Evaluations of alternative schools have generally found that these programs have failed to produce positive evidence of effectiveness in reducing delinquent behaviors. Using an experimental design with a one-year follow-up, the present study assessed the effectiveness of one alternative education program in changing students' school-related attitudes, academic performance, and self-reported delinquency. The study found that the program was able to produce short-term effects on grade point average, school attendance, and self-esteem. These effects were not observed at the one-year follow-up. The conclusions focus on the need for more rigorous research that focuses on program implementation issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnove, R. F.
and T. Strout. 1980. “Alternative Schools for Disruptive Youth.”Educational Forum44:453-471.
2.
Bachman, J. G.
1970. Youth in Transition: Volume II. The Impact of Family Background and Intelligence on Tenth Grade Boys. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Bohrnstedt, G. W.
and D. Knoke. 1988. Statistics for Social Data Analysis. 2d ed.Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
4.
Cernkovich, S. A.
and P. C. Giordano. 1992. “School Bonding, Race, and Delinquency.”Criminology30:261-287.
5.
Cohill, M. B.1991. “Why Do I Like Broccoli?”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82:125-132.
6.
Cox, S. M.
, W. S. Davidson, and T. S. Bynum. 1995. “A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Delinquency-Related Outcomes of Alternative Education Programs.”Crime and Delinquency41:219-234.
7.
Cronbach, L. J.
1970. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 3d ed.New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Driscoll, B. M.
, L. Mandell, and S. J. Schneider. 1985. “Alternative Educational Model for Junior High School Students Not Meeting Promotional Standards.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
9.
Duke, D. L.
and I. Muzio. 1978. “How Effective are Alternative Schools? A Review of Recent Evaluations and Reports.”Teachers College Record79:461-483.
10.
Elliott, D. S.
and S. S. Ageton. 1980. “Reconciling Race and Class Differences in Self-Reported and Official Estimates of Delinquency.”American Sociological Review45:95-110.
11.
Elliott, D. S.
, D. Huizuinga, and S. S. Ageton. 1985. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Fagan, J.
and E. Pabon. 1990. “Contributions of Delinquency and Substance Use to School Dropout Among Inner-City Youths.”Youth and Society21:306-354.
13.
Farrington, D. P.
1992. “Explaining the Beginning, Progress, and Ending of Antisocial Behavior from Birth to Adulthood.” Pp. 253-286 in Facts, Frameworks, and Forecasts: Advances in Criminological Theory, edited by J. McCord. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
14.
Frazier, L. H.
and N. R. Baenen. 1988. An Alternative for High Risk Students: The School-Community Guidance Center Evaluation, 1987-1988. Austin: Texas Office of Research and Evaluation.
15.
Garrison, R. W.
1987. Alternative School for Disruptive Youth: NSSC Resource Paper. Malibu, CA: National School Safety Center, Pepperdine University, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
16.
Gold, M.
and D. W. Mann. 1984. Expelled to a Friendlier Place: A Study of Alternative Schools. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Gottfredson, D.C.1987. “Examining the Potential for Delinquency Prevention Through Alternative Education.”Today's Delinquent6:87-100.
18.
Hawkins, J. D.
and J. S. Wall. 1980. Alternative Education: Exploring the Delinquency Prevention Potential. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
19.
Hirschi, T.
1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Hunter, J. E.
and F. L. Schmidt. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Jarjoura, G. R.1993. “Does Dropping Out of School Enhance Delinquent Involvement? Results from a Large-Scale National Probability Sample.”Criminology31:149-172.
22.
Lipsey, M. W.
1992. “Juvenile Delinquency Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Inquiry into the Variability of Effects.” Pp. 83-127 in Meta-Analysis for Explanation: Casebooks, edited by T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, and F. Mosteller. New York: Russell Sage.
23.
Loeber, R.
, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, W. van Kammen, and D. P. Farrington. 1991. “Initiation, Escalation and Desistance in Juvenile Offending and Their Correlates.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82:36-82.
24.
Mak, A.1991. “Psychosocial Control Characteristics of Delinquents and Nondelinquents.”Criminal Justice and Behavior18:287-304.
25.
Pedhazur, E. J.
1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. 2d ed.Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
Raywid, M. A.1981. “The First Decade of Public School Alternatives.”Phi Delta Kappan62:551-554.
27.
Raywid, M. A.1983. “Alternative Schools as a Model for Public Education.”Theory Into Practice22:190-197.
28.
Reilly, D. H.
, J. L. Reilly, and E. L. West. 1982. “An Alternative Learning School: Student Results and System Considerations.”Journal of Instructional Psychology9:122-132.
29.
Reisler, R.
and M. S. Friedman. 1978. “Radical Misfits? How Students from an Alternative Junior High School Adapted to a Conventional School.”Educational Theory28:75-81.
30.
Smith, V. H.
1974. Alternative Schools. Lincoln, NE: Professional Educators.
31.
Thornberry, T. P.
, M. Moore, and R. L. Christenson. 1985. “The Effect of Dropping Out of High School on Subsequent Criminal Behavior.”Criminology23:3-18.
32.
Tracy, P. E.
, M.E. Wolfgang, and R. M. Figlio. 1990. “Prevalence of Delinquency.” Pp. 37-56 in Delinquency Careers in Two Birth Cohorts, edited by P. E. Tracy, M. E. Wolfgang, and R. M. Figlio. New York: Plenum.
33.
Wolf, M. M.
, K. A. Kirigin, D. L. Fixsen, K. A. Blase, and C. J. Braukmann. 1995. “The Teaching-Family Model: A Case Study in Data-Based Program Development and Refinement (and Dragon Wrestling).”Journal of Organizational Behavior Management15:11-68.
