A persistent question in the study of international conflict centers on the role of democratic political institutions and the initiation of war. Several dyadic examinations of data on regime type and conflict reveal that democracies do not appear to fight one another. This article describes a mechanism within the structure of modern democracies and their foreign policy decision-making process that might explain how the interdemocratic peace functions. When a democracy faces a non-democracy in international conflict, the democratic leader can expect to be the dominant source of `legitimate' information for the domestic news media. As the dominant source of information, the leader can use the resources of his or her office to influence the news content to his or her domestic political benefit. Information reported from the government controlled media of non-democratic regimes is reported as propaganda and dismissed as such. In contrast, when two democracies come into conflict, the domestic news media on both sides accept each other as legitimate sources of information and neither leader can expect to dominate the legitimate sources of news to nearly the same extent. As a result, neither leader can expect to have an overwhelming influence on the content of the news media, and the domestic political costs of war, upon which Kant based his model of a perpetual peace, will far outweigh any potential domestic political benefits received from engaging in conflict. This mechanism also offers an explanation for some of the seemingly inconsistent findings at the edges of the democratic peace, such as covert operations by one democracy against another.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banks, Arthur S. & Robert B. Textor, 1963. A Cross-Polity Survey. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
Bremer, Stuart , 1992. `Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 36, no. 2, June, pp. 309-341.
3.
Brody, Richard , 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce & David Lalman, 1990. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Chan, Steve , 1984. `Mirror, Mirror on the Wall... Are the Freer States More Pacific?', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4, December, pp. 617-648.
6.
Cook, Timothy E. , 1989. Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in the US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings.
7.
Coser, Lewis , 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
8.
Desmond, Robert , 1937. The Press and World Affairs. New York: Appleton-Century.
9.
Dixon, William , 1994. `Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict', American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 1, March, pp. 14-32.
10.
Domke, William K. , 1988. War and the Changing Global System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Doyle, Michael W. , 1986. `Liberalism and World Politics', American Political Science Review. vol. 80, no. 4, December, pp. 1151-1170.
12.
Forsythe, David P. , 1992. `Democracy, War and Covert Action', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 29, no. 4, December, pp. 385-395.
13.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter , 1995. `Geography, Democracy, and Peace', International Interactions, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 297-323.
14.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter & Håvard Hegre, 1997. `Peace and Democracy: Three Levels of Analysis', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 41, no. 2, April, pp. 283-310.
15.
Gochman, Charles S. & Zeev Maoz, 1984. `Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4, December, pp. 585-615.
16.
Gurr, Ted Robert; Keith Jaggers & Will H. Moore, 1989. `Polity II Codebook', Department of Political Science, University of Colorado. Photocopy.
17.
Hermann, Margaret & Charles Kegley, 1995. `Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, December, pp. 511-533.
18.
Hess, Stephen , 1981. The Washington Reporters. Washington, DC: Brookings.
19.
Jaggers, Keith & Ted R. Gurr, 1995. `Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 34, no. 4, November, pp. 469-482.
20.
James, Patrick & John Oneal, 1991. `The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 35, no. 2, June, pp. 307-332.
21.
Kant, Immanuel , 1795/1991. Political Writings. Edited by Hans Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Keene, Karlyn , 1980. `Rally 'Round the President', Public Opinion, vol. 3, no. 1, March, pp. 28-29.
23.
Lee, Jong R. , 1977. `Rallying 'Round the Flag: Foreign Policy Events and Presidential Popularity', Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 2, June, pp. 252-256.
24.
Light, Paul , 1982. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
Lowi, Theodore , 1985. The Personal Presidency: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Maoz, Zeev & Bruce Russett, 1992. `Alliances, Contiguity, Wealth, and Political Stability: Is the Lack of Conflict Among Democracies a Statistical Artifact?', International Interactions, vol. 17, no. 3, September, pp. 245-267.
27.
Maoz, Zeev & Bruce Russett, 1993. `Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace 1946-1986', American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3, September, pp. 624-638.
28.
Maoz, Zeev & Nasrin Abdolali, 1989. `Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 33, no. 1, March, pp. 3-35.
29.
Marra, Robin ; Charles Ostrom & Dennis Simon, 1990. `Foreign policy and Presidential Popularity', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 34, no. 4, December, pp. 588-623.
30.
Mintz, Alex & Nehemia Geva, 1993. `Why Don't Democracies Fight One Another? An Experimental Study', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 37, no. 3, September, pp. 484-503.
31.
Morgan, T. Clifton & Kenneth Bickers, 1992. `Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 36, no. 1, March, pp. 25-52.
32.
Morgan, T. Clifton & Sally Howard Campbell, 1991. `Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight?', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 35, no. 2, June, pp. 187-211.
33.
Morgan, T. Clifton & Valerie L. Schwebach, 1992. `Take Two Democracies and Call Me in the Morning', International Interactions, vol. 17, no. 4, December, pp. 305-320.
34.
Neustadt, Richard , 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.
35.
Nixon, Raymond B. , 1960. `Factors Related to Freedom in National Press Systems', Journalism Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, March, pp. 13-28.
36.
Nixon, Raymond B. , 1965. `Freedom in the World's Press: A Fresh Appraisal with New Data', Journalism Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, March, pp. 3-14, 118-118.
37.
Rousseau, David L. ; Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter & Paul K. Huth, 1996. `Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-88', American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 3, September, pp. 512-533.
38.
Rummel, Rudolph , 1983. `Libertarianism and International Violence', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 27, no. 1, March, pp. 27-71.
39.
Russett, Bruce , 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
Russett, Bruce & William Antholis, 1992. `Do Democracies Fight Each Other? Evidence from the Peloponnesian War', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 29, no. 4, November, pp. 415-434.
41.
Simon, Dennis & Charles Ostrom, 1988. `The Politics of Prestige: Popular Support and the Modern Presidency', Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, Fall, pp. 741-759.
42.
Singer, J. David & Melvin Small, 1972. The Wages of War. New York: Wiley.
43.
Small, Melvin & J. David Singer, 1976. `The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816-1965', Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, vol. 1, no. 1, Fall, pp. 50-69.
44.
Small, Melvin & J. David Singer, 1982. Resort to Arms. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Smoller, Fredric T. 1990. The Six O'Clock Presidency: A Theory of Presidential Press Relations in the Age of Television. New York: Praeger.
46.
Van Belle, Douglas A. , 1993. `Domestic Political Imperatives and Rational Models of Foreign Policy Decision-making', pp. 151-183 in David Skidmore & Valerie M. Hudson, eds, The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
Van Belle, Douglas A. , 1995. `Managing to Miss Opportunity: Domestic Political Imperatives and Clinton's Policy Towards Haiti'. Paper presented at the 1995 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
48.
Vincent, Jack E. , 1987. `Freedom and International Conflict: Another Look', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, March, pp. 103-112.
49.
Weede, Erich , 1984. `Democracy and War Involvement', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4, December, pp. 649-664.
50.
Weede, Erich , 1992. `Some Simple Calculations on Democracy and War Involvement', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 29, no. 4, November, pp. 377-383.
51.
Zinnes, Dina , 1980. `Why War? Evidence on the Outbreak of International Conflict', pp. 331-360 in Ted Robert Gurr, ed., Handbook of Political Conflict. New York: Free Press.
