Despite a long-term interest in the treatment of minorities by the legal system, few criminologists have specifically considered the case of Hispanics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether and to what extent criminal justice outcomes and their determinants differ for Hispanics and non-Hispanics in two southwestern jurisdictions. An analysis of 755 defendants whose most serious charge was robbery or burglary showed major differences between the two jurisdictions. There was no evidence of unfavorable Hispanic treatment in Tucson. Being Hispanic had no effect on the type of adjudication received, verdicts, or sentence severity. Tucson Hispanics received more favorable pretrial release decisions than whites. In contrast, Hispanic defendants in El Paso received less favorable pretrial release outcomes than white defendants, were more likely to be convicted in jury trials, and received more severe sentences when they were found guilty by trial. Interviews suggested that treatment differences in Tucson and El Paso may be due to differences between established Hispanic citizens and less well-established Mexican-American citizens and Mexican nationals, different mechanisms for providing attorneys to indigent defendants, and differential language difficulties in the two jurisdictions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acuna, R.
1972 Occupied America: The Chicano's Struggle Toward Liberation. Caulfield.
2.
Alschuler, A.1975“The defense attorney's role in plea bargaining.”Yale Law J.84: 1179-1313.
3.
Barrera, M.
1979 Race and Class in the Southwest: A Theory of Racial Inequality. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
4.
Bernstein, I. N.
, W. R. Kelly, and P. A. Doyle1977“Societal reaction to deviants: the case of criminal defendants.”Amer. Soc. Rev.42: 743-755.
5.
Bogardus, E.
1943 “Gangs of Mexican-American youth.”Sociology and Social Research (September).
6.
Cameron, M. O.
1964 The Booster and the Snitch. New York: Free Press.
7.
Carter, D. L.1983“Hispanic interaction with the criminal justice system in Texas: experiences, attitudes, and perceptions.”J. of Criminal Justice2: 213-227.
8.
Cooley, W. W.
and P. R. Lohnes 1971 Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.
9.
Daudistel, H. C.
1980 “On the elimination of plea bargaining: the El Paso experiment,” pp. 57-75 in W. F. McDonald and J. A. Cramer (eds.) Plea Bargaining. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10.
Eisenstein, J.
and H. Jacob 1977 Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
Farrell, R. A.
and V. L. Swigert1978“Prior offense as a self-fulfilling prophecy.”Law and Society Rev.12: 437-453.
12.
Garber, S.
, S. Klepper, and D. Nagin 1982 The Role of Extralegal Factors in Determining Criminal Case Dispositions: Toward More Reliable Statistical Inference. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellen Univ. Press.
13.
Gibson, J. L.1978“Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: a methodological critique and a case study.”Law and Society Rev.12: 455-478.
14.
Hagan, J.1974“Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing.”Law and Society Rev.8: 357-384.
15.
Hagan, J.
and K. Bumiller 1983 “Making sense of sentencing: a review and critique of sentencing research,” pp. 1-54 in A. Blumsteinet al. (eds.) Research in Sentencing: The Search for Reform, Volume 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Hagan, J.
, I. B. Nagel (Berstein), and C. Albonetti1980“The differential sentencing of white-collar offenders in ten federal district courts.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 802-820.
17.
Hair, J. F.
, P. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and B. J. Grablowsky 1979 Multivariate Data Analysis. Tulsa, OK: Petroleum Publishing.
18.
Handman, M.
1931 “Preliminary report on nationality and delinquency: the Mexican in Texas.”Special report on Crime and the Foreign Born, Vol. II, National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement.
19.
Holmes, M. D.
, and H. C. Daudistel1984“Race and justice in the Southwest: the sentencing of Anglo, Black and Hispanic defendants.”Social Science Q.65: 265-277.
20.
Jaffe, A. J.
, R. M. Cullen, and T. D. Boswell 1980 The Changing Demography of Spanish Americans. New York: Academic.
21.
Kleck, G.1981“Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing.”Amer. Soc. Rev.46: 783-804.
22.
LaFree, G. D.1980“The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 842-854.
23.
LaFree, G. D.
forthcoming “Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: a comparison of guilty pleas and trials.”Criminology.
24.
Landes, W. M.1974“Legality and reality: some evidence of criminal procedure.”J. of Legal Studies3: 287-337.
25.
McIntyre, D. M.
1967 Law Enforcement in the Metropolis. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
26.
Miller, H. S.
1980 Plea Bargaining in the United States. Volume I. Institute fo Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Georgetown University Law Center. (unpublished)
27.
Miller, H. S.
, W. F. McDonald, and J. A. Cramer 1978 Plea Bargaining in the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
28.
Morales, A.
1972 Ando Sangrando (I am Bleeding): A Study of Mexican-American Police Conflict. Portland, OR: International Scholarly Books.
29.
Nardulli, P. F.
1978 The Courtroom Elite: An Organizational Perspective on Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger,
30.
Partington, D.1965“The incidence of the death penalty for rape in Virginia.”Washington and Lee Law Rev.22: 43-75.
31.
Petersilia, J.
1983 Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
32.
Peterson, R. D.
and J. Hagan1984“Changing conceptions of race: towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research.”Amer. Soc. Rev.49: 56-70.
33.
Rankin, A.1964“The effect of pretrial detention.”New York University Law Rev.39: 641-655.
34.
Rao, C. R.
1952 Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. New York: Wiley.
35.
Rivera, J.1974“Justice, deprivation and the Chicano.”Aztlan4: 123-136.
36.
Savitz, L.
1973 “Black crime,” pp. 467-516 in K. S. Miller (ed.) Comparative Studies of Blacks and Whites in the United States. New York: Seminar.
37.
Skolnick, J. H.1967“Social control in the adversary system.”J. of Conflict Resolution11: 51-70.
38.
Southern Regional Council
1969 Race Makes the Difference. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Council.
39.
Thomson, R. J.
and M. T. Zingraff1981“Detecting sentencing disparity: some problems of evidence.”Amer. J. of Sociology86: 869-880.
40.
Tiffany, L. P.
, Y. Avichai, and G. W. Peters1975“A statistical analysis of sentencing in federal court: defendants convicted after trial, 1967-1968.”J. of Legal Studies4: 369-390.
41.
Trujillo, L. D.1974“La evolucion de `Bandido' al `Pachuco': A critical examination and evaluation of criminological literature on Chicanos.”Issues in Criminology9: 43-67.
42.
Tuck, R.
1946 Not With Fist. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
43.
Tyler, S. L. 1983 The Disposition of Felony Arrests for Hispanic and Anglo Defendants. Ph.D. disseration, University of New Mexico.
44.
Unnever, J. D.1982“Direct and organizational discrimination in the sentencing of drug offenders.”Social Problems30: 212-225.
45.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
1970 Mexican-Americans and the Administration of Justice in the Southwest. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
1977 County and City Data Book. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
47.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
1982 General Population Characteristics: 1980. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
1983 County and City Data Book. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
49.
Wald, P.1964“Pretrial detention and ultimate freedom: a statistical study.”New York University Law Rev.39: 631-640.
50.
Warnhuis, P.
1931 “Crime and criminal justice among Mexicans in Illinois.”Special report on Crime and the Foreign Born. Volume II. National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement.
51.
Young, K.
1922 “Mental differences in certain migrant groups.”University of Oregon Publications1, 11.
52.
Zatz, M. S.1984“Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: a new dimension to an old controversy.”Criminology22: 147-171.
