From 2010 through 2015, the city of Buffalo demolished over 2,000 residences. This study examines whether those demolitions resulted in crime reductions.
Methods:
Analysis was conducted at microplaces matching demolished parcels to comparable control parcels with similar levels of crime. In addition, spatial panel regression models were estimated at the census tract and quarterly level, taking into account demographic characteristics of neighborhoods.
Results:
We find that at the microplace level, demolitions cause a steep drop in reported crime at the exact parcel and result in additional crime decreases at buffers of up to 1,000 feet away. At the census tract level, results indicated that demolitions reduced part 1 crimes, but the effect was not statistically significant across different models.
Conclusions:
While concerns over crime and disorder are common for vacant houses, the evidence that housing demolitions are an effective crime reduction solution is only partially supported by the analyses here. Future research should compare demolitions in reference to other neighborhood revitalization processes.
AliprantisD.HartleyD.. 2015. “Blowing It Up and Knocking It Down: The Local and City-wide Effects of Demolishing High Concentration Public Housing on Crime.” Journal of Urban Economics88:67–81.
2.
AllisonP. D.2014. Event History and Survival Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ArnioA. N.BaumerE. P.WolffK. T.. 2012. “The Contemporary Foreclosure Crisis and US Crime Rates.” Social Science Research41:1598–614.
5.
AustinP. C.2014. “A Comparison of 12 Algorithms for Matching on the Propensity Score.” Statistics in Medicine33:1057–69.
6.
BaumerE. P.WolffK. T.ArnioA. A.. 2012. “A Multicity Neighborhood Analysis of Foreclosure and Crime.” Social Science Quarterly93:577–601.
7.
BerlottiF.HughesG.MortariA. P.. 2017. “Spatial Panel-data Models Using Stata.” The Stata Journal17:139–80.
8.
BjerkD.2009. “How Much Can We Trust Causal Interpretations of Fixed-effects Estimators in the Context of Criminality?” Journal of Quantitative Criminology25:391–417.
9.
BoessanA.ChamberlainA. W.. 2017. “Neighborhood Crime, the Housing Crisis, and Geographic Space: Disentangling the Consequences of Foreclosure and Vacancy.” Journal of Urban Affairs39:1122–37.
10.
BoggessL.MaskalyJ.. 2014. “The Spatial Context of the Disorder-crime Relationship in a Study of Reno Neighborhoods.” Social Science Research43:168–83.
11.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D.GueretteR. T.SummersL.PoyntonS.. 2011. “Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits among Geographically Focused Policing Initiatives: A Meta-analytical Review.” Journal of Experimental Criminology7:347–74.
12.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V.. 2011. “An Ex Post Facto Evaluation Framework for Place-based Police Interventions.” Evaluation Review35:592–626.
13.
BranasC. C.CheneyR. A.MacDonaldJ. M.TamV. W.JacksonT. D.Ten HaveT. R.. 2011. “A Difference-in-differences Analysis of Health, Safety, and Greening Vacant Urban Space.” American Journal of Epidemiology174:1296–306.
14.
BrewerC. A.PickleL.. 2002. “Evaluation Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers92:662–81.
15.
ChamberlainA. W.WallaceD. W.PfeifferD.GaubJ.. 2018. “Housing Disinvestment and Crime in a Phoenix Suburb: Exploring the Differential Effects of Investors and Owner Occupants.” Urban Affairs Review54:190–224.
ClarkeR. V.1980. “‘Situational’ Crime Prevention: Theory and Practice.” British Journal of Criminology20:136–47.
18.
CohenL. E.FelsonM.. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review44:588–608.
19.
DomínguezP.RaphaelS.. 2015. “The Role of the Cost-of-crime Literature in Bridging the Gap between Social Science Research and Policy Making.” Criminology & Public Policy14:589–632.
20.
EllenI. G.LacoeJ.SharyginC. A.. 2013. “Do Foreclosures Cause Crime?” Journal of Urban Economics74:59–70.
21.
FrazierA. E.Bagchi-SenS.KnightJ.. 2013. “The Spatio-temporal Impacts of Demolition Land Use Policy and Crime in a Shrinking City.” Applied Geography41:55–64.
22.
GarvinE. C.CannuscioC. C.BranasC. C.. 2013. “Greening Vacant Lots to Reduce Violent Crime: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Injury Prevention19:198–203.
23.
GriffithsE.2013. “Race, Space, and the Spread of Violence across the City.” Social Problems60:491–512.
24.
GuerretteR. T.BowersK. J.. 2009. “Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations.” Criminology47:1331–68.
25.
HackworthJ.2016. “Demolition as Urban Policy in the American Rust Belt.” Environment and Planning A48:2201–22.
26.
KellingG. L.WilsonJ. Q.. 1982. “Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety.” The Atlantic Monthly249:29–38
27.
KirkD. S.HyraD. S.. 2012. “Home Foreclosures and Community Crime: Causal or Spurious Association?” Social Science Quarterly93:648–70.
28.
KondoM. C.KeeneD.HohlB. C.MacDonaldJ. M.BranasC. C.. 2015. “A Difference-in-differences Study of the Effects of a New Abandoned Building Remediation Strategy on Safety.” PLoS One10:e0129582.
29.
LacoeJ.EllenI. G.. 2015. “Mortgage Foreclosures and the Changing Mix of Crime in Micro-neighborhoods.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency52:717–46.
30.
LinC.WalshR.. 2015. “Foreclosure, Vacancy, and Crime.” Journal of Urban Economics87:72–84.
31.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.. 1997. “Violent Crime and the Spatial Dynamics of Neighborhood Transition: Chicago, 1970-1990.” Social Forces76:31–64.
32.
OberwittlerD.WikströmP. H.. 2009. “Why Small is Better: Advancing the Study of the Role of Behavioral Contexts in Crime Causation.” pp. 35–59 in Putting Crime in Its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology, edited by WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. N.. New York, NY: Springer.
33.
OsgoodD. W.2000. “Poisson-based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology16:21–43.
34.
Plerhoples StacyC.2018. “The Effect of Vacant Building Demolitions on Crime under Depopulation.” Journal of Regional Science58:100–15.
35.
PopkinS. J.RichM. J.HendeyL.HayesC.ParillaJ.GalsterG.. 2012. “Public Housing Transformation and Crime: Making the Case for Responsible Relocation.” Cityscape14:137–60.
36.
RaleighE. A.GalsterG.. 2015. “Neighborhood Disinvestment, Abandonment, and Crime Dynamics.” Journal of Urban Affairs37:367–96.
37.
RameyD. M.ShriderE. A.. 2014. “New Parochialism, Sources of Community Investment, and the Control of Street Crime.” Criminology & Public Policy13:193–216.
38.
SampsonR. J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.RowleyT. G.. 2002. “Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology28:443–78.
40.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D.. 1969. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquency in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities. Rev. ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
SilvermanR. M.YinL.PattersonK. L.. 2015. “Municipal Property Acquisition Patterns in a Shrinking City: Evidence for the Persistence of an Urban Growth Paradigm in Buffalo, NY.” Cogent Social Sciences1:1012973.
42.
SkoganW.2015. “Disorder and Decline: The State of Research.” Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency52:464–85.
43.
SmithC. M.2014. “The Influence of Gentrification on Gang Homicides in Chicago Neighborhoods, 1994 to 2005.” Crime & Delinquency60:569–91.
44.
SpaderJ.SchuetzJ.CortesA.. 2016. “Fewer Vacants, Fewer Crimes? Impacts of Neighborhood Revitalization Policies on Crime.” Regional Science and Urban Economics60:73–84.
45.
SpelmanW.1993. “Abandoned Buildings: Magnets for Crime?” Journal of Criminal Justice21:481–95.
46.
WallaceD.HedbergE. C.KatzC. M.. 2012. “The Impact of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Disorder before and during the Housing Crisis: Testing the Spiral of Decay.” Social Science Quarterly93:625–47.
WallaceD.SchalliolD.. 2015. “Testing the Temporal Nature of Social Disorder through Abandoned Buildings and Interstitial Spaces.” Social Science Research54:177–94.
49.
WeisburdD.2015. “The Law of Crime Concentration and the Criminology of Place.” Criminology53:133–57.
50.
WheelerA. P.2017. “The Effect of 311 Calls for Service on Crime in D.C. at Microplaces.” Crime & Delinquency, Online First. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714974.
51.
WolffK. T.CochranJ. R.BaumerE. P.. 2014. “Reevaluating Foreclosure Effects on Crime during the ‘Great Recession’.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice30:41–69.
52.
WorrallJ. L.2008. “Racial Composition, Unemployment, and Crime: Dealing with Inconsistencies in Panel Designs.” Social Science Research37:787–800.
53.
YinL.SilvermanR. M.. 2015. “Housing Abandonment and Demolition: Exploring the Use of Micro-level and Multi-year Models.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information4:1184–200.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
