Although recent corporate crime studies have made important advances by investigating how individuals decide to offend, they have paid limited attention to a corporation’s organizational structures. Yet, the extant organizational studies have generated inconclusive evidence when assessing the relationship between financial performance and corporate crime, and few studies have combined organizational and industrial factors in models of corporate crime. Building on strain and opportunity theories and prior research, the authors develop hypotheses about the direct and interactive effects of corporation- and industry-level strains and opportunity structures. The authors test these hypotheses using Clinard and Yeager’s Illegal Corporate Behavior data. In short, the results indicate that the effect of corporation-level strain is more pronounced for corporations marked by lower levels of diversification and corporations that operate in industries experiencing higher levels of strain. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for theory, research, and policy.
AcockAlan C.2005. “Working with Missing Values.”Journal of Marriage and Family67:1012–28.
2.
AikenLeona S.WestStephen G.1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3.
AlexanderCindy R.CohenMark A.1996. “New Evidence on the Origins of Corporate Crime.”Managerial and Decision Economics17:421–35.
4.
AllisonPaul D.2000. “Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: A Cautionary Tale.”Sociological Methods and Research28:301–9.
5.
AgnewRobertCullenFrancis T.BurtonVelmer S.JrDavid EvansT.Gregory DunawayR.1996. “A New Test of Classic Strain Theory.”Justice Quarterly13:681–704.
6.
AltmanEdward I.1968. “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.”Journal of Finance23:589–609.
7.
BakanJoel. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York: Free Press.
8.
Bank Security Report. 2007. Employees Less Likely to Blow Whistle Since SOX. Vol. 36, Issue 3, 2. Boston, MA: Sheshuhoff Info SVC/L McIntosh.
9.
BaucusMelissa S.1994. “Pressure, Opportunity and Predisposition: A Multivariate Model of Corporate Illegality.”Journal of Management20:699–721.
10.
BaucusMelissa S.NearJanet P.1991. “Can Illegal Corporate Behavior be Predicted? An Event History Analysis.”Academy of Management Journal34:9–36.
11.
BaumerEric P.GustafsonRegan.2007. “Social Organization and Instrumental Crime: Assessing the Empirical Validity of Classic and Contemporary Anomie Theories.”Criminology45:617–64.
12.
BensonMichael L.MooreElizabeth.1992. “Are White-Collar and Common Offenders the Same? An Empirical and Theoretical Critique of a Recently Proposed General Theory of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency29:259–72.
13.
BoiesJohn L.1989. “Money, Business, and the State: Material Interests, Fortune 500 Corporations, and the Size of Political Action Committees.”American Sociological Review54:821–33.
14.
BraithwaiteJohn.1984. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15.
BrownMarvin L.KrosJohn F.2003. “Data Mining and the Impact of Missing Data.”Industrial Management and Data Systems103:611–21.
16.
ClinardMarshall B.YeagerPeter C.1980. Corporate Crime. New York: Free Press.
17.
ClinardMarshall B.YeagerPeter C.1987. Illegal Corporate Behavior, 1975-1976. Computer file. 3rd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
ClinardMarshall B.YeagerPeter C.BrissetteJeanne M.PetrashekDavidHarriesElizabeth.1979. Illegal Corporate Behavior. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
ClowardRichard A.1959. “Illegitimate Means, Anomie, and Deviant Behavior.”American Sociological Review24:164–76.
21.
ClowardRichard A.OhlinLloyd E.1960. Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs. New York: Free Press.
22.
CochranPhilipNighDouglas.1987. “Illegal Corporate Behavior and the Question of Moral Agency: An Empirical Examination.” In Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. (Vol. 9, pp. 73–91). Edited by FrederickW.PrestonL. E.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
CohenAlbert K.1955. Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
24.
ColemanJames W.1987. “Toward an Integrated Theory of White-Collar Crime.”American Journal of Sociology93:406–39.
25.
CullenFrancis T.1984. Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
26.
CullenFrancis T.1988. “Were Cloward and Ohlin Strain Theorists? Delinquency and Opportunity Revisited.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency25:214–41.
27.
CullenFrancis T.WrightJohn P.1997. “Liberating the Anomie-Strain Paradigm: Implications from Social Support Theory.” In The Future of Anomie Theory (pp. 187-206). Edited by PassasNikkosAgnewRobert.Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
28.
DaltonDan R.KesnerIdalene F.1985. “Organizational Performance as an Antecedent of Inside/Outside Chief Executive Succession: An Empirical Assessment.”Academy of Management Journal28:749–62.
29.
FarbermanHarvey A.1975. “A Criminogenic Market Structure: The Automobile Industry.”Sociological Quarterly16:438–57.
GardnerWilliamMulveyEdward P.ShawEsther C.1995. “Regression Analyses of Counts and Rates: Poisson, Overdispersed Poisson, and Negative Binomial Models.”Psychological Bulletin118:392–404.
32.
GipsMichael A.2006. “SOX Compliance Full of Holes.”Security Management50:23–24.
33.
GrossEdward.1980. “Organizational Structure and Organizational Crime.” In White-Collar Crime: Theory and Research, (pp. 52–77). Edited by GeisGilbertScotlandEzra.Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
34.
HillCharles. W. L.KelleyPatricia C.AgleBradley R.HittMichael A.HoskissonRobert E.1992. “An Empirical Examination of the Causes of Corporate Wrongdoing in the United States.”Human Relations45:1055–76.
35.
HirschiTravis.1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
HoffmannJohn P.IrelandTimothy O.2004. “Strain and Opportunity Structures.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology20:263–92.
37.
HoltfreterKristy.2005. “Is Occupational Fraud ‘Typical’ White-Collar Crime? A Comparison of Individual and Organizational Characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice33:353–65.
38.
HoltfreterKristy.2008. “The effects of Legal and Extra-Legal Characteristics on Organizational Victim Decision-Making.”Crime, Law and Social Change50:307–330.
HortonNicholas J.KleinmanKen P.2007. “Much Ado about Nothing: A Comparison of Missing Data Methods and Software to Fit Incomplete Data Regression Models.”The American Statistician61: 79–90.
41.
JamiesonKatherine.1994. The Organization of Corporate Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
KarpoffJonathan M.Scott LeeD.MartinGerald S.2006. The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books. Retrieved from SSRN (http://ssrn.com/abstract=652121) May 1, 2007.
43.
KeaneCarl.1993. “The Impact of Financial Performance on Frequency of Corporate Crime: A Latent Variable Test of Strain Theory.”Canadian Journal of Criminology35:293–308.
44.
KornhauserRuth R.1978. Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
McKendallMarie A.WagnerJohn A.III1997. “Motive, Opportunity, Choice, and Corporate Illegality.”Organization Science8:624–47.
46.
MertonRobert K.1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.”American Sociological Review3:672–82.
47.
MessnerSteven F.RosenfeldRichard.1994. Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
Messner0., Steven F. and Richard Rosenfeld. 2007. Crime and the American Dream. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
49.
OsgoodD. Wayne.2000. “Poisson-Based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology16:21–43.
50.
PassasNikos.1990. “Anomie and Corporate Deviance.”Contemporary Crisis14:157–78.
51.
PaternosterRaymondSimpsonSally.1996. “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.”Law and Society Review30:549–84.
52.
PiqueroNicole L.PiqueroAlex R.2001. “Characteristics and Sources of White-Collar Crime.” In Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime (pp. 329–341). Edited by ShoverNealWrightJohn P.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
PiqueroNicole L.PiqueroAlex R.2006. “Control Balance and Exploitative Corporate Crime.”Criminology44:397–430.
54.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
RaudenbushStephenBrykAnthonyCheongYuk FaiCongdonRichardToitMathilda Du.2004. HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Non-linear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
56.
ReissAlbert J.Jr.1966. “The Study of Deviant Behavior: Where the Action Is.”Ohio Valley Sociologist32:1–12.
57.
SimpsonSally S.1986. “The Decomposition of Antitrust: Testing a Multi-Level Longitudinal Model of Profit-Squeeze.”American Sociological Review51:859–75.
58.
SimpsonSally S.2002. Corporate Crime, Law and Social Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SimpsonSally S.2003. “The Criminological Enterprise and Corporate Crime.”The Criminologist28:1–5.
SimpsonSally S.KoperChristopher S.1997. “The Changing of the Guard: Top Management Characteristics, Organizational Strain, and Antitrust Offending.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology13:373–404.
62.
SimpsonSally S.PiqueroNicole Leeper.2002. “Low Self-Control, Organizational Theory, and Corporate Crime.”Law and Society Review36:509–47.
63.
StawBarry M.SzwajkowskiEugene.1975. “The Scarcity-Munificence omponent of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts.”Administrative Science Quarterly20:345–54.
64.
StoneChristoper D.1975. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
65.
StreteskyPaul B.2006. “Corporate Self-Policing and the Environment.”Criminology44:671–708.
66.
SutherlandEdwin H.1949. White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.
67.
TabachnickBarbara G.FidellLinda S.2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
68.
ThompsonJames D.1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
69.
VaughanDiane.1983. Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior: Social Structure and Organizational Misconduct. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
VaughanDiane.1992. “The Micro-Macro Connection in White-Collar Crime Theory.” In White-Collar Crime Reconsidered (pp. 124–148). Edited by SchlegelKipWeisburdDavid.Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
71.
VaughanDiane.2002. “Criminology and the Sociology of Organizations: Analogy, Comparative Social Organization, and General Theory.”Crime, Law and Social Change37:117–36.
72.
YeagerPeter C.1987. “Structural Bias in Regulatory Law Enforcement: The Case of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.”Social Problems34: 330–344.
73.
WeisburdDavidWaringElinChayetEllen.1990. “White-Collar Crime and Criminal Careers: Some Preliminary Findings.”Criminology33:587–98.
74.
WheelerStantonWeisburdDavidBodeNancy.1982. “Sentencing the White-Collar Offender: Rhetoric and Reality.”American Sociological Review47:641–59.
75.
WilliamsRobert J.FadilPaul A.ArmstrongRobert W.2005. “Top Management Team Tenure and Corporate Illegal Activity: The Moderating Influence of Board Size.”Journal of Managerial Issues17:479–96.
