This article aims to apply a “turning points” framework for understanding the developmental impacts of gang membership in a British sample of young people. The study explores the proximal impact of gang membership on offending, victimization, and a number of attitudinal and experiential outcomes that have been theorized to mediate the relationship between gang membership and offending.
Method:
The authors used data from the Offending Crime and Justice Survey, a rotating panel representative of young people in England and Wales that measured gang membership using the Eurogang definition. The effects of gang membership onset were tested using a propensity score analysis approach.
Results:
As previously reported with American data, gang onset has an impact on offending, antisocial behavior, drug use, commitment to deviant peers, and neutralization techniques. In addition, gang membership increases the probability of unwanted police contact, even adjusting for offending through a “double robust” procedure.
Conclusion:
Despite differences in social context, history of gangs and level of violence, we encounter more similarities than differences regarding consequences of gang membership. The impact on unwanted police contact deserves further research and policy attention.
AldridgeJudithMedina-ArizaJuanjoRalphsRobert. 2012. “Counting Gangs: Conceptual and Validity Problems with the Eurogang Definition.” Pp. 35–51 in
Youth Gangs in International Perspective, edited byEsbensenF.MaxsonC.. New York: Springer.
2.
AndersonElijah. 1999. Code of the Street. New York: W. W. Norton.
3.
AugustynMegan B.ThornberryTerenceKrohnMarvin. 2011. “The Cascading Effect of Gang Membership: Pathways to Maladaptive Parenting.”Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC, November 16–19.
4.
BangHeejungRobinsJames M.2005. “Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models.”Biometrics61:962–72.
5.
BarnesJ. C.BeaverKevin M.Mitchell MillerJ.. 2010. “Estimating the Effect of Gang Membership on Nonviolent and Violent Delinquency: A Counterfactual Analysis.”Aggressive Behavior36:437–51.
6.
BarnesJ. C.BoutwellBrian B.FoxKathleen A.. 2011. “The Effects of Gang Membership on Victimization: A Behavioral Genetic Explanation.”Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice10:227–44.
7.
BendixenMonsEndresenInger M.OlweusDan. 2006. “Joining and Leaving Gangs: Selection and Facilitation Effects on Self-Reported Antisocial Behaviour in Early Adolescence.”European Journal of Criminology3:85–114.
8.
BenjaminiYoavHochbergYosef. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57:289–300.
9.
BernburgJón GunnarKrohnMaivin D.RiveraCraig J.. 2006. “Official Labeling, Criminal Embeddedness, and Subsequent Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test of Labeling Theory.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency43:67–88.
10.
BradshawPaul. 2005. “Terrors and Young Teams: Youth Gangs and Delinquency in Edinburgh.” Pp. 193–218 in European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups, edited byDeckerScott H.WeermanFrank M.. Oxford, UK: Altamira Press.
11.
BrownB. B.2004. “Adolescents’ Relationships with peers.” Pp. 363–94 in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, edited byLernerR. M.SteinbergL.. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
12.
CaliendoMarcoKopeinigSabine. 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.”Journal of Economic Surveys22:31–72.
13.
DeckerScott H.MeldeChrisPyroozDavid C.. 2012. “What do We Know About Gangs and Gang Members and Where Do We Go From Here?”Justice Quarterly30:369–402. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.732101
14.
DeckerScott H.WeermanFrank.. 2005. European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups. Oxford, UK: Altamira Press.
15.
DeckerScott H.WinkleBarrik Van. 1996. Life in the Gang. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DeLisiMattBarnesJ. C.BeaverFevin M.GibsonChris L.. 2009. “Delinquent Gangs and Adolescent Victimization Revisited: A Propensity Score Matching Approach.”Criminal Justice and Behavior36:808–23.
17.
DishionThomas J.SpracklenKathleen M.AndrewsDavid W.PattersonGerald R.. 1996. “Deviance Training in Male Adolescent Friendships.”Behavior Therapy27:373–90.
18.
FinneyNissaSimpsonLudi. 2009. Sleepwalking to Segregation? Challenging Myths about Race and Migration. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
19.
FelsonM.2006. Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
GattiUbertoHaymozSandrineSchadeeHans M. A.. 2011. “Deviant Youth Groups in 30 Countries: Results from the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study.”International Criminal Justice Review21:208–24.
21.
GattiUbertoTremblayRichard E.VitaroFrankMcDuffPierre. 2005. “Youth Gangs, Delinquency and Drug Use: A Test of the Selection, Facilitation, and Enhancement Hypotheses.”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry46:1178–90.
22.
GibsonChris L.SwattMarc L.Mitchell MillerJ.JenningsWesley G.GoverAngela R.. 2012. “The Causal Relationship Between Gang Joining and Violent Victimization: A Critical Review and Directions for Future Research.”Journal of Criminal Justice40:490–501.
23.
GordonRachel A.LaheyBenjamin B.KawaiErikoLoeberRolfStouthamer-LoeberMagdaFarringtonDavid P.. 2004. “Antisocial Behavior and Youth Gang Membership: Selection and Socialization.”Criminology42:55–87.
24.
GuoShenyangFraserMark W.. 2010. Propensity Score Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
25.
HaineyDana L.Wayne OsgoodD.. 2005. “Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How do Peers Matter?”Social Forces84:1109–30.
26.
HallGena PenleyThornberryTerence P.LizotteAlan J.. 2007. “The Gang Facilitation Effect and Neighborhood Risk: Do Gangs Have a Stronger Influence on Delinquency in Disadvantaged Areas?” Pp. 47–61 in Studying Youth Gangs, edited byShortJames F.HughesLorine A.. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
27.
HartupWillard W.2005. “Peer Interaction: What Causes What?”Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology33:387–94.
28.
HavilandAmeliaNaginDaniel S.RosenbaumPaul R.. 2007. “Combining Propensity Score Matching and Group-Based Trajectory Analysis in an Observational Study.”Psychological Methods12:247–67.
29.
HaydenCarol. 2008. Staying Safe and Out of Trouble: A Survey of Young People’s Perceptions and Experiences. Hampshire, England: University of Portsmouth.
30.
HenniganK.SpanovicM.. 2012. “Gang Dynamics Through the Lens of Social Identity Theory.” Pp. 127–49 in Youth Gangs in International Perspective, edited byEsbensenFinn-AgeMaxsonCheryl L.. New York: Springer.
31.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.”Political Analysis15:199–236.
32.
HopkinsMattTilleyNickGibsonKate. 2012. “Homicide and Organized Crime in England.”Homicide Studies. Retrieved June 27, 2013 (doi:10.1177/1088767912461786).
33.
HosmerDavid W.LemeshowStanley. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.
34.
HuizingaDavidHenryKimberly L.. 2008. “The Effect of Arrest on Subsequent Behavior: Findings from Longitudinal and Other Studies.” Pp. 220–54 in The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research, edited byLibermanAkiva M.. New York: Springer.
35.
KatzCharles M.WebbVincent J.FoxKateShafferJennifer N.. 2011. “Understanding the Relationship Between Violent Victimization and Gang Membership.”Journal of Criminal Justice39:48–59.
36.
KleinMalcolm W.2011. “Who can you Believe? Complexities of International Street Gang Research.”International Criminal Justice Review21:197–207.
37.
KleinMalcolm W.MaxsonCheryl. 2006. Street Gang Patterns and Policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
KleinMalcolm W.WeermanFrank M.ThornberryTerrence P.. 2006. “Street Gang Violence in Europe.”European Journal of Criminology3:413–37.
39.
KreagerDerek A.RulisonKellyMoodyJames. 2011. “Delinquency and the Structure of Adolescent Peer Groups.”Criminology49:95–127.
40.
KrohnMarvin D.ThornberryTerrence P.. 2008. “Longitudinal Perspectives on Adolescent Street Gangs.” Pp. 128–60 in The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research, edited byLibermanAkiva M.. New York: Springer.
41.
LeeBrian K.LesslerJustinStuartElizabeth A.. 2010. “Improving Propensity Score Weighting Using Machine Learning.”Statistics in Medicine29:337–46.
LumleyThomas. 2010. Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R. New York: John Wiley.
44.
MatsudaKristy N.EsbensenFinn-AgeCarsonDena C.. 2012. “Putting the ‘Gang’ in ‘Eurogang’: Characteristics of Delinquent Youth Groups by Different Definitional Approaches.”
Pp. 17–34 in Youth Gangs in International Perspective, edited byEsbensenFinn-AgeMaxsonCheryl L.. New York: Springer.
45.
MatsudaKristy N.MeldeChrisTaylorTerrance J.FrengAdrienneEsbensenFinn-Age. 2012. “Gang Membership and Adherence to the ‘Code of the Street’.”Justice Quarterly30:440–68. Retrieved June, 2012http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.684432
46.
McAraLesleyMcVieSusan. 2006. “The Usual Suspects? Street Life, Young People and the Police.”Criminal Justice5:5–36.
47.
McCaffreyDaniel F.RidgewayGregMorralAndrew R.. 2004. “Propensity Score Estimation with Boosted Regression for Evaluating Causal Effects in Observational Studies.”Psychological Methods9:403–25.
48.
MedinaJuanjo. 2013. “Police-initiated Contacts: Young People, Ethnicity, and the ‘Usual Suspects’.”Policing and Society. Retrieved June 27, 2013 (doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.784301).
49.
MedinaJuanjoAldridgeJudithShuteJohnRossAndyCebullaAndreas, 2013. “Measuring Gang Membership in England and Wales: A Latent Class Analysis Approach with Eurogang Survey Questions.” European Journal of Criminology. Retrieved June 27, 2013 (doi:10.1177/1477370813475393).
50.
MeldeChrisEsbensenFinn-Age. 2011a. “Gang Membership as a Turning Point in the Life Course.”Criminology49:513–52.
51.
MeldeChrisEsbensenFinn-Age. 2011b. “The Proximate Impact of Gang Membership: A Turning Point Framework.”Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC, November 16–19.
52.
MeldeChrisEsbensenFinn-Age.. 2012. “The Onset of (Euro)Gang Membership as a Turning Point in the Life Course.” Pp. 169–87 in Youth Gangs in International Perspective, edited byEsbensenFinn-AgeMaxsonCheryl L.. New York: Springer.
53.
MeldeChrisTaylorTerrance J.EsbensenFinn-Age. 2009. “’I got your back’: An Examination of the Protective Function of Gang Membership in Adolescence.”Criminology47:565–94.
54.
MoffitTerrie E.1993. “‘Life-course Persistent’ and ‘Adolescent-Limited’ Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy.”Psychological Review100:674–701.
55.
MonahanKathryn C.SteinbergLaurenceCauffmanElizabeth. 2009. “Affiliation with Antisocial Peers, Susceptibility to Peer Influence, and Antisocial Behavior during the Transition to Adulthood.”Developmental Psychology45:1520–30.
56.
OberwittlerDietrich. 2012. “Why Doesn’t it Happen in Germany, too? Police Legitimacy, Stop & Search Practices and the Role of Neighbourhood Disadvantage.”Paper presented at the Cathie Marsh Centre Seminar Series, Manchester, England, November 9, 2012.
OzerMurat M.EngelRobin S.. 2012. “Revisiting the Use of Propensity Score Matching to Understand the Relationship Between Gang Membership and Violent Victimization: A Cautionary Note.”Justice Quarterly29:105–24. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.561804
59.
PattersonGerard R.DishionThomas J.YoergerKaren. 2001. “Adolescent Growth in New Forms of Problem Behavior: Macro and Micro-Peer Dynamics.”Prevention Science1:3–13.
60.
PyroozDavid C.DeckerScott H.. 2011. “From Colors and Gangs to Caps and Gowns? The Relationship Between Gang Membership and Educational Attainment.”Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC, November 16–19.
61.
PyroozDavid C.FoxAndrew M.KatzCharles M.DeckerScott H.. 2012. “Gang Organization, Offending and Victimization: A Cross-National Analysis.” Pp. 85–105 in
Youth Gangs in International Perspective, edited byEsbensenFinn-AgeMaxsonCheryl L.. New York: Springer.
62.
RalphsRobertMedinaJuanjoAldridgeJudith. 2009. “Who Needs Enemies with Friends like These? The Importance of Place for Young People Living in Known Gang Areas.”Journal of Youth Studies12:483–500.
63.
RidgewayGary. 2006. “Assessing the Effect of Race Bias in Post-Traffic Stop Outcomes Using Propensity Scores.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology22:1–29.
RidgewayGaryMcCaffreyDanMorralAndrewBurgetteLaneGriffinBeth Ann. 2012. “Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A Tutorial for the Twang Package.”Retrieved January 5, 2013(http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/twang/vignettes/twang.pdf).
66.
RorieMelissaGottfredsonDenise C.CrossAmandaWilsonDeniseConnellNadine M.. 2011. “Structure and Deviance Training in After-School Programs.”Journal of Adolescence34:105–17.
67.
RostamiAmirLeinfeltFrederikHolgerssonStefan. 2012. “An Exploratory Analysis of Swedish Street Gangs: Applying the Maxson and Klein Typology to a Swedish Gang Dataset.”Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice28:426–45. doi:10.1177/1043986212458195
68.
SampsonRobert J.LaubJohn H.. 2005. “A Life-Course View of the Development of Crime.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science602:12–45.
69.
SchonlauMatthias. 2005. “Boosted Regression (boosting): An Introductory Tutorial and a Stata Plugin.”The Stata Journal5:330–54.
70.
SharpClareAldridgeJudithMedinaJuanjo. 2006. Delinquent Youth Groups and Offending Behaviour: Findings from the 2004 Offending Crime and Justice Survey. London, UK: Home Office.
71.
ShuteJohnAldridgeJudithMedinaJuanjo. 2012. “Loading the Policy Blunderbuss.”Criminal Justice Matters87:40–41.
72.
SnyderJamesSchrepfermanLynnOeserJessicaPattersonGeraldStoolmillerMikeJohnsonKassySnyderAbigail. 2005. “Deviance Training and Association with Deviant Peers in Young Children: Occurrence and Contribution to Early-Onset Conduct Problems.”Development and Psychopathology17:397–413.
73.
ShortJ. F.StrodtbeckF. L.. 1965. Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
StuartElizabeth A.2010. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and Look Forward.”Statistical Science25:1–21.
75.
SweetenGaryPyroozDavid C.PiqueroAlex R.. 2012. “Disengaging from Gangs and Desistance from Crime.”Justice Quarterly30:469–500. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.723033
76.
ThornberryTerence P.KrohnMarvin D.LizotteAlan J.Chard-WierschemDeborah. 1993. “The Role of Juvenile Gangs in Facilitating Deviant Behavior.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:55–87.
77.
ThornberryTerence P.KrohnMarvon D.LizotteAlan J.SmithCarolyn A.TobinKimberly. 2002. Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78.
van GemertFrankPetersonDanaLienInger-Lise. 2008. Street Gangs, Migration and Ethnicity. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
79.
VigilD.1988. “Group Processes and Street Identity: Adolescent Chicano Gang Members.”Ethos16:421–45.
WeermanFrank M.MaxsonCheryl L.EsbensenFinn-AgeAldridgeJudithMedinaJuanjoGemertFrank van. 2009. Eurogang Program Manual. University of Missouri at St Louis. Retrieved October 10, 2012 (http://www.umsl.edu/ccj/eurogang/EurogangManual.pdf).
82.
WinfreeThomas L.Larry MaysG.Vigil-BackstromTeresa. 1994. “Youth Gangs and Incarcerated Delinquents: Exploring the Ties Between Gang Membership, Delinquency, and Social Learning Theory.”Justice Quarterly11:229–56.
83.
WinfreeL. ThomasWeitekampElmarKernerHans-JuergenWeermanKerstinMedinaJuanjoAldridgeJudithMaljevicAlmir. 2007. “Youth Gangs in Five Nations.”Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA, November 14–17.
