This study was designed to investigate the extent to which the presentation of an auditory model prior to learning a novel melody affects performance during active practice and the overnight consolidation of procedural memory. During evening training sessions, 32 nonpianist musicians practiced a 13-note keyboard melody with their left (nondominant) hand in twelve 30-s practice intervals separated by 30-s rest intervals. Participants were instructed to play the sequence “as quickly, accurately, and evenly as possible.” Approximately half the participants, prior to the first practice interval, listened to 10 repetitions of the target melody played at 552 tones per minute (half note = 138). All participants were tested on the target melody the following morning, approximately 12 hr after training, in three 30-s blocks separated by 30-s rest intervals. Performance was measured in terms of the mean number of correct key presses per 30-s block (CKP/B). Consistent with previous research, participants made considerable improvements in CKP/B during the evening training sessions and between the end of training and the morning test sessions. Learners who listened to the model made significantly larger gains in performance during training and between the end of training and test than did those who did not hear the model.
AllenS. E. (2012). Memory stabilization and enhancement following music practice. Psychology of Music, 41, 779–793.
2.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34, 535–558. doi:10.1177/0305735606067170
3.
BarryN. H.McArthurV. (1994). Teaching practice strategies in the music studio: A survey of applied music teachers. Psychology of Music, 22, 44–55. doi:10.1177/0305735694221004
4.
BartolomeS. J. (2009). Naturally emerging self-regulated practice behaviors among highly successful beginning recorder students. Research Studies in Music Education, 31(1), 37–51. doi:10.1177/1321103x09103629
5.
BertenthalB. I.LongoM. R.KosobudA. (2006). Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 210–225. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.210
6.
BlandinY.LhuissetL.ProteauL. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957–979. doi:10.1080/027249899390882
7.
Brashers-KrugT.ShadmehrR.BizziE. (1996). Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature, 382(6588), 252–255. doi:10.1038/382252a0
8.
BuccinoG.RiggioL. (2006). The role of the mirror neuron system in motor learning. Kinesiology, 38, 5–15.
9.
CashC. D. (2009). Effects of early and late rest intervals on performance and overnight consolidation of a keyboard sequence. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 252-266. doi:10.1177/0022429409343470
10.
ChaffinR.ImrehG. (2001). A comparison of practice and self-report as sources of information about the goals of expert practice. Psychology of Music, 29, 39–69. doi:10.1177/0305735601291004
11.
CharnessN.TuffiashM.KrampeR.ReingoldE.VasyukovaE. (2005). The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 151–165. doi:10.1002/acp.1106
12.
CherbuinN.BrinkmanC. (2005). Practice makes two hemispheres almost perfect. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 413–422. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.010
13.
ClassenJ.CohenL. G. (2003). Practice-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex. In BonifaceS.ZiemannU. (Eds.), Plasticity in the human nervous system: Investigation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (pp. 90–106). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ClassenJ.LiepertJ.WiseS.HallettM.CohenL. G. (1998). Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1117–1123.
15.
CoffmanD. D. (1990). Effects of mental practice, physical practice, and knowledge of results on piano performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 187–196. doi:10.2307/3345182
16.
CouzijnM. (1999). Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 9, 109–142. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00040-1
17.
DukeR. A.AllenS. E.CashC. D.SimmonsA. L. (2009). Effects of early and late rest breaks during training on overnight memory consolidation of a keyboard melody. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 169–172. doi:NYAS04795 [pii] 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04795.x
18.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much, it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and the retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
19.
FrewenK. G. (2010). Effects of familiarity with a melody prior to instruction on children’s piano performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 320–333. doi:10.1177/0022429409351178
20.
HallamS. (1997). Approaches to instrumental music practice of experts and novices. In JorgensenH.LehmannA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice. Oslo, Norway: Norges Musisikkhøgskole.
21.
HewittM. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/3345614
22.
HoddesE.ZarconeV.SmytheH.PhilipsR.DementW. C. (1973). Quantification of sleepiness: A new approach. Psychophysiology, 10, 431–436. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x
23.
KormanM.RazN.FlashT.KarniA. (2003). Multiple shifts in the representation of a motor sequence during the acquisition of skilled performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 12492–12497. doi:10.1073/pnas.2035019100
24.
KrampeR. T.EricssonK. (1996). Maintaining excellence: Deliberate practice and elite performance in young and older pianists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 331–359. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
25.
LahavA.BoulangerA.SchlaugG.SaltzmanE. (2005). The power of listening: Auditory-Motor interactions in musical training. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 189–194. doi:10.1196/annals.1360.042
26.
LahavA.SaltzmanE.SchlaugG. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308–314. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-06.2007
27.
LaiQ.SheaC. H.BruechertL.LittleM. (2002). Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 299–307. doi:10.1080/00222890209601948
28.
MaslovatD.HodgesN. J.KrigolsonO. E.HandyT. C. (2010). Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 119–130. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2302-7
29.
MaynardL. (2006). The role of repetition in the practice sessions of artist-teachers and their students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 167, 61–72.
30.
MontemayorM.MossE. A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 236–251. doi:10.1177/0022429409343183
31.
MorrisonS. J. (2002). The use of recorded models in the instrumental rehearsal. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20, 21 –26. doi:10.1177/875512330202000206
32.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
33.
RohbanfardH.ProteauL. (2011a). Effects of the model’s handedness and observer’s viewpoint on observational learning. Experimental Brain Research, 214, 567–576. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2856-z
34.
RohbanfardH.ProteauL. (2011b). Learning through observation: A combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Experimental Brain Research, 215, 183–197. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2882-x
35.
RosenthalR. K. (1984). The relative effects of guided model, model only, guide only, and practice only treatments on the accuracy of advanced instrumentalists’ musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 265–273. doi:10.2307/3344924
36.
RosenthalR. K.WilsonM.EvansM.GreenwaltL. (1988). Effects of different practice conditions on advanced instrumentalists’ performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 250–257. doi:10.2307/3344877
37.
SheaC. H.WulfG.ParkJ.-H.GauntB. (2001). Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127–138. doi:10.1080/00222890109603145
38.
SimmonsA. L.DukeR. A. (2006). Effects of sleep on performance of a keyboard melody. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 257–269. doi:10.1177/002242940605400308
39.
SimmonsA. L. (2012). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 357-368. doi:10.1177/0022429411424798
40.
TheilerA. M.LippmanL. G. (1995). Effects of mental practice and modeling on guitar and vocal performance. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 329–343. doi:10.1080/00221309.1995.9921245
41.
WalkerM. P. (2005). A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 51–104. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000026
42.
WalkerM. P.BrakefieldT.HobsonJ. A.StickgoldR. (2003). Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature, 425(6958), 616–620. doi:10.1038/nature01930
43.
WulfG.SheaC.LewthwaiteR. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75–84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
