The purpose of the study was to investigate how university band students’ (non–music majors) motivational goal orientations toward band and academics differ across participants from Singapore (n = 200) and the United States (n = 227) and examine how they relate to a suite of adaptive dispositions (i.e., flow, grit, and commitment) relevant for 21st-century learning. Data were gathered via a self-report questionnaire that measured achievement goal orientations toward academic major, individual and collective goal orientations toward band, flow during rehearsals, grit while practicing, and commitment to band. An unexpected lack of cross-cultural differences was found, with participants from both cultural groups reporting higher levels of motivation toward their major academic field compared to band, indicating that achievement domain rather than culture accounted for differences in motivational goal orientations. Results also suggest that the optimal motivational profile to cultivate in large ensemble is a combination of individual mastery-approach and collective performance-approach goals.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
2.
AsmusE. P. (1994). Motivation in music teaching and learning. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 5(4), 5–32.
3.
AsmusE. P.HarrisonC. S. (1990). Characteristics of motivation for music and musical aptitude of undergraduate nonmusic majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 258–268. doi:10.2307/3345223
4.
BaranikL. E.StanleyL. J.BynumB. H.LanceC. E. (2010). Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 23, 265–282. doi:10.1080/08959285.2010.488463
5.
ChenC.LeeS.StevensonH. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Sciences, 6, 170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
6.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
7.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. London, England: Plenum.
8.
DekkerS.FischerR. (2008). Cultural differences in academic motivation goals: A meta-analysis across 13 societies. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 99–110. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.2.99-110
9.
DienerC. I.DweckC. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940–952. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.940
10.
DuckworthA. L.KirbyT. A.TsukayamaE.BersteinH.EricssonK. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success why grittier competitors triumph at the national spelling bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174–181. doi:10.1177/1948550610385872
11.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1087–1101. doi:10.1037/00223514.92.6.1087
12.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290
13.
DudaJ. L.NichollsJ. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 290–299. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290
14.
DweckC. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077149
15.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
17.
DweckC. S.ReppucciN. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109–116. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034248
18.
ElliotA. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement ( Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19.
ElliotA. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
ElliotA. J.ChirkovV. I.KimY.SheldonK. M. (2001). A crosscultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505–510.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
23.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.100.3.613
24.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
25.
HullemanC. S.DurikA. M.SchweigertS. A.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416.
26.
JacksonS. A.MartinA. J.EklundR. C. (2010). Short Dispositional Flow Scale. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
27.
KimU.TriandisH. C.KagitcibasiC.ChoiS.-C.YoonG. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
KingR. B. (2016). Is a performance-avoidance achievement goal always maladaptive? Not necessarily for collectivists. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 190–195.
29.
KingR. B.McInerneyD. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49(3), 175–198. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.926813
30.
KokC. L. (2014). Behavioural regulation, mental toughness, and achievement goals: a cross-cultural comparison between Singaporean and Finnish youth athletes (Doctoral dissertation). Available from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201405081643
31.
LacailleN.KoestnerR.GaudreauP. (2007). On the value of intrinsic rather than traditional achievement goals for performing artists: A short-term prospective study. International Journal of Music Education, 25, 245–255. doi:10.1177/025576140707083578
32.
LacailleN.WhippleN.KoestnerR. (2005). Reevaluating the benefits of performance goals: The relation of goal type McGregor to optimal performance for musicians and athletes. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 20, 11–16. Retrieved from https://www.sciandmed.com/mppa/journalviewer.aspx?issue=1160&article=1586
33.
LemkeC. (2011). Learning through technology. In BellancaJ. A.BrandtR. (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 243–272). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
34.
LiuW. C.WangC. K.TanO. S.EeJ.KohC. (2009). Understanding students’ motivation in project work: A 2 × 2 achievement goal approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 87–106. doi:10.1348/000709908X313767
35.
MaehrM. L.NichollsJ. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In WarrenN. (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 221–267). New York, NY: Academic Press.
36.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
37.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 6–17. doi:10.1177/002242940705500102
38.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2013). The role of the conductor’s goal orientation and use of shared performance cues on collegiate instrumentalists’ motivational beliefs and performance in large musical ensembles. Psychology of Music, 41(5), 630–646. doi:10.1177/0305735612441738
39.
McGregorH. A.ElliotA. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381–395. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.381
40.
MikszaP. (2009a). An investigation of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in the context of instrumental music. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Research perspectives: Thought and practice in music education (pp. 81–100). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
41.
MikszaP. (2009b). Relationships among impulsivity, achievement goal motivation, and the music practice of high school wind players. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 180, 9–27. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319317?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
42.
MikszaP. (2011). Relationships among achievement goal motivation, impulsivity, and the music practice of collegiate brass and woodwind players. Psychology of Music, 39, 50–67. doi:10.1177/0305735610361996
43.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 162–179. doi:10.1177/0022429415583474
44.
MikszaP.TanL.DyeC. (2016). Achievement motivation for band: A cross-cultural examination of the 2 × 2 achievement goal motivation framework. Psychology of Music, 44, 1372–1388. doi:10.1177/0305735616628659
45.
MoellerA. C.ElliotA. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In MitelA. V. (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307–326). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
46.
MurayamaK.ZhouM.NesbitJ. C. (2009). A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of responses to the achievement goal questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 266–286. doi:10.1177/0013164408322017
47.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
48.
NichollsJ. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
NielsenS. G. (2008). Achievement goals, learning strategies, and instrumental performance. Music Education Research, 10, 235–247. doi:10.1080/14613800802079106
PintrichP. R.GarciaT. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
52.
PoondejC.LerdpornkulratT. (2016). Examining the construct validity of the Thai version of the 2 × 2 achievement goal orientation scale in undergraduate students. Current Issues in Education, 19(1), 1–9.
53.
RawsthorneL. J.ElliotA. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 326–344. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_3
54.
ReimerB. (2003). A philosophy of music education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
SchmidtC. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, performance achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 134–147. doi:10.2307/3345514
56.
SmithB. P. (2005). Goal orientation, implicit theory of ability, and collegiate instrumental music practice. Psychology of Music, 33, 36–57. doi:10.1177/0305735605048013
SteckelC. L. (2001). An exploration of flow among collegiate marching band participants (Unpublished master’s thesis). Oklahoma State University, Norman.
59.
SunH.HernandezD. (2012). Testing structural invariance of the achievement goal questionnaire in American, Chinese, and Dutch college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(4), 257–269. doi:10.1177/0748175612449350
60.
SuttonR. C. (2004). Peak performance of groups: An examination of the phenomenon in musical groups (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 305035126)
61.
TanJ. P. L.NieY. (2015). The role of authentic tasks in promoting twenty-first century learning dispositions. In ChoY. H.CaleonI. S.KapurM. (Eds.), Authentic problem solving and learning in the 21st century (pp. 19–39). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-287-521-1_2
62.
TanL. (2012). Towards a transcultural philosophy of instrumental music education (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1287174918)
63.
TanL. (2016a). Confucius: Philosopher of twenty-first century skills. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, 1233–1243. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1182416
64.
TanL. (2016b). Towards an ancient Chinese-inspired theory of music education. Music Education Research, 18, 399–410. doi:10.1080/14613808.2015.1122751
65.
TanakaA.OkunoT.YamauchiH. (2002). Achievement motives, cognitive and social competence, and achievement goals in the classroom. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 445–458.
66.
TanakaA.YamauchiH. (2001). A model for achievement motives, goal orientations, intrinsic interest, and academic achievement. Psychological Reports, 88, 123–135.
67.
TaoV. Y. K.HongY.Y. (2014). When academic achievement is an obligation: Perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 110–136. doi:10.1177/0022022113490072
68.
TrillingB.FadelC. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69.
UrdanT. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu/96/2/251/
70.
Van YperenN. W.BlagaM.PostmesT. (2014). A meta-analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). PloS One, 9(4), e93594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093594
71.
WangC. K. J.BiddleS. J. H.ElliotA. J. (2007). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147–168. doi:10.1016/j.pscyhsport.2005.08.012
72.
WangC. K. J.LimB. S. C.AplinN.ChiaM. Y. H.McNeillM.TanW. K. C. (2008). Students’ attitudes and perceived purposes of physical education in Singapore: Perspectives from a 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. European Physical Education Review, 14(1), 51–70. doi:10.1177/1356336X07085709
73.
XiangP.LeeA.ShenJ. (2001). Conceptions of ability and achievement goals in physical education: Comparisons of American and Chinese students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 348–365. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1061
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
