Gender is one of the strongest correlates of delinquent behavior, but gender differences in delinquency have proven difficult to explain. Some analysts have called for gender-specific theories of delinquency, whereas others argue that males and females are differentially exposed to or differentially affected by the same criminogenic conditions. Building on the latter approach, this article draws on Sutherland's theory of differential association and Gilligan's theory of moral development to argue that males and females are differentially affected by exposure to delinquent peers. Analysis of data from the National Youth Survey supports the hypothesis that moral evaluations act as a barrier to reduce or counteract the influence of delinquent peers among females, thereby producing large observed sex differences in delinquent behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, Ronald L.
1985. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Akers, Ronald L.
1994. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
3.
Bebeau, Muriel J.
and Mary M. Brabeck. 1989. “Ethical Sensitivity and Moral Reasoning among Men and Women in the Professions.” Pp. 144-163 in Who Cares? Theory, Research, and Educational Implications of the Ethic of Care, edited by Mary M. Brabeck. New York: Praeger.
4.
Burgess, Robert L.
and Ronald L. Akers. 1966. “A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior.”Social Problems14:128-147.
5.
Burkett, Steven R.
and David A. Ward. 1993. “A Note on Perceptual Deterrence, Religiously Based Moral Condemnation, and Social Control.”Criminology31:119-134.
6.
Caspi, Avshalom
, Donald Lynam, Terrie E. Moffitt, and Phil A. Silva. 1993. “Unraveling Girls' Delinquency: Biological, Dispositional, and Contextual Contributions to Adolescent Misbehavior.”Developmental Psychology29:19-30.
7.
Cohn, Lawrence D.1991. “Sex Differences in the Course of Personality Development: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin109:252-266.
8.
Eisenberg, Nancy
, Richard Fabes, and Cindy Shea. 1989. “Gender Differences in Empathy and Prosocial Moral Reasoning: Empirical Investigations.” Pp. 127-143 in Who Cares? Theory, Research, and Educational Implications of the Ethic of Care, edited by Mary M. Brabeck. New York: Praeger.
9.
Elliott, Delbert S.
, David Huizinga, and Suzanne Ageton. 1985. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Empey, LaMar T.
and Mark C. Stafford. 1991. American Delinquency: Its Meaning and Construction. 3d ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
Erickson, Maynard
, Jack P. Gibbs, and Gary Jensen. 1977. “The Deterrence Doctrine and the Perceived Certainty of Legal Punishments.”American Sociological Review42:305-317.
12.
Gibbs, Jack P.
1975. Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
13.
Gibbs, John C.
, Kevin D. Arnold, and Jennifer E. Burkhart. 1984. “Sex Differences in the Expression of Moral Judgment.”Child Development55:1040-1043.
14.
Gilligan, Carol
. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Giordano, Peggy C.1978. “Girls, Guys and Gangs: The Changing Social Context of Female Delinquency.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology69:126-132.
16.
Giordano, Peggy C.
, Stephen A. Cernkovich, and M. D. Pugh. 1986. “Friendships and Delinquency.”American Journal of Sociology91:1170-1202.
17.
Grasmick, Harold
and Robert J. Bursik. 1990. “Conscience, Significant Others, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model.”Law and Society Review24:837-861.
18.
Hindelang, Michael
. 1974. “Moral Evaluations of Illegal Behavior.”Social Problems21:370-385.
19.
Hindelang, Michael
. 1979. “Sex Differences in Criminal Activity.”Social Problems27:143-156.
20.
Hindelang, Michael J.
, Travis Hirschi, and J. Weis. 1979. “Correlates of Delinquency: The Illusion of Discrepancy between Self-Report and Official Measures.”American Sociological Review44:995-1014.
21.
Johnson, Richard
. 1979. Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Lombroso, Caesar
and William Ferrero. [1895] 1958. Female Offender. Reprint, New York: Philosophical Library.
23.
Simons, Ronald L.
, Martin G. Miller, and Stephen M. Aigner. 1980. “Contemporary Theories of Deviance and Female Delinquency: An Empirical Test.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency17:42-53.
24.
Smith, Douglas A.
and Raymond Paternoster. 1987. “The Gender Gap in Theories of Deviance: Issues and Evidence.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency24:140-172.
25.
Stattin, H.
and D. Magnusson. 1990. Pubertal Maturation in Female Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Steffensmeier, Darrell J.
and Emilie Allan. 1995. “Criminal Behavior: Gender and Age.” Pp. 83-113 in Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook. 2d ed. Edited by Joseph F. Sheley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1947. Criminology. 4th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
28.
Tittle, Charles R.
1980. Sanctions and Social Deviance: The Question of Deterrence. New York: Praeger.
29.
Walker, Lawrence J.1984. “Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review.”Child Development55:677-691.
30.
Warr, Mark
. 1993. “Age, Peers, and Delinquency.”Criminology31:17-40.
31.
Warr, Mark
. 1996. “Organization and Instigation in Delinquent Groups.”Criminology34:11-37.
32.
Warr, Mark
and Mark C. Stafford. 1991. “The Influence of Delinquent Peers: What They Think or What They Do?”Criminology29:851-866.
33.
Wilson, James Q.
and William Herrnstein. 1985. Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.
