This study examined the college entrance examination scores of music and non-music students in the United States, drawing data from the restricted-use data set of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS), a nationally representative education study (N = 15,630) conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. Analyses of high school transcript data from ELS showed that 1.127 million students (36.38% of the U.S. class of 2004) graduated high school having earned at least one course credit in music. Fixed-effects regression procedures were used to compare standardized test scores of these music students to their non-music peers while controlling for variables from the domains of demography, prior academic achievement, time use, and attitudes toward school. Results indicated that music students did not outperform non-music students on the SAT once these systematic differences had been statistically controlled. The obtained pattern of results remained consistent and robust through internal replications with another standardized math test and when disaggregating music students by type of music studied.
AbellaR.UrrutiaJ.ShneydermanA. (2005). An examination of the validity of English-language achievement test scores in an English language learner population. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(1), 127–144. doi:10.1080/15235882.2005.10162827
BaboG. D. (2004). The relationship between instrumental music participation and standardized assessment achievement of middle school students. Research Studies in Music Education, 22(1), 14–27. doi:10.1177/1321103x040220010301
5.
BakerR. A.(2011). The effects of high-stakes testing policy on arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 113(1), 17–25. doi: 10.1080/10632913.2012.626384
6.
ButzlaffR. (2000). Can music be used to teach reading?Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 167–178.
7.
CardD.RothsteinJ. (2007). Racial segregation and the Black–White test score gap. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11/12), 2158–2184. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.006
8.
CatterallJ. S. (1997). Involvement in the arts and success in secondary school. Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/JLuvd
9.
CatterallJ. S. (2009). Doing well and doing good by doing art: A 12-year national study of education in the visual and performing arts. Los Angeles, CA: I-Group Books.
10.
CatterallJ. S.ChapleauR.IwanagaJ. (1999). Involvement in the arts and human development: General involvement and intensive involvement in music and theater arts. In FiskeE. B. (Ed.), Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
11.
CheekJ. M.SmithL. R. (1999). Music training and mathematics achievement. Adolescence, 34(136), 759–761.
12.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Costa-GiomiE. (1999). The effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s cognitive development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(3), 198–212. doi:10.2307/3345779
15.
Costa-GiomiE. (2004). Effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s academic achievement, school performance and self-esteem. Psychology of Music, 32(2), 139–152. doi:10.1177/0305735604041491
16.
EisnerE. W. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement?Art Education, 51(1), 7–15.
17.
EisnerE. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
ElpusK. (2011). Justifying music education: Econometric analyses of issues in music education policy (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3456550)
19.
ElpusK.AbrilC. R. (2011). High school music ensemble students in the United States: A demographic profile. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 128–145. doi:10.1177/0022429411405207
20.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2006). The effect of instrumental music participation and socioeconomic status on Ohio fourth-, sixth-, and ninth-grade proficiency test performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 73–84. doi: 10.1177/002242940605400106
21.
FreedleR. O. (2003). Correcting the SAT’s ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 1–43.
22.
GouzouasisP.GuhnM.KishorN. (2007). The predictive relationship between achievement and participation in music and achievement in core grade 12 academic subjects. Music Education Research, 9(1), 81–92.
23.
HedgesL.NowellA. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45. doi:10.1126/science.7604277
24.
HelmrichB. H. (2010). Window of opportunity?: Adolescence, music and alegebra. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(4), 557–577. doi:10.1177/0743558410366594
25.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.WilsonD.BurnsL. J.CurrivanD.RogersJ. E.Hubbard-BednaszS. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year to second follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2008-347). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
26.
JohnsonC. M.MemmottJ. E. (2006). Examination of relationships between participation in school music programs of differing quality and standardized test results. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(4), 293–307. doi:10.1177/002242940605400403
27.
KinneyD. W. (2008). Selected demographic variables, school music participation, and achievement test scores of urban middle school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(2), 145–161. doi:10.1177/0022429408322530
28.
KinneyD. W. (2010). Selected nonmusical predictors of urban students decisions to enroll and persist in middle school band programs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(4), 334–350. doi: 10.1177/0022429409350086
29.
LewinT. (2005, March4). Strivers sharpen no. 2’s for different college test. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
30.
MikszaP. (2007). Music participation and socioeconomic status as correlates of change: A longitudinal analysis of academic achievement. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 172, 41–58.
31.
MikszaP. (2010). Investigating relationships between participation in high school music ensembles and extra-musical outcomes: An analysis of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 using a bioecological development model. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 186, 7–25.
32.
MorrisonS. J. (1994). Music students and academic growth. Music Educators Journal, 81(2), 33–36. doi:10.2307/3398812
33.
National Association for Music Education. (2011a). NAfME advocacy groundswell. Retrieved from http://advocacy.nafme.org
ReimerB. (1999). Facing the risks of the “Mozart effect.”Music Educators Journal, 86(1), 37–43. doi:10.2307/3399576
37.
ReimerB. (2005). The danger of music education advocacy. International Journal of Music Education, 23(2), 139–142.
38.
RogersW. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.
39.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
SouthgateD. E.RoscignoV. J. (2009). The impact of music on childhood and adolescent achievement. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), 4–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00598.x
41.
SteinerP. M.CookT. D.ShadishW. R.ClarkM. H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 250–267. doi:10.1037/a0018719
42.
StewartC. (1991). Who takes music? Investigating access to high school music as a function of social and school factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
43.
VaughanK. (2000). Music and mathematics: Modest support for the oft-claimed relationship. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 149–166.
44.
VaughanK.WinnerE. (2000). SAT scores of students who study the arts: What we can and cannot conclude about the association. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 77–90.
45.
WinnerE.CooperM. (2000). Mute those claims: No evidence (yet) for a causal link between arts study and academic achievement. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 11–75.
46.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
ZwickR.Greif GreenJ. (2007). New perspectives on the correlation of SAT scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 23–45. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00025.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
