Computer crime is a fairly new area of research in criminology and deviance. With the exception of Hollinger, few studies have examined the occurrence of illegal computer acts and virtually none have tried to offer a theoretical explanation for the behavior. In this article, the authors provide data on the lifetime, past year, and past month prevalence of five illegal computer activities from a multistage sample (N = 581) of students at a southern university. The authors also examine the etiology of computer crime by testing the ability of social learning theory to explain these behaviors. Using multiple regression procedures, they demonstrate that measures of differential association, differential reinforcement and punishment, definitions, and sources of imitation are significantly related to computer crime. Findings from this study are compared with Hollinger's data and discussed in terms of why social learning theory is an appropriate and useful theoretical perspective for understanding why college students commit illegal computer acts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, Ronald L.
1973. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Akers, Ronald L.
1977. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. 2d ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Akers, Ronald L.
1985. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. 3d ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Akers, Ronald L.
1994. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
5.
Akers, Ronald L.
1997. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation. 2d ed.Los Angeles: Roxbury.
6.
Akers, Ronald L.
, Marvin D. Krohn, Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, and Marcia Radosevich. 1979. “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory.”American Sociological Review44 (4): 636-655.
7.
Akers, Ronald L.
and Anthony LaGreca. 1991. “Alcohol Use among the Elderly: Social Learning, Community Context, and Life Events.” Pp. 242-262 in Society, Culture, and Drinking Patterns Re-Examined, edited by David Pittman and Helene Reskin White. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
8.
American Bar Association
. 1984. Report on Computer Crime: June 1984. Chicago: Task Force on Computer Crime, Section on Criminal Justice.
9.
Bandura, Albert
. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Burkett, Stephen
and Eric Jensen. 1975. “Conventional Ties, Peer Influence, and Fear of Apprehension: A Study of Adolescent Marijuana Use.”Sociological Quarterly16:522-533.
11.
Fream, Anne. 1993. The Prevalence and Social Learning Predictors of Computer Crime among College Students. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
12.
Gottleber, T. T.1988. “Teaching Ethics in the Community College Data Processing Curriculum.”Community/Junior College Quarterly12:47-54.
13.
Hacker is said to agree to a plea bargain
. 1995. New York Times, July 2, pp. V144, 22.
14.
Hafner, Katie
and John Markoff. 1991. Cyberpunk. New York: Simon & Schuster.
15.
Hanson, Gayle
. 1991. “Computer Users Pack a Keypunch in a High-Tech World of Crime.”Insight, April 15, pp. 8-17.
16.
Hollinger, Richard C.1988. “Computer Hackers Follow a Guttman-Like Progression.”Sociology and Social Research72 (3): 199-200.
17.
Hollinger, Richard C.1991. “Hackers: Computer Heros or Electronic Highwaymen?”Computers & Society21 (1): 6-17.
18.
Hollinger, Richard C.1992. “Crime by Computer: Correlates of Software Piracy and Unauthorized Account Access.”Security Journal2 (1): 2-12.
19.
Hollinger, Richard C.
and Lonn Lanza-Kaduce. 1988. “The Process of Criminalization: The Case of Computer Crime Laws.”Criminology26:101-126.
20.
Kandel, Denise
, Donald Treiman, Richard Faust, and Eric Single. 1976. “Adolescent Involvement in Legal and Illegal Drug Use: A Multiple Classification Analysis.”Social Forces55:438-458.
21.
Kentucky Council on Higher Education. 1992. University of Kentucky fall 1992 enrollment figures.
22.
Kentucky Revised Statutes. 1984. Sections 434.845, 434.850 and 434.855.
23.
Krohn, Marvin L.
, William F. Skinner, James L. Massey, and Ronald Akers. 1985. “Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Longitudinal Study.”Social Problems32 (5): 455-473.
24.
Lewyn, Mark
and Evan Schwartz. 1991. “Why the Legion of Doom Has Little Fear of the Feds.”Business Week, August 6, p. 31.
25.
McEwen, J. Thomas
, Dennis Fester, and Hugh Nugent. 1989. Dedicated Computer Crime Units. Contract no. OJP-85-C-006. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
O'Donoghue, Joseph
. 1986. Mercy College Report on Computer Crime in Forbes 500 Companies: The Strategies of Containment. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Mercy College.
27.
Parker, Donn B.
1976. Crime by Computer. New York: Scribner.
