The strain theories of Merton, Cohen, and Cloward and Ohlin do not assert an individual relationship between crime and frustration. The theories assert an aggregate relation between crime and social structural characteristics, but at the individual level those characteristics are neither necessary nor sufficient for criminal activity. These theories cannot be falsified with individual-level data, although they can be falsified with aggregate data. Specific aggregate predictions are derived from each theory and strategies for testing those predictions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berkowitz, L.
1962. Aggression. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Berkowitz, L.
1969. “The Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis Revisited.” In Roots of Aggression, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Atherton.
3.
Berkowitz, L.
1973. “Words and Symbols and Stimuli to Aggressive Responses.” In The Control of Aggression, edited by J. F. Knutson. Chicago: Aldine.
4.
Bernard, T. J.
1983. The Consensus-Conflict Debate. New York: Columbia.
5.
Bernard, T. J.1984. “Control Criticisms of Strain Theories.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency21(November):353-372.
6.
Bernard, T. J.1987. “Structure and Control.”Justice Quarterly4: 409-424.
7.
Blalock, H. M.
1984. Basic Dilemmas in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Burgess, R. L.
and R. L. Akers. 1966. “Are Operant Principles Tautological?”Psychological Record16:305-312.
9.
Cloward, R. A.
and L. E. Ohlin. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
10.
Cohen, A. K.
1955. Delinquent Boys. New York: Free Press.
11.
Cullen, F. T.
1983. Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.
12.
Dollard J.
, L. W. Dobb, N. E. Miller, O. H. Mowere, and R. Sears. 1939. Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale.
13.
Dubin, R.
1978. Theory Building. New York: Free Press.
14.
Durkheim, E.
1951. Suicide. New York: Free Press.
15.
Durkheim, E.
1965. The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
16.
Gold, M.
1963. Status Forces in Delinquent Boys. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Hirschi, T.
1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Hirschi, T.
and M. J. Hindelang. 1977. “Intelligence and Delinquency.”American Sociological Review42: 572-587.
19.
Kitsuse, J. I.
and D. C. Dietrick. 1970. “Delinquent Boys: A Critique.” In Society, Delinquency, and Delinquent Behavior, edited by H. L. Voss. Boston: Little, Brown.
20.
Kornhauser, R. R.
1978. Social Sources of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Kuhn, T.
1970. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Lemert, E.
1964. “Social Structure, Social Control, and Deviation.” In Anomie and Deviant Behavior, edited by M. B. Clinard. New York: Free Press.
23.
Merton, R. K.
1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
24.
Merton, R. K.1983. “Social Structure and Anomie.”American Sociological Review3:672-682.
25.
Nettler, G.
1984. Explaining Crime. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Popper, K.
1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Stinchcombe, A. L.
1975. “Merton's Theory of Social Structure.” Pp. 11-13 in The Idea of Social Structure, edited by L. A. Coser. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
28.
Vold, G. B.
and T. J. Bernard. 1986. Theoretical Criminology. New York: Oxford.
