The way an improviser practices is a vital and significant aspect to a musician’s means and capacities of expression. Expert music performers utilize extensive self-regulatory processes involving planning, strategic development, and systemized approaches to learning and reflective practice. Scholars posit that these processes are constructivist and socioculturally explained and manifest in individual, jointly negotiated, and shared learning. This qualitative study explores the regulatory processes of four prominent Australian improvising musician-educators and four tertiary improvisation students. Expert and developing musicians’ processes in learning and teaching improvised music-making were investigated through observations of self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation strategies. I identified and analyzed regulatory learning strategies located from practice, training, and experience using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings suggest insights of evolving self-regulative behavior that are dynamic, task-specific, personalised, and contextually contingent across individual and collaborative tasks and activity. An integrative regulatory model of learning offers guidance and reflection of metacognitive flow within a social constructed view of learning. Implications for researchers and educators are drawn for meaningful educational practice by knowing and understanding expert improvisers’ complex concepts of self-regulation, critical thinking, problem solving, and the evolution and evaluation of creative processes in improvisers.
AshworthP. (1999). “Bracketing” in phenomenology: Renouncing assumptions in hearing about student cheating. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 707–721. doi:10.1080/095183999235845
2.
BarrettM.StaufferS. (2009). Narrative inquiry in music education: Troubling certainty. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
3.
BerlinerP. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BickerstaffD. L.ThompsonA. R. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 214–224. doi:10.1080/14780880802314304
5.
BroadbentJ. R. (2013). “The bereaved therapist speaks”: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of humanistic therapists’ experiences of a significant personal bereavement and its impact upon their therapeutic practice. An exploratory study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13, 263–271. doi:10.1080/14733145.2013.768285
CharmazK. (2003). Grounded theory. In SmithJ. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London, England: Sage.
8.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
de BruinL. R. (2015). Theory and practice in idea generation and creativity in jazz improvisation, Australian Journal of Music Education, 2, 91–106. doi:10.1080/14613808.2016.1204279
11.
de BruinL. R. (2016). Expert voices in learning improvisation: Shaping regulation processes through experiential influence. Music Education Research, 19, 384–397. doi:10.1080/14613808.2016.1204279.
GallagherS.ZahaviD. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
14.
GauntH. (2010). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38, 178–208. doi:10.1177/0305735609339467
15.
GordonE. (1989). Audiation, music learning theory, music aptitude and creativity. In RichmondJ. W. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Suncoast Music Education Forum on Creativity (pp. 75–81). Tampa: University of South Florida.
HadwinA. F.JärveläS.MillerM. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In ZimmermanJ.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HadwinA. F.OshigeK. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulation learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/library
19.
HallamS. (2006). Music psychology in education. London, England: Institute of Education, University of London.
20.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
JärveläS.JärvenojaH.VeermansM. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.012
23.
JärveläS.VoletS.JärvenojaH. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15–27. doi:10.1080/00461520903433539
24.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
JorgensenE. (2009). On thick description and narrative enquiry in music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 31, 69–81. doi:10.1177/1321103X09103632
26.
KemplerT. M.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2007). Exploring self-regulation in group contexts. In ChinnC. A.ErkensG.PuntambekarS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 357–360). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
27.
KennyB. J.GellrichM. (2002). Improvisation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 117–134). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
KingA. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323. doi:10.3102/00028312029002303
29.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/1163370
30.
KitsantasA.KavussanuM. (2011). Acquisition of sport knowledge and skill. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 217–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
KratusJ. (1995). A developmental approach to teaching music improvisation. International Journal of Music Education, 26, 27–38. doi:10.1177/025576149502600103
32.
Labouvie-ViefG. (1980). Beyond formal operations: Uses and limits of pure logic in life-span development. Human Development, 23(3), 141–161. doi:10.1159/000272546
33.
LarkinM.WattsS.CliftonE. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120.
LevitinD. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: Understanding a human obsession. New York, NY: Atlantic Books.
36.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
ManloveS.LazonderA. W.JongT. D. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 87–98. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00162.x
38.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
McCaslinM. (2004). Co-regulation of opportunity, activity, and identity in student motivation: Elaborations on Vygotskian themes. In McInerneyD. M.Van EttenS. (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Vol. 4. Big theories revisited (pp. 249–274). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
40.
McCaslinM. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44, 137–146. doi:10.1080/00461520902832384
41.
McCaslinM.HickeyD. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygoskian view. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
McPhersonG. E.DavidsonJ. W.FaulknerR. (2012). Music in our lives: Rethinking musical ability, development and identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
McPhersonG.NielsenS.RenwickJ. (2013). Self-regulation interventions and the development of music expertise. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 355–382). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
44.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2011). Self-regulation and mastery of musical skills. In ZimmermanJ.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 234–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1990). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
MithaugD. E. (1993). Self-regulation theory: How optimal adjustment maximizes gain. Westport, CT: Praeger.
47.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
NielsenS. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3, 155–167. doi:10.1080/14613800120089223
49.
NielsenS. G. (2008). Achievement goals, learning strategies and instrumental performance. Music Education Research, 10, 235–247. doi:10.1080/14613800802079106
50.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
51.
PekrunR.GoetzT.TitzW.PerryR. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
52.
PerryN. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715. doi:00004760-199812000-00011
53.
PiagetJ. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibrium of cognitive structures. New York, NY: Viking.
54.
PintrichP. R.ZushoA. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55.
PothoulakiJ.MacDonaldR.FlowersP. (2012). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of an improvisational music therapy program for cancer patients. Journal of Music Therapy, 49, 45–67. doi:10.1093/jmt/49.1.45
56.
PressingJ. (1988). Improvisation: Methods and models. In SlobodaJ. (Ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 129–178). New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
57.
PrinceM. J.FelderR. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830. 2006.tb00884.x
ProutyK. E. (2012). Knowing jazz: Community, pedagogy and canon in the information age. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
61.
RandlesC. (2009). “That’s my piece, that’s my signature, and it means more . . .”: Creativity identity and the ensemble teacher/arranger. Research Studies in Music Education, 31, 52–68. doi:10.1177/8755123312436988
62.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V.del RioP.AlvarezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SarathE. (2002). Improvisation and curricular reform. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 188–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64.
SawyerK. (2005). Music and conversation. In MiellD.MacDonaldR.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 45–60). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1983). Child as co-investigator: Helping children gain insight into their own mental processes. In ParisS.OlsenG.StevensonH. (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
SchoorC.NarcissS.KörndleH. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50, 97–119. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540
67.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self- regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self- regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
69.
SchwartzD. L.ChaseC.ChinD. B.OppezzoM.KwongH.OkitaS.WagsterJ. D. (2009). Interactive metacognition: Monitoring and regulating a teachable agent. In HackerD. J.DunloskyJ.GraesserA. C. (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 340–359). London, England: Routledge.
70.
SmithJ. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In SmithJ. A.HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). London, England: Sage.
71.
SmithJ. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 39–54. doi:10.1191/1478088704qp004oa
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London, England: Sage.
74.
TanJ.BiswasG. (2006). The role of feedback in preparation for future learning: A case study in learning by teaching environments. In IkedaM.AshleyK.ChanT.-W. (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 370–381). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
75.
TulvingE. (2005). Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human? In TerranceH.MetcalfeJ. (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 3–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76.
VarelaW.AbramiP. C.UpitisR. (2016). Self-regulation and music learning: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 44, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0305735614554639
77.
VaurasM.IiskalaT.KajamiesA.KinnunenR.LehtinenE. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19–37. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/psysoc/46/1/46_1_19/_pdf
78.
VoletS.SummersM.ThurmanJ. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
79.
VoletS.VaurasM.SalonenP. (2009). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44, 215–226. doi:10.1080/00461520903213584
80.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes (ColeM.John-SteinerV.SoubermanE., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930)
81.
Ward-SteinmanP. M. (2007). Confidence in teaching improvisation according to the K–12 achievement standards: Surveys of vocal jazz workshop participants and undergraduates. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 172, 25–40. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/40319363
82.
Ward-SteinmanP. M. (2008a). Vocal improvisation and creative thinking by Australian and American university jazz singers: A factor analytic study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 5–17. doi:10.1177/0022429408322458
83.
Ward-SteinmanP. M. (2008b). Vocal improvisation by Australian and American university jazz singers: Case studies of outliers’ musical influences. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 177, 29–43. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/40319450
84.
Ward-SteinmanP. M. (2014). The vocal improviser-educator: An analysis of selected American and Australian educators’ influences and pedagogical views. International Journal of Music Education, 32, 346–359. doi:10.1177/0255761413515801
85.
WebsterP. (2002). Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. In SullivanT.WillinghamL. (Eds.), Creativity and music education (pp. 16–33). Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
86.
WeinbergerA.StegmannK.FischerF. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
87.
WertschJ. V. (2007). Mediation. In DanielsH.ColeM.WertschJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
88.
WinneP. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89.
YinR, K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90.
ZimmermanB. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. doi:00004760-198909000-00007
91.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekartsM.PintrichP.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic.
ZimmermanB. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/200456437?accountid=12528
94.
ZimmermanB. J.BonnerS.KovachR. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
95.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 660–668. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660
96.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
