In contrast to mainstream International Relations and Peace Research, it is argued that the growing body of `critical theoretical' literature can be better grasped in terms of a return to particular, local and timely matters and to practical philosophy than as utterly relativist/nihilist meta-theorizing. In this review of recent books of Toulmin, Walker, Der Derian and Gill, it is thus appropriate to talk about an emerging `late-Modern reconstructivism'. The `return' to particular, local and timely does not mean sinking into the vice of parochialism. Rather, in Walker's terms, the point is that International Relations and Peace Research should be able to break with the Modern particular/universal and inside/outside dichotomies inherent in all standard accounts of political communities. It is finally also suggested how it might be plausible to reconstruct the notions of `world citizenship' and `global security community'.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alker Jr , Hayward R., 1986. `The Presumption of Anarchy in World Politics', a revised version of the paper delivered as a Griffith Lecture at the American University, 10 March 1986, prepared for inclusion in H. R. Alker & R. Ashley, eds, After Neorealism: Anarchy, Power, and International Collaboration.
2.
Alker Jr , Hayward R., 1992. `The Humanistic Moment in International Studies: Reflections in Machiavelli and Las Casas', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, December, pp. 347-371.
3.
Ashley, Richard K. , 1987. `The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics', Alternatives, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 403-434.
4.
Bernstein, Richard , 1992. The New Constellation. Cambridge: Polity.
5.
Bhaskar, Roy , 1991. Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
6.
Bhaskar, Roy , 1993. Dialectic. The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.
7.
Campbell, David , 1991. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Campbell, David , 1993. Politics Without Principle. Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Rienner.
9.
Connolly, William , 1991. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
10.
Cox, Robert W. , 1992. `Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun', pp. 132-159 in J. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel, eds, Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Der Derian, James , 1987. On Diplomacy. A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12.
Deutsch, Karlet al. , 1958. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland & Iver B. Neumann, 1993. `International Relations as a Cultural System: An Agenda for Research', Cooperation & Conflict, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 233-264.
14.
Foucault, Michel , 1979. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.
15.
George, Jim , 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Reiner.
16.
Guzzini, Stefano , Heikki Patomäki & R. B. J. Walker, forthcoming. `Theorizing Peaceful Change: A Concluding Trialogue', in H. Patomäki, ed., Peaceful Changes in World Politics.
17.
Hansen, Lene , forthcoming. `R. B. J. Walker: State Sovereignty and International Relations', in I. B. Neumann & O. Waever, eds, Masters in the Making. Ten International Relations Theorists Assessed. London: Routledge.
18.
Hiley, David R. , et al., ed., 1991. The Interpretative Turn. Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
19.
Keohane, Robert O. , 1988. `International Institutions: Two Approaches', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, December, pp. 379-396.
20.
Neumann, Iver & Ole Waever, eds, forthcoming. Masters in the Making. Ten International Relations Theorists Assessed. London: Routledge.
21.
Palan, Ronen P. & Barry Gills, 1994. Transcending the State-Global Divide: A Neostructuralist Agenda in International Relations. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Rienner.
22.
Patomäki, Heikki , 1992. Critical Realism and World Politics. An Explication of a Critical Theoretical and Possibilistic Methodology for the Study of World Politics. Studies on Political Science no. 12, Department of Political Science, University of Turku.
23.
Patomäki, Heikki , forthcoming. `From Power-Balancing and “Collective Security” to a Pluralist Security Community in the Middle East', a version of the paper `Cultivating the Mood of Grieving Delight' presented at the second EuPRA Conference in Budapest, Hungary, 12-14 November 1993, in J. Calleja & H. Wiberg, eds, Peace Research Across the Mediterranean, a work in progress.
24.
Peterson, V. Spike , ed., 1992. Gendered States. Feminist (Re) Visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Rienner.
25.
Rosow, Stephen J. ; Inayatullah Naeem, & Rupert Mark, eds, forthcoming. The Global Economy as Political Space. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Rienner.
26.
Simons, Herbert W. , ed., 1990. The Rhetorical Turn. Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago IL & London: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Sørensen, Georg , 1991. `A Revised Paradigm for International Relations: The “Old” Images and the Postmodernist Challenge', Cooperation & Conflict, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 85-116.
28.
Walker, R. B. J. , 1988. One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
29.
Walker, R. B. J. , forthcoming. From International Relations to World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
