The purpose of this mixed methods study was to investigate intragroup beliefs regarding participation in a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division II marching band throughout the university’s American football season. Fifty-three undergraduates from an urban midwestern university elected one of two options: (1) focus group only or (2) focus group and surveys. For the quantitative inquiry, it was hypothesized that members would report a downward concavity of group cohesion attributes and collective efficacy beliefs across time. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) found group integration–task (GI-T) and collective efficacy dipped at the midpoint of the season while beliefs regarding members’ attraction to the group, both task and social (ATG-T, ATG-S), and group integration–social (GI-S) remained consistently high. Focus groups data analysis revealed five broad themes: (1) connections, their pride in the band and its connectedness to their school and beyond; (2) family, how the band represents a family environment; (3) acceptance, belonging to the group; (4) music, the role of music in their lives; and (5) time, the temporal beliefs of the group throughout the season. These findings provide insight into the dynamic nature of group beliefs over time with musical ensembles.
AbrilC. R. (2012). Perspectives on the school band from hardcore American band kids. In CampbellP. S.WigginsT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of children’s musical cultures (pp. 434–448). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AdderleyC.KennedyM.BerzW. (2003). “A home away from home”: The world of the high school music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 190–205. doi:10.2307/3345373
3.
AllsupR. E.BenedictC. (2008). The problems of band: An inquiry into the future of instrumental music. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16, 156–173. doi:10.2979/PME.2008.16.2.156
4.
AsmusE. P. (1994). Motivation in music teaching and learning. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 5(4), 5–32.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
6.
BartoneP. T.AdlerA. B. (1999). Cohesion over time in a peacekeeping medical task force. Military Psychology, 11, 85–107. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_5
7.
CampbellP. S.ConnellC.BeegleA. (2007). Adolescents’ expressed meanings of music in and out of school. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 220–236. doi:10.1177/002242940705500304
8.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R.WidmeyerW. N. (2002). Group Environment Questionnaire: Test manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
9.
CarterB. A. (2013). “Nothing better or worse than being black, gay, and in the band”: A qualitative examination of gay undergraduates participating in historically black college or university marching bands. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 26–43. doi:10.1177/0022429412474470
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mix methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
DagazM. C. (2012). Learning from the band: Trust, acceptance, and self-confidence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41, 432–461. doi:10.1177/0891241612447813
14.
DuchanJ. S. (2012). Powerful voices: The musical and social world of collegiate a cappella. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
DunlopW. L.FalkC. F.BeauchampM. R. (2013). How dynamic are exercise group dynamics? Examining changes in cohesion within class-based exercise programs. Health Psychology, 32, 1240–1243. doi:10.1037/a0030412
16.
DrescherS.BurlingameG.FuhrimanA. (2012). Cohesion: An odyssey in empirical understanding. Small Group Research, 43, 662–689. doi:10.1177/1046496412468073
17.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters?Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10–43. doi:10.1177/0743558499141003
18.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L.StoneM.HuntJ. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 865–889. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00095.x
19.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 128–145. doi:10.1177/0022429411405207
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191 doi:10.3758/BF03193146
21.
FoleyD. E. (2001). The great American football ritual: Reproducing race, class, and gender inequality. In YiannakisA.MelnickM. (Eds.), The contemporary issues in sociology of sport (pp. 23–40). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
22.
FransenK.DecroosS.VanbeselaereN.Vande BroekG.De CuyperB.VanroyJ.BoenF. (2015). Is team confidence the key to success? The reciprocal relation between collective efficacy, team outcome confidence, and perceptions of team performance during soccer games. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 219–231. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.942689
23.
GardnerD. E.Light ShieldD. L.Light BredemeierB. L.BostrumA. (1996). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players. The Sport Psychologist, 10, 367–381.
24.
GeorgeT. R.FeltzD. L. (1995). Motivation in sport from a collective efficacy perspective. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26(1), 98–116.
25.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming a qualitative researcher: An introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
26.
GreerL. L. (2012). Group cohesion: Then and now. Small Group Research, 43, 655–661. doi:10.1177/1046496412461532
27.
GuX.SolmonM. A.ZhangT.XiangP. (2011). Group cohesion, achievement motivation, and motivational outcomes among female college students. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 175–188. doi:10.1080/10413200.2010.548847
HarrisonD. A.PriceK. H.BellM. P. (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107. doi:10.2307/256901
30.
HodgesL.CarronA. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48–59.
31.
HollanderJ. A. (2004). The social context of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33, 602–637. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
32.
JowettS.ShanmugamV.CaccoulisS. (2012). Collective efficacy as a mediator of the association between interpersonal relationships and athlete satisfaction in team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 66–78. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2012.645127
33.
KratusJ. (2007). Music education at the tipping point. Music Educators Journal, 94(2), 42–48, doi:10.1177/002743210709400209
34.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
LaineK. (2007). American band: Music, dreams, and coming of age in the heartland. New York, NY: Gotham Books
36.
LamontA. (2012). Emotion, engagement and meaning in strong experiences of music performance. Psychology of Music, 40, 574–594. doi:10.1177/0305735612448510
37.
LichaczF. M.PartingtonJ. T. (1996). Collective efficacy and true group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 146–158.
38.
MadsenC. K.PlackD. S.DunniganD. P. (2007). Marching band as a recruiting organization for the university. Journal of Band Research, 43, 54–62.
39.
MartinA. J.MansourM.AndersonM.GibsonR.LiemG. A. D.SudmalisD. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 709–727. doi:10.1037/a0032795
40.
MathieuJ. E.KukenbergerM. R.D’InnocenzoL. D.ReillyG. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 713–734. doi:10.1037/a0038898
41.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in musical ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 6–17. doi:10.1177/002242940705500102
42.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2013). The role of the conductor’s goal orientation and shared performance cues on collegiate instrumentalists’ motivational beliefs and performance in large musical ensembles. Psychology of Music, 41, 630–646. doi:10.1177/0305735612441738
43.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2016). Examining instrumental ensemble musicians’ group cohesion, motivational climate, and collective efficacy beliefs in the university and community band settings. Journal of Band Research, 51(2), 1–17.
44.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods source book (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
MorrisonS. J. (2001). The school ensemble: A culture of our own. Music Educators Journal, 88, 24–28. doi:10.2307/3399738
PescosolidoA. T. (2003). Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34, 20–42. doi:10.1177/1046496402239576
48.
Perez-PenaR. (2014, July14). Ohio State fires marching band director after finding tradition of sexual hazing. The New York Times.
49.
RichieJ.SpencerL. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for policy research. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London, England: Routledge.
50.
RothbartM.LewisT. L. (2006). Attitudes and beliefs in a marching band: Stereotyping and accentuating in a favorable intergroup context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 699–719. doi:10.1002/ejsp.312
51.
RoystonN. S. (2013). The relationship between collegiate band members’ preferences of teacher interpersonal behavior and perceived self-efficacy. Research and Issues in Music Education, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.stthomas.edu/rimeonline/vol11/royston.htm
52.
ShortS. E.SullivanP.FeltzD. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181–202. doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_3
53.
SilveiraJ. M.HudsonM. W. (2015). Hazing in the college marching band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 5–27. doi:10.1177/0022429415569064
54.
SilverW. S.BufanioK. M. (1996). The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance. Small Group Research, 27, 347–359. doi:10.1177/1046496496273001
55.
SpinkK. S. (1995). Cohesion and intention to participate of female sport team athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, 416–427. doi:10.1123/jsep.17.4.416
56.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
57.
TaggarS.SeijtsG. H. (2003). Leader and staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective efficacy and team performance. Human Performance, 16, 131–156. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1602_2
58.
TintoV. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599–623.
59.
TownsendB. G. (2004). College marching band members: Recruitment and retention. Journal of Band Research, 39, 65–76.
60.
Van RaalteJ. L.CorneliusA. E.LinderD. E.BrewerB. W. (2007). The relationship between hazing and team cohesion. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30, 491–507.
61.
VeraM.Le BlancP. M.TarisT. W.SalanovaM. (2014). Patterns of engagement: The relationship between efficacy beliefs and task engagement at the individual versus collective level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 133–144. doi:10.1111/jasp.12219
62.
WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R.CarronA. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. London, England: Sport Dynamics.
63.
WintersM. (2015, April24). Final three guilty in hazing death of Florida drum major. USA Today.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
