We investigated the effect of legato and staccato articulation styles on the perception of modulated tempos. Ninety music majors served as participants. Listeners heard music examples that had been selected from two pieces, each of which included staccato and legato passages. Excerpts were presented to listeners in three conditions of tempo modulation: gradual increases, gradual decreases, or no change. Modulations were produced in small increments so that listeners would not notice any abrupt change in tempo. Results indicated that articulation style and direction of modulation affected listener perception of tempo, and these two factors interacted significantly. All staccato stimuli were judged as increasing in tempo more than legato stimuli; however, differences between the two articulation styles were perceived as larger in tempo-increase examples compared to the no-change and tempo-decrease examples. Implications for performance practice and teaching are discussed.
Brittin, R.V. (1992). Perceptions of conducting: Accuracy in detecting modulated beat. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 1-8.
3.
Brittin, R.V. (2000). Children's preference for sequenced accompaniments: The influence of style and perceived tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 237-248.
4.
Drake, A.H. (1968). An experimental study of selected variables in the performance of musical durational notation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 16, 329-338.
5.
Duke, R.A. (1989). Effect of melodic rhythm on elementary students' and college undergraduates' perception of relative tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 246-257.
6.
Duke, R.A., Geringer, J.M., & Madsen, C.K. (1988). The effect of tempo on pitch perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 108-125.
7.
Geringer, J.M. (1976). Tuning preferences in recorded orchestral music . Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 169-176.
8.
Geringer, J.M., & Madsen, C.K. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 195-204.
9.
Geringer, J.M., & Madsen, C.K. (1987). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded popular music. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 204-212). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
10.
Geringer, J.M., & Madsen, C.K. (2003). Gradual tempo change and aesthetic responses of music majors. International Journal of Music Education, 40, 3-15.
11.
Killian, J.N. (1985). The effect of differential feedback on tempo performance and perception. Contributions to Music Education, 12, 22-30.
12.
Kuhn, T.L. (1974). Effects of dynamics, halves of exercise, and trial sequences on tempo accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 270-277.
13.
Kuhn, T.L. (1977). Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 222-227.
14.
Kuhn, T.L. (1987). The effect of tempo, meter, and melodic complexity on the perception of tempo. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 165-174). Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
15.
Kuhn, T.L., & Gates, E. (1975). Effect of notational values, age, and example length on tempo performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 203-210.
16.
LeBlanc, A. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children's music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 143-156.
17.
LeBlanc, A., Colman, J., McCrary, J., Sherrill, C., & Malin, S. (1988). Tempo preferences of different-age music listeners . JournaL of Research in Music Education, 36, 156-168.
18.
LeBlanc, A., & McCrary, J. (1983). Effect of tempo on children's music preference . Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 283-294.
19.
Madsen, C.K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 57-67.
20.
Madsen, C.K., & Geringer, J.M. (2004). Gradual pitch change and aesthetic responses of music majors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 161/162, 135-144.
21.
Madsen, C.K., & Geringer, J.M. (in press). Context specificity in music perception of musicians. Psychology of Music.
22.
Sheldon, D.A. (1994). Effects of tempo, musical experience, and listening modes on tempo modulation perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 190-202.
23.
Sheldon, D.A., & Gregory, D. (1997). Perception of tempo modulation by listeners of different levels of educational experience. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 367-379.
24.
Sims, W. (1987). Effect of tempo on music preference of preschool through fourth-grade children. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 15-25). Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
25.
Wang, C.C. (1983). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 49-55.
26.
Wang, C.C., & Salzberg, R.S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 123-131.
27.
Wapnick, J. (1980). Pitch, tempo, and timbral preferences in recorded piano music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 43-58.
28.
Yarbrough, C. (1987). The effect of music excerpts on tempo discriminations and preferences of musicians and non-musicians. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 175-189). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
