The Determinants of Larceny: an Empirical and Theoretical Study

Abstract

This study ascertains the characteristics of individuals and their life styles that are differentially related to the risk of personal larceny victimization. Using the "rou tine activity" perspective recently explicated by Cohen and Felson (1979), we analyze 1975-76 National Crime Survey victimization data for the entire United States. The effects of age, race, income, major activity, and number of persons in the household are examined independently and in interaction, via log-linear tech niques. The data indicate that those with a family income of $20,000 or more a year, sixteen through twenty-nine year olds, people who live alone, and persons who are unemployed all face greater than average risks of being victimized by personal lar ceny. In contrast, those with a family income of less than $10,000 per year, those who are fifty or older, and those whose major activity is "keeping house" have less than average odds of being the victims of a personal larceny. These findings are discussed within the routine activity framework and are seen as providing substan tial support for this perspective, indicating that it holds considerable promise as a base from which to develop a general theory of criminal victimization.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen, L.E. , and M. Felson 1979 "Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach." American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588-608.

Conklin, J.E. 1972 Robbery and the Criminal Justice System. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

Feeney, F. , and A. Weir 1973 The Prevention and Control of Robbery. Davis, Calif.: Center on Administration of Criminal Justice.

Glaser, D. 1971 Social Deviance. Chicago: Markham.

Goodman, L.A. 1972a "A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys." American Journal of Sociology 77 (6): 1035-1086.

1972b "A Modified Multiple Regression Approach to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables." American Sociological Review 37 (1): 28-46.

Gould, L. 1969 "The Changing Structure of Property Crime in an Affluent Society." Social Forces 48 (September): 30-59.

Hindelang, M.J. 1976 Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities: A Descriptive Analysis of Common Theft and Assault. Cambridge, Mass. : Ballinger.

1978 "Race and Involvement in Crimes." American Sociological Review 43 (1): 93-109.

10.

Hindelang, M.J. , M. Gottfredson , and J. Garofalo 1978 Victims of Personal Crime. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

11.

Hindelang, M.J. , et al. 1978 Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics-1977 . Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office.

12.

Jackson, B. 1969 A Thief's Primer. New York: Macmillan.

13.

Mansfield, R. , L. Gould , and J.Z. Namenwirth 1974 "A Socioeconomic Model for the Prediction of Societal Rates of Property Theft." Social Forces 52 (4): 462-472.

14.

Nettler, G. 1978 Explaining Crime, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

Penick, B. K. E. , and M. E. B. Owens , III, eds. 1976 Surveying Crime . Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

16.

Reppetto, T.A. 1974 Residential Crime. Cambridge, Mass. : Ballinger.

17.

Simon, R.J. 1975 Women and Crime. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

18.

Skogan, W.G. 1976 " The Victims of Crime: Some National Survey Findings." In Criminal Behavior in Social Systems, Anthony L. Guenther , ed. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

19.

United States Bureau Of The Census 1973 "Who's Home When?" Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office.

20.

1976 National Crime Survey—National Sample Survey Documentation . Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office.

21.

tJ.S. Department Of Justice 1978 Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the United States-1977. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office.