The purpose of this study was to examine collaborative composing in high school string chamber music ensembles. Research questions included the following: (a) How do high school string instrumentalists in chamber music ensembles use verbal and musical forms of communication to collaboratively compose a piece of music? (b) How do selected variables (music performance and composing experience, quality of group collaboration, gender grouping, perceptions of the project) influence the process of composing collaboratively in a high school chamber music ensemble? and (c) What variables influence the quality of the resulting collaborative composition? High school string instrumentalists (N = 37) formed eight chamber music ensembles. Participants completed a presurvey regarding music performance and composing experiences, were videotaped while composing chamber music compositions, and completed a postsurvey regarding their project experiences. All groups spent a larger percentage of time engaged in task-directed musical communication than in verbal communication. Balance of collaboration had a strong relationship with composition quality. Mixed-gender groups had a stronger balance of collaboration than same-gender groups. Postsurvey data indicated that enjoyment of the project was found to have a strong relationship with composition quality.
AllsupR. E. (2003). Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 24–37. doi:10.2307/3345646
2.
BalesR. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
3.
BarlettJ. E.KotrlikJ. W.HigginsC. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43–50.
4.
BergM. H. (1997). Social construction of musical experience in two high school chamber music ensembles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
5.
BiasuttiM. (2012). Group music composing strategies: A case study within a rock band. British Journal of Music Education, 29, 343–357. doi:10.1017/S0265051712000289
6.
BruffeeK. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
BurlandK.DavidsonJ. W. (2001). Investigating social processes in group musical composition. Research Studies in Music Education, 16, 46–56. doi:10.1177/1321103x010160010901
8.
BurnardP.YounkerB. A. (2008). Investigating children’s musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engestrom’s activity theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.001
9.
CampbellP. S. (1995). Of garage bands and song-getting: The musical development of young rock musicians. Research Studies in Music Education, 4, 12–20. doi:10.1177/1321103x9500400103
10.
ChinnC. (2010). Collaborative and cooperative learning. In Clauss-EhlersC. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cross-cultural school psychology (pp. 229–232). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71799-976
11.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). The National Standards for Arts Education. Reston, VA: MENC.
12.
DukeR. A.StammenD. (2011). Scribe 4 (for observation and assessment). Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.
13.
Editorial: Parkinson’s law [Editorial]. (1955, November19). Economist, p. 635.
14.
FautleyM. (2004). Teacher intervention strategies in the composing processes of lower secondary school students. International Journal of Music Education, 22, 201–218. doi:10.1177/0255761404047402
15.
FautleyM. (2005): A new model of the group composing process of lower secondary school students. Music Education Research, 7, 39–57. doi:10.1080/14613800500042109
16.
HämäläinenR.VähäsantanenK. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6, 169–184. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001
17.
HargreavesD. J.GaltonM. J.RobinsonS. (1996). Teachers’ assessments of primary children’s classwork in the creative arts. Educational Research, 38, 199–211.
18.
HewittA. (2008). Children’s creative collaboration during a computer-based music task. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 11–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.003
19.
HopkinsM. (2013). Factors contributing to orchestra teachers’ inclusion of composing activities in their curricula. String Research Journal, 4, 15–36.
20.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In TindaleR. S.HeathL.EdwardsJ.PosavacE. J.BryantF. B.Suarez-BalcazarY.Henderson-KingE.MyersJ. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 9–36). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
21.
KaschubM. (1999). Sixth-grade students’ descriptions of their individual and collaborative music composition processes and products initiated from prompted and unprompted task structures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
22.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (2009). Minds on music: Composition for creative and critical thinking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
23.
LehmanP. (2008). A vision for the future: Looking at the standards. Music Educators Journal, 94(4), 28–32. doi:10.1177/00274321080940040103
24.
LuceD. W. (2001). Collaborative learning in music education: A review of the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 19(2), 20–25. doi:10.1177/87551233010190020105
25.
MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.MitchellL. (2002). An investigation of children’s musical collaborations: The effect of friendship and age. Psychology of Music, 30, 148–163. doi:10.1177/0305735602302002
26.
MacDonaldR. A. R.MiellD.MorganL. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 15, 405–415.
27.
MatthewsR. S.CooperJ. L.DavidsonN. (1995). Building bridges between cooperative and collaborative learning. Change, 27(4), 34–40.
28.
MiellD.LittletonK. (2008). Musical collaboration outside school: Processes of negotiation in band rehearsals. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.006
29.
MiellD.MacDonaldR A. R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9, 348–369.
30.
MorganL.HargreavesD.JoinerR. (2000). Children’s collaborative music composition: communication through music. In JoinerR.LittletonK.FaulknerD.MiellD. (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 52–64). London, UK: Free Association Books.
31.
MorganL.HargreavesD. J.JoinerR. W. (1997). How do children make music? Composition in small groups. Early Childhood Connections, 5, 15–21.
32.
PhelpsK. B. (2008). The status of instruction in composition in elementary general music classrooms of MENC members in the state of Maryland (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.
33.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34, 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850
34.
SchoppS. E. (2006). A study of the effects of national standards for music education, number 3, improvisation and number 4, composition on high school band instruction in New York state (Doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
35.
SeddonF. A. (2006). Collaborative computer-mediated music composition in cyberspace. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 273–283. doi:10.1017/S0265051706007054
36.
SeddonF. A.O’NeillS. A. (2006). How does formal instrumental music tuition (FIMT) impact on self- and teacher-evaluations of adolescents’ computer-based compositions?Psychology of Music, 34, 27–45. doi:10.1177/0305735606059103
37.
St. JohnP. A. (2006). Finding and making meaning: Young children as musical collaborators. Psychology of Music, 34, 238–261. doi:10.1177/0305735606061854
38.
StrandK. (2006). Survey of Indiana music teachers on using composition in the classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 154–167. doi:10.1177/002242940605400206
39.
SummersJ. J.BeretvasS. N.SvinickiM. D.GorinJ. S. (2005). Evaluating collaborative learning and community. Journal of Experimental Education, 7, 165–188. doi:10.2307/20157395
40.
VelosoA. L.CarvalhoS. (2012). Music composition as a way of learning: Emotions and the situated self. In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity: Insights from music education research (pp. 73–91). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
41.
WebsterP. R. (2012). Toward pedagogies of revision: Guiding a student’s musical composition. In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity: Insights from music education research (pp. 93–112). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
42.
WigginsJ. H. (2000). The nature of shared musical understanding and its role in empowering independent musical thinking. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 65–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
