Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social scientists and social commentators are often quick to impute motives to those who support capital punishment, but there is in fact little direct evidence on public goals of punishment or the way in which these goals influence public support for capital punishment. In a sample survey of Seattle residents, respondents were most likely to choose retribution as the primary purpose of punishment, followed by incapacitation, rehabilitation, specific and general deterrence, and normative validation. A preference for retribution increases dramatically with age, but declines with educational attainment. Proponents of retribution and normative validation are most likely to favor the death penalty, but, contrary to common assumption, retributivists constitute only a minority of those who support capital punishment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, F.A. 1981 The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.

Berns, W. F. 1979 For Capital Punishment. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Bureau of Justice Statistics 1982 Bulletin: Death Row Inmates 1981. Washington, DC: Author.

Cullen, F. T. , K. M. Golden , and J. B. Cullen 1983

“Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward rehabilitation in Illinois.”

J. of Criminal Justice 11, 1: 1-13.

Davis, J. A. 1980

“Conservative weather in a liberalizing climate: change in selected NORC General Social Survey items, 1972-78.”

Social Forces 58 (June): 1129-1156.

Dillman, D. A. 1978 Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.

Durkheim, E. 1949 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

Erikson, K. T. 1966 Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: John Wiley

Flanagan, T. J. , D. J. Van Alstyne , and M. R. Gottfredson 1982 Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

10.

Gelles, R. J. and M. A. Strauss 1975

“Family experience and public support of the death penalty.”

Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry 45 (July): 596-613.

11.

Gibbs, J. P. 1975 Crime, Punishment and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.

12.

Gibbs, J. P. 1978

“The death penalty, retribution, and penal policy.”

J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 69 (Fall): 291-299.

13.

Newman, G. 1978 The Punishment Response. New York: Lippincott.

14.

Packer, H. L. 1968 The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.

15.

Rankin, J. F. 1979

“Changing attitudes toward capital punishment.”

Social Forces 58 (September): 194-211.

16.

Stouffer, S. A. 1955 Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

17.

Taylor, D. G. , K. L. Scheppele , and A. L. Stinchcombe 1979

“Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions.”

Social Problems 26 (April): 413-424.

18.

Thomas, C. W. and S. C. Foster 1975

“A sociological perspective on public support for capital punishment.”

Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry 45 (July): 641-657.

19.

Thomas, C. W. and R. G. Howard 1978 “Public attitudes toward capital punishment,” pp. 407-420 in N. Johnston and L. Savitz (eds.) Justice and Corrections. New York: John Wiley.

20.

Vidmar, N. 1974

“Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty.”

Canadian Psychologist 15 (October): 337-356.

21.

Vidmar, N. and P. C. Ellsworth 1982 “Research on attitudes toward capital punishment,” pp. 68-84 in H. A. Bedau (ed.) The Death Penalty in America. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

22.

Vidmar, N. and D. T. Miller 1980

“Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment.”

Law and Society Rev. 14 (Spring): 565-602.

23.

Warr, M. , R. F. Meier , and M. L. Erickson 1983

“Norms, theories of punishment, and publicly preferred penalties for crimes.”

Soc. Q. 24 (Winter): 75-91.

24.

Zimring, F. E. and G. O. Hawkins 1973 Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Public Goals of Punishment and Support for the Death Penalty

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References