The article raises the question of the optimal strategy for ensuring the long-term security of small, contiguous neighbors of great powers. The main options available to the small state may be called `accommodation' and `intransigence'. The author seeks to determine whether the small state's choice makes a difference to the great power next door. One of several possible avenues to an answer is to look for observable changes in great power policy which may conceivably be attributed to the small state's policy. Thus, the author evaluates possible effects of Turkish and Norwegian accommodative policies vis-a-vis the USSR in the 1964-88 period, by comparing the Soviet deployment of ground forces near these two neighbors. Data are drawn primarily from The Military Balance. The data show different patterns over time on the two NATO flanks: In the north there is no sign of change, whereas in the south there are easily observable reductions stretching over most of Turkey's most accommodative period. The author suggests in conclusion that accommodation is probably an inappropriate choice for Norway given strategic conditions in the north, while it may have fitted the south flank well during this period.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agmon, Marcy , 1986. `Defending the Upper Gulf: Turkey's Forgotten Partnership', Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 21, no. 1, January, pp. 81-97.
2.
Bach, Quintin V. S. , 1987. Soviet Economic Assistance to the Less Developed Countries. A Statistical Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon.
3.
Binder, John J. & Robert W. Clawson, 1982. `Warsaw Pact Ground Forces: Formations, Combat Doctrine, and Capabilities', in R. W. Clawson & Lawrence S. Kaplan, eds, The Warsaw Pact: Political Purpose and Military Means. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
4.
Blasier, Cole , 1976. The Hovering Giant. US Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5.
Buzan, Barry , 1976. `The Status and Future of the Montreux Convention', Survival, vol. 18, no. 6, November/December, pp. 242-247.
6.
Carus, W. Seth , 1983. `The Evolution of Soviet Military Power Since 1965', appendix, pp. 176-230, in E. N. Luttwak, ed., The Grand Strategy of the Soviet Union. New York: St Martin's.
7.
Chay, John & Thomas E. Ross, eds, 1986. Buffer States in World Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Collins, John M. 1978. American and Soviet Military Trends Since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
9.
Collins, John M. , 1980. US-Soviet Military Balance: Concepts and Capabilities, 1960-1980. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Dunn, Keith A. , 1981. `Constraints on the USSR in Southwest Asia', Orbis, vol. 25, no. 3, Fall, pp. 607-620.
11.
Eaton, Robert S. , 1987. `Soviet Relations with Greece and Turkey', Occasional Papers, no. 2. Athens: Hellenic Foundation for Defense and Foreign Policy.
12.
Erickson, John , 1977a. `Soviet Ground Forces and the Conventional Mode of Operations', Military Review, vol. 57, January, pp. 49-56.
13.
Erickson, John , 1977b. `Trends in the Soviet Combined Arms Concept', Strategic Review, vol. 5, no. 1, Winter, pp. 38-53.
14.
Erickson, John , 1982a. `Military Management and Modernization Within the Warsaw Pact', in Robert W. Clawson & Lawrence S. Kaplan, eds, The Warsaw Pact: Political Purpose and Military Means. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
15.
Erickson, John , 1982b. `The Soviet View of Deterrence', Survival, vol. 24, no. 6, November/December, pp. 242-251.
16.
Erickson, John ; Lynn Hansen & William Schneider, 1986. Soviet Ground Forces. An Operational Assessment. London: Croom Helm.
17.
Finley, David D. , 1980. `Conventional Arms in Soviet Foreign Policy', World Politics, vol. 33, no. 1, October, pp. 1-35.
18.
Fischer, Robert L. , 1976. `Defending the Central Front: The Balance of Forces', Adelphi Papers, no. 127.
19.
Forsvarsdepartementet, 1985. Aktuelle forsvarsspørsmål no. 0185. Oslo: Ministry of Defense.
20.
Forsvarsdepartementet , 1990. Fakta om forsvaret (annual publication). Oslo: Ministry of Defense.
21.
Fox, Annette B. , 1959. The Power of Small States. Diplomacy in World War II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Fox, Annette B. , 1977. The Politics of Attraction. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
Garder, Michel , 1966. A History of the Soviet Army. London: Pall Mall.
24.
Gelman, Harry, 1982. `The Soviet Far East Buildup and Soviet Risk-Taking Against China', Rand Project Air Force Report R-2943-AF. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
25.
Gleditsch, Nils P. , 1986. `The Strategic Significance of the Nordic Countries', Current Research on Peace and Violence, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 28-42.
26.
Gonlubol, Mehmet , 1975. `NATO and Turkey', in K. H. Karpat, ed., Turkey's Foreign Policy in Transition, 1950-1974. Leiden: Brill.
27.
Gurkan, Ihsan , 1980. NATO, Turkey, and the Southern Flank: A Mideastern Perspective. Agenda Papers, no. 11. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
28.
Handel, Michael , 1981. Weak States in the International System. London: Cass.
29.
Harris, George S. , 1985. Turkey: Coping with Crisis. Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Henze, Paul B. , 1982. `Turkey, the Alliance, and the Middle East: Problems and Opportunities in Historical Perspective', Working Paper, no. 36. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center.
31.
Holloway, David , 1983. The Soviet Union and the Arms Race. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Holst, Johan J. , 1967. Norsk sikkerhetspolitikk i strategisk perspektiv (Norwegian Security Policy in Strategic Perspective), 2 vols. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
33.
Huth, Paul , 1988. `Extended Deterrence and the Outbreak of War', American Political Science Review, vol. 82, no. 2, June, pp. 423-443.
34.
Huth, Paul & Bruce Russett, 1984. `What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980', World Politics, vol. 36, no. 4, July, pp. 496-526.
35.
Huth, Paul & Bruce Russett, 1990. `Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference', World Politics, vol. 42, no. 4, July, pp. 466-501.
36.
Jabber, Paul & Roman Kolkowicz, 1981. `The Arab-Israeli Wars of 1967 and 1973', in Kaplan (1981).
37.
Jervis, Robert , 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Kan, Aleksander , 1988. Naboskap under kald krig og perestrojka. Forholdet Norge-Sovjet sett fra Moskva. Forsvarsstudier, no. 6. Oslo: Institute for Defence Studies.
39.
Kaplan, Stephen S. , 1981. Diplomacy of Power: Soviet Armed Forces as a Political Instrument. Washington, DC: Brookings.
40.
Karpat, Kemal H. , 1975. `War on Cyprus: The Tragedy of Enosis', in K. H. Karpat, ed., Turkey's Foreign Policy in Transition, 1950-1974. Leiden: Brill.
41.
Knowlton, William A. , 1977. `Security in the Mediterranean', Atlantic Community Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 3, Fall, pp. 351-358.
42.
Lebow, Richard N. & Janice G. Stein, 1990. `Deterrence: The Elusive Dependent Variable', World Politics, vol. 42, no. 3, April, pp. 336-369.
Lundestad, Geir , 1980. America, Scandinavia, and the Cold War, 1945-1949. Oslo/New York: Norwegian University Press/Columbia University Press.
45.
Mathisen, Trygve , 1971. The Functions of Small States in the Strategies of the Great Powers. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
46.
Military Balance, The, annual. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
47.
Montreux Convention, 1952. `Convention concernant le régime de détroits signée à Montreux, le 20 juillet 1936', Revue générale de droit international public, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 300-312.
48.
Norske Atlanterhavskomité, Den, annual. `The Balance of Strength in Northern Europe', addendum to The Military Balance. Oslo: Norwegian Atlantic Committee.
49.
NOU , 1978:9. `Forsvarskommisjonen av 1974', Norges Offentlige Utredninger 1978, no. 9. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
50.
NUPÅ , 1975. Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Årbok 1975. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
51.
Partem, Michael G. , 1983. `The Buffer System in International Relations', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 27, no. 1, March, pp. 3-26.
52.
Record, Jeffrey , 1975. Sizing Up the Soviet Army. Washington, DC: Brookings.
53.
Rothstein, Robert L. , 1968. Alliances and Small Powers. New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
Rubinstein, Alvin Z. , 1982. Soviet Policy Toward Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan. New York: Praeger.
Skogan, John K. , 1983. `Norge i sovjetisk sikkerhetspolitikk', NUPI Notat, no. 280B, August. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
58.
Udgaard, Nils M. , 1973. Great Power Politics and Norwegian Foreign Policy. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
59.
US Senate , 1980. Perspectives on NATO's Southern Flank, April 3-13, 1980. Senate Delegation Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
60.
Vali, Ferenc A. , 1971. Bridge Across the Bosporus: the Foreign Policy of Turkey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
Vital, David , 1967. The Inequality of States. Oxford: Clarendon.
62.
Vital, David , 1971. The Survival of Small States. Studies in Small Power/Great Power Conflict. London: Oxford University Press.
63.
Wolfe, Thomas W. , 1970. Soviet Power and Europe, 1945-1970. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
64.
Zimmerman, William & Glenn Palmer, 1983. `Words and Deeds in Soviet Foreign Policy: The Case of Soviet Military Expenditures', American Political Science Review, vol. 77, no. 2, June, pp. 358-367.
65.
Ørvik, Nils , 1973. `Defense Against Help - A Strategy for Small States?', Survival, vol. 15, no. 5, September/October, pp. 228-231.
66.
Ørvik, Nils , 1984. `Canadian Security and “Defense Against Help” ', Survival, vol. 26, no. 1, January/February, pp. 26-31.
67.
Østreng, Willy , 1982. Sovjet i nordlige farvann: Atomstrategien, Nordflåten og norsk sikkerhet. Oslo: Gyldendal.
