The purposes of the present study were to identify the teacher behaviors that preceded learners’ active participation in solving musical and technical problems and describe learners’ roles in the problem-solving process. I applied an original model of problem solving to describe the behaviors of teachers and students in 161 rehearsal frames extracted from 43 lessons with five artist-teachers. Results indicate that the number and type of learner problem-solving components varied according to the preceding teacher behavior. The teacher behaviors that most often preceded learner problem solving were varying the specificity of feedback and directives, asking questions, demonstrating contrasting options, stating principles, and refraining from answering learners’ questions.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612.
2.
BiddlecombeT. (2012). Assessing and enhancing feedback of choral conductors through analysis and training. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 4(1), 2–18.
3.
BroomheadP. (2009). An individualized problem solving approach for teaching choral phrase shaping: An experimental study. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 27(2), 52–61.
4.
BrunerJ. (1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CavittM. E. (2003). A descriptive analysis of error correction in instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 218–230.
6.
ChaffinR.ImrehG. (2001). A comparison of practice and self-report as sources of information about the goals of expert practice. Psychology of Music, 29, 39–69.
7.
ColpritE. J. (2000). Observation and analysis of Suzuki string teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 206–221.
8.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
10.
DolbeerR. C. (1969). Programed Instruction in detecting aural-notational errors in musical performance (Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
11.
DukeR. A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsing into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 78–95.
12.
DukeR. A. (1999). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 1–48.
13.
DukeR. A. (2012). Their own best teachers: How we help and hinder the development of learners’ independence. Music Educators Journal, 99(2), 36–41.
14.
DukeR. A.ChapmanD.-L. (2011). Changing learners: The nature of expertise in music teaching. In Ward-SteinmanP. M. (Ed.), Advances in Social-psychology and music education research (pp. 29–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19.
16.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321.
17.
DunckerK. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i–113.
18.
GrolnickW. S.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In GrusecJ. E.KuczynskiL. (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135–161). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
19.
HallamS. (2000). The development of performance planning strategies in musicians. In WoodsC. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Keele, England: European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music.
20.
HambrickD. Z.EngleR. W. (2003). The role of working memory in problem solving. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 176–206). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HewittM. P. (2011). The impact of self-evaluation instruction on student self-evaluation, music performance, and self-evaluation accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 6–20.
22.
Hill-BriggsF.LazoM.PeyrotM.DoswellA.ChangY.-T.HillM. N.. . . BrancatiF. L. (2011). Effect of problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training on diabetes control in a low income patient sample. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(9), 972–978.
23.
Hmelo-SilverC. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
24.
IsaksenS. G.DorvalK. B. (1993). Expanding views of CPS: A synergy methodology. In Creativity and innovation, the power of synergy. Darmstadt, Germany: European Conference on Creativity and Innovation.
25.
IsenA. M.ReeveJ. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 297–325.
26.
KoestnerR.RyanR. M.BernieriF.HoltK. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52, 233–248.
27.
LeeC. B.KohN. K.CaiX. L.QuekC. L. (2012). Children’s use of meta-cognition in solving everyday problems: Children’s monetary decision-making. Australian Journal of Education, 56(1), 22–39.
28.
LeeK.NgE. L.NgS. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 373–387.
29.
LinC.-Y.ChoS. (2011). Predicting creative problem-solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255–261.
30.
LoyensS. M. M.MagdaJ.RikersR. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 411–427.
31.
LüerG.SpadaH. (1998). Denken und Problemlösen [Thinking and problem solving]. In SpadaH. (Ed.), Lehrbuch Allgemeine Psychologie (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 189–280). Bern, Germany: Hans Huber.
32.
MaxfieldL. (2013). Improve your students’ learning by improving your feedback. Journal of Singing, 69(4), 471–478.
33.
McCartyM. E.CliftonR. K.CollardR. R. (1999). Problem solving in infancy: The emergence of an action plan. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1091–1101.
34.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5–35.
35.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (1999). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of musical practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 98–102.
36.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 254–266.
37.
NápolesJ.BowersJ. K. (2010). Differential effects of instructor feedback vs. self-observation analysis on music education majors’ increase of specific reinforcement in choral rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 183, 39–48.
38.
NielsenS. G. (2002). Musical practice in the conservatories: Strategies advanced students use in self-regulated learning. In HankenI. M.NielsenS. GraabraekNerlandM. (Eds.), Research in and for higher music education (pp. 69–84). Frogner: Norwegian Academy of Music.
39.
PriceH. E.YarbroughC. (1993). Effect of scripted sequential patterns of instruction in music rehearsals on teaching evaluations by college nonmusic students. The 14th ISME International Research Seminar, 119, 170–178.
RoeslerR. A. (2016). Toward solving the problem of problem solving an analysis framework. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(1), 28–42.
42.
RohwerD.PolkJ. (2006). Practice behaviors of eighth-grade instrumental musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 350–362.
43.
SikesP. L. (2013). The effects of specific practice strategy use on university string players’ performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 318–333.
44.
SongG.-W.HeW.-G.KongW. (2011). Influence of problem representation and working memory span on pupils’ mathematical problem solving. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 1283–1292.
45.
TsaiM.-J.HouH.-T.LaiM.-L.LiuW.-Y.YangF.-Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problems: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375–385.
46.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
WenkeD.FrenschP. A. (2003). Is success or failure at solving complex problems related to intellectual ability? In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Psychology of problem solving (pp. 87–126). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
WorthyM. D. (2003). Rehearsal frame analysis of an expert wind conductor in high school vs. college band rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 156, 11–19.
49.
WorthyM. D.ThompsonB. L. (2009). Observation and analysis of expert teaching in beginning band. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 180, 29–41.
50.
ZhengX.SwansonH. L.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Working memory components as predictors of children’s mathematical word problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 481–498.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
