The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of internal versus external focus of attention during novice teachers’ instructional preparation on their subsequent rehearsal behaviors. Thirty-two undergraduate instrumental music education students led bands in a series of three, 6-minute rehearsals on their assigned excerpt. Prior to these rehearsals, participants engaged in condition-specific score study and rehearsal preparation activities. Internal group (n = 16) participants’ preparation related to knowledge of the score, whereas external group (n = 16) participants focused their preparations on observable rehearsal behaviors with a minimal amount of time devoted to score study. We systematically analyzed video recordings of these rehearsals, calculating rates per minute of teacher verbalizations across several performance and teaching variables. We found that compared to the internal group, the external group exhibited higher rates of positive/specific feedback, conducted more frequent and briefer performance segments, and more often asked for the ensemble to start without providing a directive. The internal group mentioned ensemble balance in their rehearsals more frequently than did the external group, and their verbalizations reflected greater concern for Tone Quality. A panel of independent evaluators viewed all 96 video recordings of the rehearsals (presented to them without sound) and rated the clarity and the expression of participants’ conducting. We found a significant time by condition interaction for Expression, with scores for the external group increasing over time and scores for the internal group decreasing. We suggest that these results reflect the distinct and complementary benefits of each of these preparation methods for novice music teachers.
BaumertJ.KunterM.BlumW.BrunnerM.VossT.JordanA.. . . TsaiY.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
2.
BergeeM. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318730
3.
BerlinerD. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X015007007
4.
BorkoH.LivingstonC. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473
5.
BuellD. S. (1990). Effective rehearsing with the instrumental music ensemble: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51-04A, 1150.
6.
CashC. D.AllenS. E.SimmonsA. L.DukeR. A. (2014). Effects of model performances on music skill acquisition and overnight memory consolidation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022429413520409
7.
CroweD. R. (1996). Effects of score study style on beginning conductors’ error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 160–171. doi:10.2307/3345668
8.
DukeR. A.BlackmanM. D. (1991). The relationship between observers’ recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290–297. doi:10.2307/3345748
9.
DukeR. A.CashC. D.AllenS. E. (2011). Focus of attention affects performance of motor skills in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 44–55. doi:10.1177/0022429410396093
10.
DukeR. A.HenningerJ. C. (1998). Effects of verbal corrections on student attitude and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 482–495. doi:10.2307/3345345
11.
DukeR. A.HenningerJ. C. (2002). Teachers’ verbal corrections and observers’ perception of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 75–87. doi:10.2307/3345694
12.
DukeR. A.PrickettC. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27–37. doi:10.2307/3345166
13.
DukeR. A.PrickettC. A.JellisonJ. A. (1998). Empirical description of the pace of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 265–280. doi:10.2307/3345628
14.
EllisB. L. (1994). Selected band conductors’ preparation to conduct selected band compositions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-09A, 2626.
15.
FeldmanE.ContziusA.LutchM. (2011). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
GoolsbyT. W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 21–40. doi:10.2307/3345463
17.
GoolsbyT. W. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers’ preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 174–187. doi:10.2307/3345722
18.
HewittM. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/3345614
19.
HochkeppelW. J. (1993). Systematic score study: Effects of four methodologies on error detection achievement in instrumental conducting students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(08), 2937A.
20.
HopkinsJ. E. (1991). The effect of four approaches to score study on student conductors’ ability to detect errors in the performance of choral music. Illinois Digital Environment of Access to Learning and Scholarship. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20868
21.
JohnstonH. (1993). The use of video self-assessment, peer-assessment, and instructor feedback in evaluating conducting skills in music student teachers. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 57–63. doi:10.1017/S0265051700001431
22.
LaneJ. (2006). Undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ approach to score study in various musical contexts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 215–230. doi:10.1177/002242940605400305
23.
LethcoL. M. (1999). Preparing undergraduate music majors to teach beginning instrumentalists: The effects of self-evaluation, teacher observation, and performance-oriented instructional approaches on teacher behaviors and pupil responses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1058.
24.
MacLeodR. B.NápolesJ. (in press). The influences of teacher delivery and student progress on experienced teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Music Teacher Education. doi:10.1177/1057083714527111
25.
ManfredoJ. (2008). Factors influencing curricular content for undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 175, 45–62. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319412
26.
MarcumT.DukeR. A. (2015, March). The window of the mind: Analyses of visual gaze in skilled music teachers. Paper presented at the 21st International Symposium for Research in Music Behavior, Tallahassee, FL.
27.
MontemayorM. (2014). Evaluative and behavioral correlates to intrarehearsal achievement in high school bands. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 33–51. doi:10.1177/0022429413520010
28.
MontemayorM.MossE.A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 236–251. doi:10.1177/0022429409343183
29.
MorrisonS. J. (2002). The use of recorded models in the instrumental rehearsal: Effects on ensemble achievement. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 21–26. doi:10.1177/875512330202000206
30.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
31.
NápolesJ.MacLeodR. B. (2013). The influences of teacher delivery and student progress on preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 249–261. doi:10.1177/0022429413497234
32.
NathanM. J.PetrosinoA. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 905–928. doi:10.3102/00028312040004905
33.
PriceH. E.ByoJ. L. (2002). Rehearsing and conducting. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 335–351). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
RominesF. D. (2003). A survey of undergraduate instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Band Research, 38(2), 80–90.
35.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–31. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
36.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
37.
SilveyB. A. (2011). Effects of score study on novices’ conducting and rehearsing: A preliminary investigation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 187, 33–48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41162322
38.
SilveyB. A.MontemayorM. (2014). The effects of internal and external focus of attention on novices’ rehearsal evaluations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 161–174. doi:10.1177/0022429414530434
39.
StandleyJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1991). An observation procedure to differentiate teaching experience and expertise in music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 5–11. doi:10.2307/3344604
40.
TreviñoA. R. (2008). The effect of the use of an aural model during score study on undergraduate music majors’ conducting gesture (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
41.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
TukeyJ. W. (1980). We need both exploratory and confirmatory. American Statistician, 34, 23–25. doi:10.1080/00031305.1980.10482706
43.
Van OyenL. G.NiermanG. (1998). The effects of two approaches to instrumental score preparation on the error detection ability of student conductors. Contributions to Music Education, 25(1), 85–97.
44.
WilliamsonJ. E. (1998). Rehearsing the band. Cloudcroft, NM: Neidig Services.
45.
WorthyM. D. (2005). The effects of self-evaluation on the timing of teacher and student behaviors in lab rehearsals. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 15(1), 8–14. doi:10.1177/10570837050150010103
46.
WulfG. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 77–104. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
47.
YarbroughC. (1987). The relationship of behavioral self-assessment to the achievement of basic conducting skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 183–189. doi:10.2307/3344960
48.
YarbroughC.HenleyP. (1999). The effect of observation focus on evaluations of choral rehearsal excerpts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 308–318. doi:10.2307/3345486
49.
YarbroughC.MadsenK. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469–481. doi:10.2307/3345344
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
