The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of specific practice strategy use on university string players’ performance. Participants (N = 40) volunteered for the study and were string players enrolled in orchestra at a major research university. Within a pretest–posttest designed study, participants were assigned to one of four treatment groups using stratified randomization: free practice, playing slowly then gradually speeding up, repeating small sections, and playing the excerpt multiple times. In a recorded session, participants were given 1 min to review the study music and then were asked to sight-read the excerpt. Participants then practiced using their assigned strategy for 10 min, rested for 1 min, and performed the excerpt again. The researcher discovered that each practice strategy significantly improved university string players’ performance. No differences were found among practice strategies with regard to pitch, rhythm, expression, or overall scores. Results of an additional analysis indicated that the results may have been affected by performance level of the participants, the study music, and the time involved in the practice session.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34, 535–558. doi:10.1177/0305735606067170
2.
BarryN. H. (2007). A qualitative study of applied music lessons and subsequent student practice sessions. Contributions to Music Education, 34, 51–65. doi:10.1177/8755123310361768
ChaffinR.ImrehG. (2001). A comparison of practice and self-report as sources of information about the goals of expert practice. Psychology of Music, 29, 39–69. doi:10.1177/0305735601291004
7.
ChaffinR.LisboaT.LoganT.BegoshK. T. (2010). Preparing for memorized cello performance: The role of performance cues. Psychology of Music, 38, 3–30. doi:10.1177/0305735608100377
8.
CoffmanD. D. (1990). Effects of mental practice, physical practice, and knowledge of results on piano performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 187–196. doi:10.2307/3345182
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
11.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
12.
FarnumS. E. (1969). Farnum string scale: A performance scale for all string instruments. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
13.
GalamianI. (1964). Principles of violin playing and teaching. London, England: Faber & Faber.
HallamS. (1997a). Approaches to instrumental music practice of experts and novices: Implications for education. In JørgensenH.LehmanA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 179–231). Oslo, Norway: Norges musikkhøgskole.
16.
HallamS. (1997b). What do we know about practicing? Towards a model synthesizing the research literature. In JørgensenH.LehmanA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 179–231). Oslo, Norway: Norges musikkhøgskole.
17.
HallamS. (1998). The predictors of achievement and dropout in instrumental tuition. Psychology of Music, 26, 116–132. doi:10.1177/0305735698262002
18.
HallamS. (2001). The development of expertise in young musicians: Strategy use, knowledge acquisition and individual diversity. Music Education Research, 3, 7–23. doi:10.1080/14613800020029914
19.
HenleyP. T. (2001). Effects of modeling and tempo patterns as practice techniques on the performance of high school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 169–180. doi:10.2307/3345868
20.
HewittM. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/3345614
21.
HewittM. P. (2002). Self-evaluation tendencies of junior high instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 215–226. doi:10.2307/3345799
JørgensenH. (2004). Strategies for individual practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 85–103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
KostkaM. J. (2000). The effects of error-detection practice on keyboard sight-reading achievement of undergraduate music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 114–122. doi:10.2307/3345570
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10, 91–106. doi:10.1080/14613800701871439
27.
LisboaT. (2008). Action and thought in cello playing: An investigation of children’s practice and performance. International Journal of Music Education, 26, 243–267. doi:10.1177/0255761408092526
28.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5–35. doi:10.1177/0305735605048012
29.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186. doi:10.1080/14613800120089232
30.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375. doi:10.1177/0022429408317513
NielsenS. (1999b). Regulation of learning strategies during practice: A case study of a single church organ student preparing a particular work for a concert performance. Psychology of Music, 27, 218–229. doi:10.1177/0305735699272015
33.
NielsenS. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431. doi:10.1177/0305735604046099
34.
PittsS.DavidsonJ.McPhersonG. E. (2000). Developing effective practice strategies: Case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2, 45–56. doi:10.1080/14613800050004422
35.
RohwerD.PolkJ. (2006). Practice behaviors of eighth-grade instrumental musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 350–362. doi:10.1177/002242940605400407
36.
RosenthalR. K.WilsonM.EvansM.GreenwaltL. (1988). Effects of different practice conditions on advanced instrumentalists’ performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 250–257. doi:10.2307/3344877
37.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x
38.
StiversJ. D. (1972). A reliability and validity study of the Watkins-Farnum Performance Scale. Dissertation Abstracts International–A, 34, 815. (ProQuest ID 759656991)
39.
WilliamonA.ValentineE. (2000). Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 353–376. doi:10.1348/000712600161871
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
