Collaboration is essential in learning ensemble music. It is unclear, however, whether an individual benefits more from collaborative or individual rehearsal in the initial stages of such learning. In nonmusical domains, the effect of collaboration has been mixed, sometimes enhancing and sometimes inhibiting an individual’s learning process. In music, observational studies suggest collaborative rehearsal is indeed effective. In the present study, we compared collaborative and individual rehearsal directly and experimentally. Vocalists studied some pieces alone (with or without accompaniment) and some pieces collaboratively in groups of three. Their immediate performance and memory results indicated that accompaniment in solo sessions enhanced individual learning, and more importantly, collaboration had a detrimental effect. The findings are discussed within the general framework of blocking or free-riding theories.
AustinJ. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 866–878. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866
2.
BaileyB. (2005). Effects of group singing and performance for marginalized and middle-class singers. Psychology of Music, 33(3), 269–303. doi:10.1177/0305735605053734
3.
BasdenB. H.BasdenD. R.BrynerS.ThomasR. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1176–1189. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
DiehlM.StroebeW. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
8.
FordL.DavidsonJ. W. (2003). An investigation of members’ roles in wind quintets. Psychology of Music, 31(1), 53–74. doi:10.1177/0305735603031001323
9.
GinsborgJ.KingE. (2012). Rehearsal talk: Familiarity and expertise in singer-pianist duos. Musicae Scientiae, 16(2), 148–167. doi:10.1177/1029864911435733
10.
HeathC.GonzalezR. (1995). Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 305–326. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597885710242
11.
HinszV. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 705–718. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.4.705
12.
HollingsheadA. B. (1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 423–442. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
13.
JacksonM.MorelandR. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40(5), 508–534. doi:10.1177/1046496409340703
14.
LarsonJ. R.ChristensenC. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 5–30. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00983.x
15.
LataneB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/37/6/822/
16.
LiangD.MorelandR. L.ArgoteL. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Retrieved from http://psp.sagepub.com/content/21/4/384.short
17.
LimM. C. (2013). In pursuit of harmony: The social and organisational factors in a professional vocal ensemble. Psychology of Music. doi:10.1177/0305735612469674
MetcalfeJ.KornellN. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 530–542. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530
20.
MinsonJ. A.MuellerJ. S. (2012). The cost of collaboration: why joint decision making exacerbates rejection of outside information. Psychological Science, 23(3), 219–224. doi:10.1177/0956797611429132
21.
MurnighanJ.ConlonD. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165–186. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2393352
22.
NelsonT. O.NarensL. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
PeynirciogluZ. F.BrandlerB. J.HohmanT. J.KnutsonN. (2013). Metacognitive judgments in music performance. Psychology of Music, 42(5), 748–762. doi:10.1177/0305735613491999
24.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850
25.
SeddonF. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47–61. doi:10.1017/S0265051704005984
26.
SeddonF.BiasuttiM. (2009). Modes of communication between members of a string quartet. Small Group Research, 40(2), 115–137. doi:10.1177/1046496408329277
27.
SegalowitzN.CohenP. (2001). Musical recall memory: Contributions of elaboration and depth of processing. Psychology of Music. Retrieved from http://www.angelachan.ca/docs/musicalrecall.pdf
28.
StroebeW.DiehlM. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 271–303. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14792779543000084
29.
TindaleR. S.SheffeyS. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5(1), 5–18. doi:10.1177/1368430202005001535
30.
WegnerD. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In MullenB.GoethalsG. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
WegnerD.ErberR.RaymondP. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1774630
32.
WeldonM. S.BellingerK. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1160–1175. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9293627
33.
YoungV. M.Colmana. M. (1979). Some psychological processes in string quartets. Psychology of Music, 7(1), 12–18. doi:10.1177/030573567971002
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
