The claim that environmental factors should be integrated into the concept of security was first made in the early 1980s (for example by Richard Ullman). By the early 1990s, a `second generation' approach appeared, aiming at identifying the causal pathways from environmental scarcity to conflict by means of empirical case studies (for example by Thomas Homer-Dixon and the Toronto Group). This essay reviews the issues raised in the literature of these two approaches - the initial debate and the empirical studies - and goes on to examine a number of conceptual critiques. The emerging `third generation' draws attention to improved methodology, including the comparative study of cooperation as well as conflict as a response to environmental scarcity, which in turn focuses attention on the nature of regimes and of the role of the `state-in-society'.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bergesen, Helge Ole & Georg Parmann, eds, 1996. Green Global Yearbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Boutros-Ghali, Boutros , 1992. An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peacekeeping. UN documents A747/277 and S/24111. Geneva: United Nations.
3.
Bratton, Michael , 1994. `Peasant-state Relations in Postcolonial Africa: Patterns of Engagement and Disengagement', pp. 231-254 in Joel S. Migdal, Atul Kohli & Vivienne Shue, State Power and Social Forces - Domination and Transformation in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Brock, Lothar , 1991. `Peace through Parks: The Environment on the Peace Research Agenda', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 28, no. 4, November, pp. 407-423.
Buzan, Barry; Ole Waever & Jaap de Wilde, 1995. `Environmental, Economic and Societal Security'. Working Papers, no. 10. Copenhagen: Centre for Peace and Conflict Research.
7.
Chazan, Naomi ; Robert Mortimer, John Ravenhill & Donald Rothchild, 1992. Politics and Society in Contemporary Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
Dabelko, Geoffrey D. , 1996. `Ideas and the Evolution of Environmental Security Conceptions'. Paper presented to the 37th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA., 16-20 April.
9.
Dabelko, Geoffrey D. & David D. Dabelko, 1995. `Environmental Security: Issues of Conflict and Redefinition', Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 1, pp. 3-13.
10.
Degnbol, Tove , 1996. `The Interactive Approach to the Study of State and Society Relations', pp. 327-352 in Forum for Development Studies, no. 2. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
11.
Dessler, David, 1994. `How to Sort Causes in the Study of Environmental Change and Violent Conflict', pp. 91-112 in Graeger & Smith.
12.
Deudney, Daniel , 1990. `The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security', Millennium, vol. 19, no. 3, Winter, pp. 461-476.
13.
Dokken, Karin, 1997. `Environmental Conflict and International Integration', pp. 523-539 in Gleditsch.
14.
Dokken, Karin & Nina Graeger, 1995. The Concept of Environmental Security - Political Slogan or Analytical Tool? PRIO Report no. 2. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
15.
Dunlap, Riley E., 1994. `International Attitudes Towards Environment and Development', pp. 115-126 in Bergesen & Parmann.
16.
Ellingsen, Tanja , 1997. `Are All Democracies Methods of Non-Violence?' Paper presented at the Fifth National Conference in Political Science, Geilo, 13-15 January.
17.
Galtung, Johan , 1982. Environment, Development and Military Activity: Towards Alternative Security Doctrines. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
18.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter , 1996. `The Environment, Politics and Armed Conflict - A Critique and Research Proposal'. Paper presented at `Conflict and the Environment', NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Bolkesjø, 12-16 June. [Revised version to appear in Journal of Peace Research, no. 2, 1998.]
19.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter , ed., 1997. Conflict and the Environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20.
Gleick, Peter H. , 1993. `Water and Security', International Security, vol. 18, no. 1, Summer, pp. 79-112.
21.
Goldstone, Jack , 1996a. `Debate', Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 2, pp. 66-71.
22.
Goldstone, Jack , 1996b. `Saving the Environment (and Political Stability too): Institutional Responses for Developing Nations', Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 2, pp. 33-34.
23.
Goodland, Robert, 1994. `Environmental Sustainability: Imperative for Peace', pp. 19-46 in Graeger & Smith.
24.
Graeger, Nina , 1996. `Environmental Security?', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 33, no. 1, February, pp. 109-116.
25.
Graeger, Nina & Dan Smith, eds, 1994. Environment, Poverty, Conflict. PRIO Report no. 2. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
26.
Hauge, Wenche & Tanja Ellingsen, 1996. `Environmental Change and Civil War: A Multivariate Approach'. Paper presented at `Conflict and the Environment', NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Bolkesjø, 12-16 June. [Revised version to appear in Journal of Peace Research, no. 2, 1998.]
27.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1991. `On the Threshold - Environmental Change as Causes of Acute Conflict', International Security, vol. 16, no. 2, Fall, pp. 76-116.
28.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1994. `Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases', International Security, vol. 19, no. 1, Summer, pp. 5-40.
29.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1995. Strategies for Studying Causation in Complex Ecological Political Systems. Toronto: University of Toronto Project on Environment, Population and Security.
30.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1995/96. `Environment and Security - To the Editors', International Security, vol. 20, no. 3, Winter, pp. 189-194.
31.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1996a. `Debate', Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 2, pp. 49-57.
32.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas , 1996b. `Environmental Scarcity and Mass Violence'. Paper presented at `Conflict and the Environment', NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Bolkesjø, 12-16 June.
33.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas & Valerie Percival, 1996. Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict: Briefing Book. Toronto: University of Toronto Project on Environment, Population and Security.
34.
Howard, Philip & Thomas Homer-Dixon, 1995. Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict: The Case of Chiapas, Mexico. Toronto: University of Toronto Project on Environment, Population and Security.
35.
Laugen, Torunn & Leiv Lunde, 1996. `Development Assistance and the Integration of Environmental Concerns: Current Status and Future Challenges', pp. 81-90 in Bergesen & Parmann.
36.
Levy, Marc , 1995a. `Is the Environment a National Security Issue?', International Security, vol. 20, no. 2, Fall, pp. 35-62.
37.
Levy, Marc . 1995b. `Time for a Third Wave of Environment and Security Scholarship?'Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 1, pp. 44-46.
38.
Levy, Marc , 1995/96. `Environment and Security - The Author Replies', International Security, vol. 20, no. 3, Winter, pp. 195-198.
39.
Levy, Marc , 1996. `Debate', Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 2, pp. 58-60.
40.
Lipschutz, Ronnie D., 1997. `Environmental Conflict and Environmental Determinism: The Relative Importance of Social and Natural Factors', pp. 35-50 in Gleditsch.
41.
Lodgaard, Sverre & Anders H. af Ornäs, eds, 1992. The Environment and International Security. PRIO Report no. 3. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
Porter, Gareth , 1996. `Advancing Environmental Security through “Integrated Security Resource Planning' ”, Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Issue 2, pp. 35-38.
48.
Reed, David , ed., 1996. Structural Adjustment, the Environment, and Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan.
49.
Renner, Michael , 1989. National Security: The Economic and Environmental Dimensions. Worldwatch Paper, no. 89. Washington, DC.
50.
Renner, Michael , 1996. Fighting for Survival - Environmental Decline, Social Conflict, and the New Age of Insecurity. New York & London: Norton.
51.
Rogers, Katrina S., 1997. `Preempting Violent Conflict: Learning from Environmental Cooperation', pp. 503-518 in Gleditsch.
52.
Smith, Dan, 1994. `Dynamics of Contemporary Conflict: Consequences for Development Strategies', pp. 47-89 in Graeger & Smith.
53.
Smith, Dan , 1997. The State of War and Peace Atlas. London: Penguin.
54.
Smith, Dan & Willy Østreng, eds, 1997. Environment, Poverty, and Conflict: A Proposal. PRIO Report, no. 3.
55.
Swain, Ashok , 1997. `Displacing the Conflict: Environmental Destruction in Bangladesh and Ethnic Conflict in India', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 33, no. 2, May, pp. 189-204.
56.
Stokke, Olav S. & Davor Vidas, 1996. Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Ullman, Richard H. , 1983. `Redefining Security', International Security, vol. 8, no. 1, Summer, pp. 129-153.
58.
Westing, Arthur , ed., 1986. Global Resources and International Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Waever, Ole , 1995. `Securitization and Desecuritization', pp. 46-80 in Ronnie Lipschutz, On Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
61.
Young, Oran R. , 1994. International Governance, Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
