Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While the term disparity arises naturally and is used frequently in discussions of discretion and fairness in criminal processing, little attention has been given to formulating precise quantitative indicators of it.

This article illustrates the application of a recently developed technique for measuring disparity. Prosecutorial and sentencing decisions governing the dispositions of 2,234 convicted felons in a single jurisdiction were used to esti mate the amount of variability in sanction severity attributable to (1) "legit imate" factors of offense seriousness and prior record, (2) sentencing discre tion, and (3) prosecutorial discretion.

Approximately one-half of the total variability in sanctions was at tributable to offense seriousness and prior record. Under the assumption that all of the remaining, unexplained variation could be attributed to sentencing and plea bargaining discretion, it was found that sentencing decisions ac counted for a substantially greater proportion of variability than did plea bar gaining decisions. Implications for the development of valid disparity measures are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alschuler, A.W. 1978 "Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power: A Critique of Recent Proposals for 'Fixed' and 'Presumptive' Sentencing." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 126 (2): 550-577.

American Friends Service Committee 1971 Struggle for Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.

Barry, D.M. 1979 "The Effects of Compounding Disparities at Successive Stages of Criminal Processing." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Philadelphia.

Buchner, D. 1979 "Scale of Sentence Severity." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 70 (2): 182-187.

Erickson, M.L. , and J.P. Gibbs 1979 "On the Perceived Severity of Legal Penalties." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 70 (1): 102-116.

Fletcher, G. 1978 Rethinking the Criminal Law. Boston : Little, Brown.

Fogel, D. 1975 "We Are the Living Proof ...": The Justice Model for Corrections . Cincinnati: W. H. Anderson.

Gottfredson, D.M. , and L.T. Wilkins 1978 "Parole Guidelines and the Evolution of Paroling Policy." In Classification for Parole Decision Policy, D. M. Gottfredson et al., eds. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Pp. 1-20.

Gottfredson, D.M. , L.T. Wilkins , and P.B. Hoffman 1978 Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

10.

Gottfredson, M.R. 1979a "Parole Board Decision Making: A Study of Disparity Reduction and the Impact of Institutional Behavior." Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 70 (1): 77-88.

11.

1979b "Parole Guidelines and the Reduction of Sentencing Disparity ." Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 16 (2): 218-231.

12.

Hamilton, W.A. , and C.R. Work 1973 "The Prosecutor's Role in the Urban Court System: The Case for Management Consciousness." Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 64 (2): 183-189.

13.

Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission 1980 Report to the Legislature. St. Paul .

14.

President'S Message To Congress 1975 Criminal Law Reporter 17 (13): 3089-3092.

15.

Remington, F.J. 1969 "A Review of 'Discretionary Justice'." University of Chicago Law Review 36 (3): 884-902.

16.

Singer, R.G. 1979 Just Deserts: Sentencing Based on Equality and Desert . Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

17.

Twentieth Century Fund Task Force On Criminal Sentencing 1976 Fair and Certain Punishment. New York : McGraw-Hill.

18.

UNITED STATES v. WATERS 1970 437 F.2d 722 (D.C. Circuit).

19.

Von Hirsch, A. 1976 Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang.

20.

Von Hirsch, A. , and K. Hanrahan 1979 The Question of Parole. Cambridge, Mass. : Ballinger.

21.

Wilkins, L.T. , et al. 1978 Sentencing Guidelines: Structuring Judicial Discretion. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

22.

Winer, B.J. 1962 Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

23.

Zimring, F.E. 1976 "Making the Punishment Fit the Crime." Hastings Center Report 6 (December): 13-17.

Sentencing Versus Prosecutorial Discretion: the Application of a New Disparity Measure

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References