A multistage screening device, called “multiple gating,” is presented to screen delinquent youths from nondelinquent youths. The concurrent validity of the screening device was tested on a sample of 102 12- to 16-year-old boys. The multiple-gating component consisted of three increasingly more expensive sequential assessments. Teacher ratings of the boys' problem behavior in the school constituted the first gate. A risk group derived from this first gate was then assessed again by means of the parents' telephone report of conduct problems at home. The risk group derived from this second gate was subsequently assessed by means of the most expensive screening, an interview with the child and parents about family-management practices. Results show that each successive gate improved the percentage of valid positives, from 24.5% to 56.3%. The three gates produced error rates of 43.8% false positives and 5.8% false negatives. The screening device correctly classified 86% of the recidivists. The average self-reported delinquency of the youths in the risk group was found to be significantly higher than that in the nonrisk group, suggesting the eventual predictive validity of the screening procedure. The multiple-gating procedure classified delinquent and nondelinquent youths as well as an optimal single-stage screening procedure; furthermore, the multiple-gating procedure was 58% less expensive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T. M.
and C. S. Edelbrock1979 ``The classification of child psychopathology: a review and analysis of empirical efforts.”Psych. Bull.85: 1275-1301.
2.
Ageton, S. S.
and D. S. Elliott 1978 “The incidence of delinquent behavior in a national probability sample of adolescents,” in The Dynamics of Delinquent Behavior: A National Survey (MTT 27552, Project Report 3). Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
3.
Alexander, J.
and B. Parsons1973 ``Short-term behavioral intervention with delinquent families: impact on family process and recidivism.”J. of Abnormal Psychology81: 219-225.
4.
Briggs, P. F.
, R. D. Wirt, and R. Johnson1961 ``An application of prediction tables to the study of delinquency.”J. of Consulting Psychology25: 46-50.
5.
Cloward, R. A.
and L. E. Ohlin 1960 Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
6.
Cohen, A. K.
1955 Delinquent Boys. New York: Free Press.
7.
Cronbach, L. J.
and G. C. Gleser 1965 Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
8.
Elliott, D. 1980 Personal communication.
9.
Emery, R. E.
and D. Marholin II1977 ``An applied behavior analysis of delinquency: the irrelevancy of relevant behavior.”Amer. Psychologist32: 860-873.
10.
Farrington, D. P.
forthcoming “Delinquency from 10 to 25,” in S.A. Mednick (ed.) Antecedents of Aggression and Antisocial Behavior. Hingham: Klywen-Boston.
11.
Forehand, R.
and B.M. Atkeson1977 ``Generality of treatment effects with parents as therapists: a review of assessment and implementation procedures.”Behavior Therapy8: 575-593.
12.
Gendreau, P.
and B. Ross1979 ``Effective correctional treatment: bibliography for cynics.”Crime and Delinquency27: 463-489.
13.
Gottfredson. S.D.
and D.M. Gottfredson1980 ``Screening for risk: a comparison of methods.”Criminal Justice and Behavior7: 315-331.
14.
Hollingshead, A. B.
1975 “Four factor index of social status.” Yale University Working Paper, June.
15.
Jesness, C. F.
and W. Wright 1977 “Delinquency prediction and early identification: an overview.”Division of Research, Department of the Youth Authority, California. (unpublished)
16.
Klein, M. W.
1979 “Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: a litany of impediments,” in N. Morris and M. Tonry (eds.) Crime and Justice, 1978. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
17.
Klein, M. W.
n.d. “Labeling, deterrence, and recidivism: a study of police dispositions of juvenile offenders.”University of California, Los Angeles. (unpublished)
18.
Lefkowitz, M. M.
, L.D. Eron, L.O. Walder, and L.R. Huesmann 1977 Growing Up to Be Violent. New York: Pergamon.
19.
Loeber, R.1982 ``The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: a review.”Child Development53: 1431-1446.
20.
Loeber, R.
and T.J. Dishion 1981 “Identification strategies for at-risk youths in the context of children's development.” (unpublished; available from Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 E. 5th Ave., Eugene, OR 97401)
21.
Loeber, R.
and T.J. Dishion 1983a “Antisocial and delinquent youths: methods for their early identification.” Presented at the Vermont Conference on the Primary Prevention of Psychopathology, Bolton Valley, Vermont, June.
22.
Loeber, R.
and T.J. Dishion1983b“Early predictors of male delinquency: a review.”Psych. Bull.94: 68-99.
23.
Meehl, P. E.
and A. Rosen1955“Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.”Psych. Bull.52: 194-215.
24.
Patterson, G. R.1974 ``Interventions for boys with conduct problems: multiple settings, treatments, and criteria.”J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42: 471-481.
25.
Patterson, G. R.
and M.J. Fleischman1979 ``Maintenance of treatment effects: some considerations concerning family systems and follow-up data.”Behavior Therapy10: 168-195.
26.
Patterson, G. R.
and J.B. Reid1973 ``Intervention for families of aggressive boys: a replication study.”Behavior Research and Therapy11: 383-394.
27.
Patterson, G. R.
, P. Chamberlain, and J.B. Reid1982 ``A comparative evaluation of parent training procedures.”Behavior Therapy13: 638-650.
28.
Polk, K.
1975 “School and the delinquency experience.”Department of Sociology, University of Oregon. (unpublished)
29.
Polk, K.
, D. Frease, and F.L. Richmond1974 ``Social class, school experience, and delinquency.”Criminology12: 84-96.
30.
Reid, J. B.
and A.F. Hendriks 1973 “A preliminary analysis of the effectiveness of direct home intervention for treatment of predelinquent boys,” in L.A. Hamerlyncket al. (eds.) Behavior Therapy: Methodology Concepts and Practices. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
31.
Reid, J. B.
and G.R. Patterson 1976 “The modification of aggression and stealing behavior of boys in the home setting,” in E. Ribes-Inesta and A. Bandura (eds.) Analysis of Delinquency and Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Reid, J.B.
, G.R. Patterson, and R. Lorber 1980 “The abused child: victim, instigator, or innocent bystander?” in D. Bernstein (ed.) Response Structure and Organization. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
33.
Reiss, A. J.1951“The accuracy, efficiency, and validity of a prediction instrument.”Amer. J. of Sociology56: 552-561.
34.
Romig, D. A.
1978 Justice for Our Children: An Examination of Juvenile Delinquent Rehabilitation Programs. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
35.
Rutter, M.
, T. Tizard, and K. Whitmore 1970 Education, Health, and Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
36.
Shannon, L. W.
1978 “Predicting adult criminal careers from juvenile careers.” Presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology.
37.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M.
, G.R. Patterson, and R. Loeber 1983 “Parental monitoring and antisocial behavior in boys.” (unpublished; available from Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 E. 5th Ave., Eugene, OR 97401)
38.
Weinrott, M.
1976 “Manual for retrieval of juvenile court data.” (unpublished; available from M. Weinrott, Evaluation Research Group, c/o Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 E. 5th Ave., Eugene, OR 97401)
39.
Wells, K.C.
and R. Forehand 1979 “Childhood behavior problems in the home,” in S.M. Turner and H. Adams (eds.) Handbook of Behavior Therapy. New York: John Wiley.
40.
West, D. J.
and D.P. Farrington 1973 Who Becomes Delinquent?London: Heinemann.
41.
Wiggins, J. S.
1973 Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.
Wolfgang, M. E.
, R.M. Figlio, and T. Sellin 1972 Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
43.
Wolfgang, M. E.
, R.M. Figlio, and T.P. Thornberry 1978 Evaluating Criminology. New York: Elsevier.
44.
Wright, W. E.
and M.C. Dixon1977“Community prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency: a review of evaluation studies.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency14: 35-69.
