Contributions to Music Education, 27(2), 9–21.
68.
*SchleuterS. L. (1993). The relationship of AMMA scores to sightsinging, dictation, and SAT scores of university music majors. Contributions to Music Education, 20, 57–63.
69.
*SchleuterS. L.SchleuterL. J. (1978). A predictive study of an experimental college version of the Musical Aptitude Profile with music achievement of non-music majors. Contributions to Music Education, 6, 2–8.
70.
*SchleuterS. L.SchleuterL. J. (1989). The relationship of rhythm response tasks and PMMA scores with music training, grade level, and sex among K-3 students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 100, 1–13.
71.
*SchmidtC.SinorJ. (1986). An investigation of the relationships among music audiation, musical creativity, and cognitive style. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 160–172. doi:10.2307/3344746
72.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
SeashoreC. E. (1919). Seashore measures of musical talent. New York, NY: Columbia Phonograph Company.
74.
*StamouL.SchmidtC. P.HumphreysJ. T. (2010). Standardization of the Gordon Primary Measures of Music Audiation in Greece. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 75–89. doi:10.1177/0022429409360574
75.
StringhamD. A.SnellA. H.IIGrunowR. F. (2011). A multi-phase examination of Advanced Measures of Music Audiation at three American schools of music. Audea, 16(2), 9–17.
76.
*VispoelW. P.CoffmanD. D. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29–49.
77.
WaltersD. L. (1991). Edwin Gordon’s music aptitude work. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2(1–2), 64–72.
78.
WatkinsJ. G.FarnumS. E. (1954). The Watkins-Farnum Performance Scale: A standardized achievement test for all band instruments. Milwaukee WI: Hal Leonard.
79.
WebsterP. (1983). An assessment of musical imagination in young children. In TallaricoP. (Ed.), Contributions to symposium/83: The Bowling Green State University symposium on music teaching and learning (pp. 100–123). Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University
80.
WebsterP. R. (1988). New perspectives on music aptitude and achievement. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research In Music Cognition, 7(2), 177–194. doi:10.1037/h0094169
81.
WoodruffL. C. (1983). A predictive validity study of the Primary Measures of Music Audiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.
82.
*YoungW. T. (1976). A longitudinal comparison of four music achievement and music aptitude tests. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 97–109. doi:10.2307/3345153
83.
*ZdzinskiS. F. (1992). Relationships among parental involvement, music aptitude, and musical achievement of instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 114–125. doi:10.2307/3345561
84.
*ZdzinskiS. F. (1996). Parental involvement, selected student attributes, and learning outcomes in instrumental music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 34–48. doi:10.2307/3345412
85.
*ZdzinskiS. F. (2002). Parental involvement, musical achievement, and music attitudes of vocal and instrumental music students. Contributions to Music Education, 29(2), 29–45.
86.
*ZelenakM. S. (2015). Measuring the sources of self-efficacy among secondary school music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 389–404. doi:10.1177/0022429414555018
87.
ZellerR. A.CarminesE. G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
