Most empirical research on international conflict has focused on national, dyadic, and systemic attributes to understand state behavior. Following the ideas of Vasquez & Mansbach, this study argues that scholars must take into account the issues and their salience over which states are in dispute in order to explain the onset and escalation of conflict. The article begins with a review of the most prominent data sets and models in the subfield. Most of the prominent theoretical approaches explicitly or implicitly ignore the issues in dispute. Furthermore, only a few of the available conflict data sets include issue components and even then only in a limited fashion. Several reasons for this are reviewed, including those related to realpolitik, ignoring the decision-making level of analysis, and methodological difficulties. There are some studies that do look at issues and their salience when trying to explain the incidence and escalation of international conflict. Almost uniformly, these demonstrate that foreign policy behavior varies by issue area and that states are more willing to fight for issues that they regard as important. The remaining part of the study is devoted to demonstrating how issues and their salience can affect decisions to use military conflict and discussing how these concerns might be integrated into international conflict research. Specific suggestions are offered concerning incorporating issues in research design, identifying issues, and measuring their salience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, Graham , 1971. Essence of Decision. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
2.
Brewer, Thomas , 1973. `Issue and Context Variations in Foreign Policy', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 17, no. 1, March, pp. 89-114.
3.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce ; David Newman & Alvin Rabushka, 1985. Forecasting Political Events: The Future of Hong Kong. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Choucri, Nazli & Robert North, 1975. Nations in Conflict. San Franciso, CA: Freeman.
6.
Deutsch, Karl & J. David Singer, 1964. `Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability', World Politics, vol. 16, no. 3, April, pp. 390-406.
7.
Diehl, Paul , forthcoming. `The Correlates of War Project: A Bibliographic Essay', International Studies Notes.
8.
Diehl, Paul & Gary Goertz, 1991a. `Entering International Society: Military Conflict and National Independence, 1816-1980', Comparative Political Studies, vol. 23, no. 4, January, pp. 497-518.
9.
Diehl, Paul & Gary Goertz, 1991b. `Interstate Conflict Over Exchanges of Homeland Territory, 1816-1980', Political Geography Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 4, October, pp. 342-355.
10.
Doran, Charles & Wes Parsons, 1980. `War and the Cycle of Relative Power', American Political Science Review, vol. 74, no. 4, December, pp. 947-965.
11.
Gamson, William & Andre Modigliani, 1971. Untangling the Cold War. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
12.
George, Alexander ; David Hall & William Simons, 1971. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
13.
Gilpin, Robert , 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Gochman, Charles & Russell Leng, 1983. `Realpolitik and the Road to War: An Analysis of Attributes and Behavior', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 1, March, pp. 97-120.
15.
Gochman, Charles & Zeev Maoz, 1984. `Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4, December, pp. 585-615.
16.
Goertz, Gary & Paul Diehl, 1990. `Territorial Changes and Recurring Conflict', pp. 57-72 in Charles Gochman & Alan Sabrosky, eds, Prisoners of War?: Nation-States in the Modern Era. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17.
Goertz, Gary & Paul Diehl, 1992. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. London: Routledge.
18.
Holsti, Kalevi , 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, Morton , 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
Leng, Russell & J. David Singer, 1988. `Militarized Interstate Crises: The BCOW Typology and its Applications', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2, June, pp. 115-174.
22.
Levy, Jack , 1983a. War in the Modern Great Power System. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
23.
Levy, Jack , 1983b. `Misperception and the Causes of War', World Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, October, pp. 76-99.
24.
Levy, Jack , 1989a. `The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence', pp. 210-333 in Philip Tetlock, Jo Husbands, Paul Stern & Charles Tilly, eds, Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War. Vol. I. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
Levy, Jack , 1989b. `The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique', pp. 259-288 in Manus Midlarsky, ed., Handbook of War Studies. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
26.
Luard, Evan , 1968. Conflict and Peace in the Modern International System. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
27.
Mandel, Robert , 1980. `Roots of Modern Interstate Border Disputes', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, no. 3, September, pp. 427-454.
28.
Mansbach, Richard & John Vasquez, 1981a. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
29.
Mansbach, Richard & John Vasquez, 1981b. `The Effect of Actor and Issue Classifications on the Analysis of Global Conflict-Cooperation', Journal of Politics, vol. 43, no. 3, August, pp. 861-874.
30.
Maoz, Zeev & Bruce Russett, 1991. `Alliance, Contiguity, Wealth, and Political Stability: Is the Lack of Conflict Among Democracies a Statistical Artifact?', International Interactions, vol. 17, no. 3, Spring, pp. 245-265.
31.
McGinnis, Michael , 1986. `Issue Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 30, no. 1, March, pp. 141-170.
32.
McGowan, Patrick ; Harvey Starr, Gretchen Hower, Richard Merritt & Dina Zinnes, 1988. `International Data as a Natural Resource', International Interactions, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 101-113.
33.
Merritt, Richard & Dina Zinnes, 1988. `Data Development for International Research', International Interactions, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 95-100.
34.
Midlarsky, Manus , ed., 1989. Handbook of War Studies. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
35.
Morgan, T. Clifton , 1990. `Issue Linkages in International Crisis Bargaining', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 2, May, pp. 311-333.
36.
Morgenthau, Hans , 1960. Politics Among Nations. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
37.
Morrow, James , 1986. `A Spatial Model of International Conflict', American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4, December, pp. 1131-1150.
38.
Most, Benjamin & Harvey Starr, 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
39.
O'Leary, Michael , 1976. `The Role of Issues', pp. 319-325 in James Rosenau, ed., In Search of Global Patterns. New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
O'Neill, Barry, 1990. `A Survey of Game Theory Models on Peace and War', Occasional Paper Number 9. Toronto: York Center for International and Strategic Studies.
41.
Organski, A. F. K. & Jacek Kugler, 1980. The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Pearson, Frederic & Robert Baumann. 1989. `International Military Intervention, 1946-1988', DDIR-Update, vol. 4, no. 2, January, pp. 7-9.
43.
Randle, Robert , 1987. Issues in the History of International Relations. New York, NY: Praeger.
44.
Richardson, Lewis , 1960. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Pittsburgh, PA: Boxwood Press.
45.
Rosenau, James , 1967. `Foreign Policy as an Issue Area', pp. 11-50 in James Rosenau, ed., Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. New York, NY: Free Press.
46.
Singer, J. David , 1980. `Introduction', pp. xiii-xxxviii in J. David Singer, ed., The Correlates of War II: Testing Some Realpolitik Models. New York, NY: Free Press.
47.
Small, Melvin & J. David Singer, 1982. Resort to Arms. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Van Evera, Stephen , 1984. `The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War', International Security, vol. 9, no. 1, Summer, pp. 58-107.
49.
Vasquez, John , 1983a. The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
50.
Vasquez, John , 1983b. `The Tangibility of Issues and Global Conflict: A Test of Rosenau's Issue Area Typology', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 20, no. 2, June, pp. 179-192.
51.
Vasquez, John & Richard Mansbach, 1984. `The Role of Issues in Global Cooperation and Conflict', British Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, no. 4, October, pp. 411-433.
52.
Waltz, Kenneth , 1964. `The Stability of a Bipolar World', Daedalus, vol. 43, no. 3, Summer, pp. 881-909.
53.
Wilkenfeld, Michael & Michael Brecher, 1989. `International Crisis Behavior Datasets', DDIR-Update, vol. 4, no. 1, October, pp. 1-12.
54.
Wish, Naomi , 1980. `Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role Conceptions', International Studies Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, December, pp. 532-544.
55.
Wright, Quincy , 1955. The Study of International Relations. New York, NY: Appleton.
56.
Zimmerman, William , 1973, `Issue Area and Foreign Policy Process: A Research Note in Search of a General Theory', American Political Science Review, vol. 47, no. 4, December, pp. 1204-1212.
