Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate nationwide enrollment in high school music courses from 1982 until 2009 to determine what trends in music enrollment existed and whether these trends were affected by the passage and implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). With data from 10 separate nationally representative high school transcript studies conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics, a unique data set was constructed that tracked the transcript-indicated 9th- through 12th-grade music course enrollment patterns for the U.S. graduating classes of 1982, 1987, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2005, and 2009. Descriptive results showed that overall music enrollment patterns were relatively stable in the public schools, with roughly 34% of all students consistently enrolling in at least one music course during high school across all cohorts. Abbreviated interrupted time series analyses suggest that NCLB had no effect on overall music enrollment rates but exacerbated the preexisting underrepresentation in music courses of Hispanic students, English language learners, and students with Individualized Education Plans.

Keywords

No Child Left Behind education policy music enrollment demographics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abril

C. R.

Gault

B. M.

(2006). The state of music in the elementary school: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 6–20. doi:10.1177/002242940605400102

Abril

C. R.

Gault

B. M.

(2008). The state of music in secondary schools: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 68–81. doi:10.1177/0022429408317516

Alt

M. N.

Bradby

(1999). Procedures guide for transcript studies (Working Paper No. 1999-05). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

(2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523

Beveridge

(2009). No Child Left Behind and fine arts classes. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), 4–7. doi:10.1080/10632910903228090

Chapman

L. H.

(2004). No Child Left Behind in art? Arts Education Policy Review, 106(2), 3–20. doi:10.3200/AEPR.106.2.3-20

Chapman

L. H.

(2007). An update on No Child Left Behind and national trends in education. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(1), 25–40. doi:10.3200/AEPR.109.1.25-40

Colwell

(2005). Whither programs and arts policy? Arts Education Policy Review, 106(6), 19–29. doi:10.3200/AEPR.106.6.19-30

Cook

T. D.

Wong

V. C.

(2008). Better quasi-experimental practice. In Alasuutari

Bickman

Brannen

(Eds.), Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 134–165). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

10.

Dee

T. S.

Jacob

B. A.

(2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418–446. doi:10.1002/pam.20586

11.

Dillon

(2006, March 26). Schools cut back subjects to push reading and math. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

12.

Elpus

(2013). Music in U.S. federal education policy: Estimating the effect of “core status” for music. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(1), 13–24. doi:10.1080/10632913.2013.744242

13.

Elpus

Abril

C. R.

(2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 128–145. doi:10.1177/0022429411405207

14.

Figlio

D. N.

(2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 837–851. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.01.003

15.

Figlio

D. N.

Winicki

(2005). Food for thought: the effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 381–394. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.007

16.

Gerrity

K. W.

(2009). No Child Left Behind: Determining the impact of policy on music education in Ohio. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 179, 79–93.

17.

Heilig

J. V.

Cole

Aguilar

(2010). From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The evolution and devolution of public arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(4), 136–145. doi:10.1080/10632913.2010.490776

18.

(2012, February 9). 10 states are given waivers from education law. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

19.

Jacob

B. A.

(2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761–796. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004

20.

Jacob

B. A.

Levitt

S. D.

(2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 843–877. doi:10.1162/00335530360698441

21.

Lauen

D. L.

Gaddis

S. M.

(2012). Shining a light or fumbling in the dark? The effects of NCLB’s subgroup-specific accountability on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. doi:10.3102/0162373711429989

22.

Lee

(2006). Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in-depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.

23.

Lee

Reeves

(2012). Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources: State NAEP 1990–2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 209–231. doi:10.3102/0162373711431604

24.

McMurrer

(2007). Choices and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

25.

Peterson

P. E.

West

M. R.

(2003). No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

26.

Rao

J. N. K.

Scott

A. J.

(1984). On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Annals of Statistics, 12(1), 46–60. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346391

27.

Ravitch

(2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education (Rev. and expanded ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

28.

Rich

(2012, July 6). “No Child” law whittled down by White House. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

29.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

30.

Spohn

(2008). Teacher perspectives on No Child Left Behind and arts education: A case study. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 3–12. doi:10.3200/AEPR.109.4.3-12

31.

Stewart

(1991). Who takes music? Investigating access to high school music as a function of school and social factors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9208660)

32.

Stiefel

Schwartz

A. E.

Chellman

C. C.

(2007). So many children left behind: Segregation and the impact of subgroup reporting in No Child Left Behind on the racial test score gap. Educational Policy, 21, 527–550. doi:10.1177/0895904806289207

33.

West

(2012). Teaching music in an era of high-stakes testing and budget reductions. Arts Education Policy Review, 113, 75–79. doi:10.1080/10632913.2012.656503

34.

Wong

(2008). Studies of educational change from three disciplinary perspectives: Sociology, policy, and human development (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 304543742)

35.

Wong

Cook

T. D.

Steiner

P. M.

(2009a, March). Comparison groups in short interrupted time series: An illustration evaluating No Child Left Behind. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Educational Effectiveness Annual Conference, Crystal City, VA. Available from ERIC. (ED514988)

36.

Wong

Cook

T. D.

Steiner

P. M.

(2009b). No Child Left Behind: An interim evaluation of its effects on learning using two interrupted time series each with its own non-equivalent comparison series. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/papers/2009/ipr-wp-09-11.html

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.63 MB

Evaluating the Effect of No Child Left Behind on U.S. Music Course Enrollments

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material