The purpose of this study was to develop a Music Self-Concept Inventory (MSCI) for college students that is easy to administer and reflects the global nature of this construct. Students (N = 237) at a private college in the midwestern United States completed the initial survey, which contained 15 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Three subscales determined by previous research included (a) support or recognition from others, (b) personal interest or desire, and (c) self-perception of music ability. A series of exploratory factor analyses supported this model and indicated that deleting two items loading <.40 on their intended subscales improved validity and helped attain simple structure. The final version of the MSCI contains 13 items, explains 63.6% of the variance, and maintains high reliability (total: α = .94; subscales: α = .83–.92). Validity was demonstrated through correlation between the MSCI and another measure of music self-perception (r = .94), MSCI scores and years of participation in music activities (r = .64), and interfactor correlations (r = .71–.75). This instrument will provide a tool for researchers and educators to assess change or development in music self-concept and examine other variables related to this construct.
AsmusE. P. (1989). Factor analysis: A look at the technique through the data of Rainbow. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 101, 1–29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318371
2.
AustinJ. (1988). The effect of music contest format on self-concept, motivation, achievement, and attitude of elementary band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 95–107. doi:10.2307/3345243
3.
AustinJ. (1990). The relationship of music self-esteem to degree of participation in school and out-of-school music activities among upper elementary students. Contributions to Music Education, 36, 95–107. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127467
4.
AustinJ. (1991). Competitive and non-competitive goal structures: An analysis of motivation and achievement among elementary band students. Psychology of Music, 19, 142–158. doi:10.1177/0305735691192005
5.
AustinJ. R.VispoelW. P. (1998). How American adolescents interpret success and failure in classroom music: Relationships among attributional beliefs, self-concept and achievement. Psychology of Music, 26, 26–45. doi:10.1177/0305735698261004
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
7.
BarnetteJ. J. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 361–370. doi:10.1177/00131640021970592
8.
BrownJ. D. (2009). Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation Newsletter, 13(3), 20–25. Retrieved from http://jalt.org/test/bro_31.htm
9.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CarminesE. G.ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
ColosiR. (2005, August). Negatively worded questions cause respondent confusion. Proceedings of the survey research methods section, American Statistical Association (Session 197). Retrieved from https://www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/
12.
DemorestS. M.KelleyJ.PfordresherP. Q. (2017). Singing ability, musical self-concept, and future music participation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64, 405–420. doi:10.1177/0022429416680096
13.
DravesT. J. (2008). Music achievement, self-esteem, and aptitude in a college songwriting class. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 178, 29–44. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319337
14.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.HaroldR. D.BlumenfeldP. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x
15.
EvansE. M.SchweingruberH.StevensonH. W. (2002). Sex differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Gender Roles, 47, 153–167. doi:10.1023/A:1021047122532
GummA. (1990). A study of educational equity: The effect of selected minority status variables on music self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 2, 184–194.
21.
HeddenS. (1982). Prediction of music achievement in the elementary school. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 61–68. doi:10.2307/3344867
KlinedinstR. E. (1991). Predicting performance achievement and retention of fifth-grade instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 225–238. doi:10.2307/3344722
24.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
KruseN. B. (2012). Adult community musicians’ self-esteem of music ability. Research Studies in Music Education, 34, 61–72. doi:10.1177/1321103X12438655
26.
LewisJ. R.SauroJ. (2009). The factor structure of the system usability scale. In KurosuM. (Ed.), Human centered design, HCII 2009 (pp. 94–103). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
27.
MarshH. W. (1990). The causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646–656. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.646
28.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.MclnerneyD. M. (2003). International advances in self-research: Speaking to the future. In, MarshH. W.CravenR. G.MclnerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self-research (pp. 3–16). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
29.
MarshH. W.MartinA. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59–77. doi:10.1348/000709910X503501
30.
MarshH. W.ParkerP. D.CravenR. G. (2015). Dimensional comparison theory. In GuayF.MarshH.McInerneyD. M.CravenR. G. (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation, and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (pp. 115–150). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
31.
MarshH. W.ShavelsonR. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
32.
MatsunagaM. (2010). How to factor analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts and how to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. doi:10.21500/20112084.854
33.
MesmerH. A. E. (2008). Tools for matching readers to texts: Research-based practices. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
34.
MorinA. J. S.ScalasF. L.VispoelW. (2016). The music self-perception inventory: Development of parallel forms A and B. Psychology of Music. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0305735616669426
35.
MorinA. J. S.ScalasF. L.VispoelW.MarshH. W.WenZ. (2015). The music self-perception inventory: Development of a short form. Psychology of Music. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0305735615592690
36.
MuijsD. (2011). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37.
PajaresF.SchunkD. H. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs. In MarshH. W.CravenR.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), New frontiers for self-research (pp. 95–121). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
38.
RandlesC. (2010). The relationship of compositional experiences of high school instrumentalists to music self-concept. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 184, 7–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27861479
39.
Random.org. (1998–2016). [Online random sequence generator]. Retrieved from https://www.random.org/
40.
Readability-score.com. (2011–2016). [Online readability statistics calculator]. Retrieved from https://readability-score.com/
41.
ReynoldsJ. (1993). Music education and student self-concept: A review of literature. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 4(1), 20–27.
42.
RoszkowskiM. J.SovenM. (2010). Shifting gears: Consequences of including two negatively worded items in the middle of a positively worded questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 117–134. doi:10.1080/02602930802618344
43.
SandersP. D. (2000). Music self-concept, music aptitude, and music background of non-music majors. Contributions to Music Education, 27(2), 9–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127074
44.
SandersP. D.BrowneL. A. (1998). Music self-concept of non-music majors. Contributions to Music Education, 25(1), 74–86. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127068
45.
SauroJ.LewisJ. R. (2011, May). When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia.
46.
SchmidtC. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 134–147. doi:10.1177/002242940505300204
47.
SchmittM. (1979). Development and validation of a measure of self-esteem of music ability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 8009164)
48.
SchnareB.MacIntyreP.DoucetteJ. (2012). Possible selves as a source of motivation for musicians. Psychology of Music, 40, 94–111. doi:10.1177/0305735610391348
49.
SchriesheimC. A.HillK. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101–1114. doi:10.1177/001316448104100420
50.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. doi:10.3102/00346543046003407
51.
SichivitsaV. O. (2004). Music motivation: A study of fourth, fifth and sixth graders’ intentions to persist in music. Contributions to Music Education, 31(2), 27–41. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24126991
52.
SimpkinsS. D.VestA. E.BecnelJ. N. (2010). Participating in sport and music activities in adolescence: The role of activity participation and motivational beliefs during elementary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1368–1386. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9448-2
53.
SpychigerM.GruberL.OlbertzF. (2009). Musical self-concept: Presentation of a multi-dimensional model and its empirical analyses. In LouhivuoriJ.EerolaT.SaarikallioS.HimbergT.EerolaP.-S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 503–506). Jyväskylä, Finland: ESCOM. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-2009411322
54.
SuppleA. J.SuJ.PlunkettS. W.PetersonG. W.BushK. R. (2013). Factor structure of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 748–764. doi:10.1177/0022022112468942
55.
SvengalisJ. (1978). Music attitude and the preadolescent male (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 7902953)
56.
VanderArkS. D. (n.d.). [Untitled music self-concept scale]. Akron, OH: Author.
57.
VispoelW. P. (1993). The development and validation of the arts self-perception inventory for adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1023–1033. doi:10.1177/0013164493053004015
58.
VispoelW. P. (1994). Integrating self-perception of music skill into contemporary models of self-concept. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 5(4), 42–57.
59.
VispoelW. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134–153. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.134
60.
VispoelW. P. (1996). The development and validation of the arts self-perception inventory for adults. Educational Psychological Measurement, 56, 719–735. doi:10.1177/0013164496056004013
61.
VispoelW. P. (2003). Measuring and understanding self-perceptions of musical ability. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 151–180). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
62.
VispoelW. P.ForteE. E. (2000). Response bias and their relation to sex differences in multiple domains of self-concept. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 79–97. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1301_4
63.
WarnockE. C. (2009). Gender and attraction: Predicting middle school performance ensemble participation. Contributions to Music Education, 36(2), 59–78. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24127178
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
