This article challenges a common view of delinquents as asocial and amoral regarding their support of other people. Support is measured through indications of the willingness to extend assistance to persons at various social and physical distances who are victims of crime. Delinquents seem indeed to be less supportive than other juveniles of people in general. However, when the nature of intervention (direct as opposed to indirect) is taken into account in situations of conflict, delinquents show more loyalty than other juveniles to family and friends. In this respect, delinquents' loyalty is undivided, suggesting that the social cohesion of delinquents may be more particularistic and intense than the more extensive and universalistic support given by other juveniles. Contact with other delinquents is directly related to in-group loyalty and may account for part, but not all, of the relationship between it and delinquency. Further analysis reveals an important departure from an additive model: Delinquents who are involved in dyadic relationships with other delinquents are “too” loyal. The findings are interpreted in terms of Simmel's view of conflict, group structure, and group cohesion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banfield, Edward
. 1968. The Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, Brown.
2.
Bayley, David H.
1985. Social Control and Political Change. Research Monograph No. 49. Princeton, NJ: Center for International Studiesand Research.
3.
Borofsky, G.
, G. Stoolak, and L. Meese. 1971. “Sex Differences in Bystander Reactions to Physical Assault.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology7:313-318.
4.
Briar, S.
and I. Piliavin. 1965. “Delinquency, Situational Inducements, and Commitment to Conformity.”Social Problems13:35-45.
5.
Chodorow, Nancy
. 1974. “Family Structure and Feminine Personality.” In Women, Culture, and Society, edited by M. Z. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Chodorow, Nancy
. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Cloward, Richard
and Lloyd Ohlin. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Groups. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
8.
Cohen, Albert
. 1955. Delinquent Boys. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
9.
Coser, Lewis
. 1969. The Functions of Social Conflict. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan.
10.
Eckland-Olson, S.1982. “Deviance, Social Control, and Social Networks.”Research in Law, Deviance, and Social Control4:271-299.
11.
Empey, Lamar
. 1978. American Delinquency. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
12.
Erickson, B. H.1981. “Secret Societies and Social Structure.”Social Forces60(1):188-210.
13.
Gilligan, Carol
. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Gillis, A. R.1989. “Crime and State Surveillance in Nineteenth-Century France.”American Journal of Sociology95(2):307-341.
15.
Gillis, A. R.
and J. Hagan. 1982. “Density, Delinquency, and Design: Formal and Informal Control and the Built Environment.”Criminology19(4):514-529.
16.
Gillis, A. R.
and J. Hagan. 1983. “Bystander, Apathy and the Territorial Imperative.”Sociological Inquiry53(4):448-460.
17.
Granovetter, M.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360-1380.
18.
Hackler, J.
, K. Ho, and C. Urquhart-Ross. 1974. “The Willingness to Intervene: Differing Community Characteristics.”Social Problems21:328-344.
19.
Hagan, J.
, A. R. Gillis, and J. H. Simpson. 1985. “The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward A Power-Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior.”American Journal of Sociology90(6):1151-1178.
20.
Hagan, J.
, J. H. Simpson, and A. R. Gillis. 1979. “The Sexual Stratification of Social Control: A Gender-Based Perspective on Crime and Delinquency.”British Journal of Sociology30:25-38.
21.
Hindelang, M. J.1973. “Causes of Delinquency: A Partial Replication and Extension.”Social Problems20(4):471-487.
22.
Hirschi, Travis
. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Hirschi, Travis
. and M. J. Hindelang. 1977. “Intelligence and Delinquency: A Revisionist Review.”American Sociological Review42:571-587.
24.
Holden, C.1978. “The Criminal Mind: A New Look at an Ancient Puzzle.”Science199(3):511-512.
25.
Jensen, G.1969. “Crime Doesn't Pay: Correlates of Shared Misunderstanding.”Social Problems17:189-201.
26.
Klein, M.
and L. Y. Crawford. 1967. “Groups, Gangs, and Cohesiveness.”Research in Crime and Delinquency4:63-75.
27.
Kobrin, S.1951. “The Conflict of Values in Delinquency Areas.”American Sociological Review16:653-661.
28.
Kohlberg, L.
1976. “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Development Approach.” In Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, edited by T. Lickona. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
29.
Kohlberg, L.
and C. Gilligan. 1971. “The Adolescent as a Philosopher: The Discovery of the Self Postconventional World.”Daedalus100(fall):1051-1086.
30.
Kornhauser, Ruth Rosner
. 1978. Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Krohn, Marvin
. 1986. “The Web of Conformity: A Network Approach to the Explanation of Delinquent Behavior.”Social Problems33:81-93.
32.
Lavigne, Yves
. 1987. Hell's Angels: Taking Care of Business. Toronto: Deveau and Wayne.
33.
Lerman, Paul
. 1967. “Gangs, Networks, and Subcultural Delinquency.”American Journal of Sociology73:63-72.
34.
Lykken, D. T.1982. “Fearlessness: Its Carefree Charm and Deadly Risks.”Psychology Today16(9):20-28.
35.
Miller, W.1958. “Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency.”Journal of Social Issues14(3):5-19.
36.
Nettler, Gwynn
. 1961. “Good Men, Bad Men, and the Perception of Reality.”Sociometry24:279-294.
Piaget, Jean
. 1965. The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
39.
Piliavin, J.
and I. Piliavin. 1972. “Effects of Blood on Reactions to a Victim.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology23:353-361.
40.
Piliavin, I.
, J. Rodin, and J. Piliavin. 1969. “Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16:299-310.
41.
Plimpton, George
. 1985. Open Net. New York: Penguin.
42.
Rossi, Peter H.
and Steven Nock. [eds.] 1982. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
Schwartz, S.
and G. Clausen. 1970. “Responsibility Norms and Helping in an Emergency.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16:299-310.
44.
Schwendinger, Herman
and Julia Schwendinger. 1967. “Delinquent Stereotypes of Probable Victims.” Pp. 91-105 in Juvenile Gangs in Context, edited by Malcolm W. Klein. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45.
Schwendinger, Herman
and Julia Schwendinger. 1985. Adolescent Subcultures and Delinquency (Research Edition). New York: Praeger.
46.
Short, James F., Jr.
and Fred L. Strodtbeck. 1965. Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Simmel, George
. 1959. George Simmel (Translated by Kurt H. Wolff). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
48.
Simmel, George
. 1969. Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations (Translated by Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix). Toronto: Collier-Macmillan.
49.
Spergel, I.1961. “An Exploratory Research in Delinquent Subcultures.”Social Service Review35:33-47.
50.
Sutherland, Edwin
. 1937. The Professional Thief. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Suttles, Gerald D.
1968. The Social Order of the Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Sykes, G.
and D. Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.”American Journal of Sociology22:664-670.
53.
Sykes, G.
and D. Matza. 1961. “Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean Values.”American Sociological Review26:712-719.
54.
Turk, Austin T.
1982. Political Criminality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Vold, George
. 1958. Theoretical Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Wirth, L.1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.”American Journal of Sociology45(5):743-760.
57.
Wolfgang, Marvin
and Franco Ferracuti. 1967. The Subculture of Violence. London: Tavistock.
