An integrative process model of conflict settlement is developed and compared in the cases of three conflicts. The basic idea is that conflict settlement should be understood as a process unfolding in two steps, each of which needs to be explained. The first step is `getting to the table' (negotiation), the second step is `getting to yes' (agreement). Different conditions must be satisfied for the opponents to take these two essential steps of conflict settlement. Serious negotiations are causally linked to the emergence of a mixed-motives situation, and agreement is dependent on cost-benefit calculations that favor cooperation over self-help. A set of hypotheses drawn from the literature on conflict management is developed into an integrative model of conflict settlement. The model is integrative in that it offers a rationale for considering together hypotheses which are usually discussed separately. The model is applied to three conflicts which have all a territorial component and have all finally been settled in a peaceful way. The conflicts show a similar pattern of conflict management and conflict settlement. The analysis reveals that the successful settlement of conflict in the three cases was due mainly to three factors: a hurting stalemate in the issue-area, a crisis of the security situation of one conflict party, and time pressure. By acting together, these factors brought about conflict-settling agreements which had not been possible before.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allard, Sven , 1970. Russia and the Austrian State Treaty: A Case Study of Soviet Policy in Europe. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
2.
Beglinger, Martin , 1988. `Containment' im Wandel. Die amerikanische Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik im Übergang von Truman zu Eisenhower [Changing `Containment': American Foreign and Security Policy from Truman to Eisenhower]. Wiesbaden & Stuttgart: Steiner.
3.
Bercovitch, Jacob , Theodore J. Anagnosen & Donette L. Wille, 1991. `Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations', Journal of Peace Research28(1): 7-17.
4.
Cronin, Audrey Kurth , 1988. `Eine verpaßte Chance? Die Großmächte und die Verhandlungen über den Staatsvertrag im Jahre 1949' [A Missed Opportunity? The Great Powers and Negotiations on the State Treaty in 1949], in Günter Bischof & Josef Leidenfrost, eds, Die bevormundete Nation. Österreich und die Alliierten 1945-1949 [A Nation Kept in Tutelage: Austria and the Allies 1945-1949]. Innsbruck: Haymon (347-370).
5.
Czempiel, Ernst-Otto , 1981. Internationale Politik. Ein Konfliktmodell [International Politics: A Conflict Model]. Paderborn: Schöningh.
6.
Ferring, Robert L. , 1968. `The Austrian State Treaty of 1955 and the Cold War', Western Political Quarterly21(4): 651-667.
7.
Garrett, Banning N. , 1991. `The Strategic Basis of Learning in U.S. Policy Toward China, 1949-1988', in George W. Breslauer & Philip E. Tetlock, eds, Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview (208-263).
8.
George, Alexander L. , 1988a. `Incentives for U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation and Mutual Adjustment', in George, Farley & Dallin (641-654).
9.
George, Alexander L. , 1988b. `Factors Influencing Security Cooperation', in George, Farley & Dallin (655-676).
10.
George, Alexander L. , 1988c. `Strategies for Facilitating Cooperation', in George, Farley & Dallin (692-711).
11.
George, Alexander L. ; Philip J. Farley & Alexander Dallin, eds, 1988. U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation: Achievements, Lessons, Failures. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Grieco, Joseph M. , 1988. `Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism', International Organization42(3): 485-507.
13.
Grieco, Joseph , 1990. Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Habeeb, William Mark , 1988. Power and Tactics in International Negotiations: How Weak Nations Bargain with Strong Nations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Haslam, Jonathan , 1991. `Soviet Policy Toward Western Europe Since World War II', in George W. Breslauer & Philip E. Tetlock, eds, Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview (469-503).
16.
Kanet, Roger E. , 1973. `The Soviet Union and China: Is War Inevitable?', Current History63(379): 145-149.
17.
Kraus, Albert H. V. , 1988. Die Saarfrage (1945-1955) im Spiegel der Publizistik [The Saar Question (1945-1955) in the Light of the Media]. Saarbrücken: Die Mitte.
18.
Kriesberg, Louis , 1988. `Strategies of Negotiating Agreements: Arab-Israeli and American-Soviet Cases', Negotiation Journal4(1): 19-29.
19.
Kriesberg, Louis, 1991. `Introduction: Timing Conditions, Strategies, and Errors', in Kriesberg & Thorson (1-24).
20.
Kriesberg, Louis & Stuart J. Thorson, eds, 1991. Timing the De-escalation of International Conflicts. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
21.
Larson, Deborah , 1987. `Crisis Prevention and the Austrian State Treaty', International Organization41(1): 27-60.
22.
Larson, Deborah Welch , 1991. `Learning in U.S.-Soviet Relations: The Nixon-Kissinger Structure of Peace', in George Breslauer & Philip E. Tetlock, eds, Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview (350-399).
23.
Levy, Jack S. , 1989. `The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence', in Philip E. Tetlock, Jo L. Husbands, Robert Jervis, Paul C. Stern, & Charles Tilly, eds, Behavior, Society and Nuclear War. New York: Oxford University Press (209-333).
24.
Mahnke, Dieter , 1971. `Verantwortung für Berlin' [`Responsibility for Berlin'], in Aussenpolitische Perspektiven des westdeutschen Staates, vol. 1. München/Wien: Oldenbourg (114-136).
25.
Miall, Hugh , 1992. The Peacemakers: Peaceful Settlement of Disputes since 1945. New York: St Martin's.
26.
Milner, Helen , 1992. `International Theories of Cooperation among Nations. Strengths and Weaknesses', World Politics44(3): 466-496.
27.
Mitchell, C. R. , 1981. The Structure of International Conflict. New York: St Martin's.
28.
Morgenthau, Hans J. , 1954. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 2nd edn.New York: Knopf.
29.
Noack, Paul , 1977. Das Scheitern der Europäischen Verteidigungsgemeinschaft. Entscheidungsprozesse vor und nach dem 30 August 1954 [The Failure of the European Defense Community. Decision-making Processes before and after August 30, 1954]. Düsseldorf: Droste.
30.
Patchen, Martin , 1988. Resolving Disputes Between Nations: Coercion or Conciliation?Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
Schumacher, Winfried , 1992. `Konrad Adenauer und die Saar' [Konrad Adenauer and the Saar], in Rainer Hudemann & Raymond Poidevin, eds, Die Saar 1945-1959. Ein Problem der europäischen Geschichte. Zeitzeugen und Historiker im Gespräch [The Saar 1945-1959: A Problem of European History. Time Witnesses meet Historians]. Saarbrücken: Universitätsverlag (49-74).
32.
Schwarzer, Gudrun , 1990. `The Berlin Regime', in Volker Rittberger, ed., International Regimes in East-West Politics. London & New York: Pinter (189-215).
33.
Schwarzer, Gudrun , 1994a. Friedliche Konfliktregulierung: Saarland - Österreich - Berlin. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung territorialer Machtkonflikte [Peaceful Settlement of Conflicts: Saar - Austria - Berlin. A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Power Conflicts]. Tübingen: Universitas.
34.
Schwarzer, Gudrun , 1994b. Friedliche Konfliktregulierung: Saarland - Österreich - Berlin [Peaceful Settlement of Conflicts: Saar - Austria - Berlin]. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen1(2): 243-277.
35.
Sebenius, James K. , 1984. Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Stourzh, Gerald , 1985. Geschichte des österreichischen Staatsvertrages 1945-1955. Österreichs Weg zur Neutralität [History of the Austrian State Treaty 1945-1955. Austria's Way to Neutrality]. 3rd edn. Graz, Wien & Köln: Styria.
37.
Taylor, Michael , 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Vasquez, John A. , 1992. `World Politics Theory', in Mary Hawkesworth & Maurice Kogan, eds, Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, vol. 2. London & New York: Routledge (839-861).
39.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
Wetzlaugk, Udo , 1985. Berlin und die deutsche Frage [Berlin and the German Question]. Köln: Wissenschaft und Politik.
41.
Wilkens, Andreas , 1990. Der unstete Nachbar. Frankreich, die deutsche Ostpolitik und die Berliner Vier-Mächte-Verhandlungen 1969-1974 [The Inconstant Neighbor: France, German Ostpolitik and the Quadripartite Negotiations in Berlin 1969-1974]. München: Oldenbourg.
42.
Zartman, William I. , 1986. `Ripening Conflict, Ripe Moment, Formula, and Mediation', in Diane B. Bendhamane & John W. McDonald, eds, Perspectives on Negotiation: Four Case Studies and Interpretations. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute, US Department of State (205-228).
43.
Zartman, William I. , 1989. Ripe For Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa, updated edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Zartman, William I. & Maureen A. Berman, 1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
