Interdependence,Cooperation and Conflict: An Empirical Analysis

Abstract

The article presents the results of an empirical analysis of interdependence, cooperation and conflict. The results show a curvilinear relationship between these three variables. Interdependence is measured by four indicators: the politico-military, economic, institutional and diplomatic ties between nation-states. The structure of interdependence relations in the period 1950-60 is analysed by means of multidimensional scaling techniques. The structure of cooperation and conflict is measured accordingly. The conclusions from the analysis are: first, that the four aspects of interdependence are closely related; second, that the structure of interdependence is relatively stable through time; and third, that strong ties of interdependence are not only related to processes of intensive integration, but also to processes of intensive conflict. The results show that interdependence has the effect of intensifying relations among nation-states irrespective of their nature. It intensifies not only processes of cooperation, but also conflictual processes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aspen Institute International Group , 1984. Managing the East-West Conflict. A Framework for Sustained Engagement. New York: Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies.

Azar, Edward E. & T. N. Havener , 1976. `Discontinuities in the Symbolic Environment: A Problem of Scaling', International Interactions, vol. 2, no. 4, November, pp. 231-246.

Coser, Lewis , 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.

Coxon, A. P. M. , ed., 1981. The MDS(x) series of Multi-Dimensional Scaling Programs. Interuniversity/Research Councils Series, Report no. 51, January. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Coxon, A. P. M. , 1982. The User's Guide to Multi-Dimensional Scaling. London: Heinemann.

Gleditsch, Nils Petter & J. David Singer , 1975. `Distance and International War, 1816-1965', pp. 481-506 in Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association Fifth General Conference. Oslo: IPRA.

International Monetary Fund , 1982. Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Keohane, Robert O. , 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph S. Nye , 1977. Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

10.

Kruskal, J. B. , 1964: `Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis', Psychometrika, vol. 29, no. 1, March, pp. 1-27.

11.

Marer, Peter , 1972. Soviet and East-European Trade, 1946-1969. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

12.

Mill, John Stuart , 1971 [1848]. Principles of Political Economy, 7th ed. London: Longman.

13.

Richardson, Lewis A. , 1960. Arms and Insecurity: A Mathematical Study of the Causes and Origins of War. Pittsburg, PA: Boxwood.

14.

Rosecrance, Richard , 1986. War, Trade and Interdependence. Paper presented to the International Conference `Interdependence and Conflict in the International System', Groningen, November 1986.

15.

Schuur, H. Wijbrandt van, 1984. Structure in Political Beliefs: A New Model for Stochastic Unfolding with Application to European Party Activists. Unpublished dissertation, University of Groningen.

16.

Simmel, Georg , 1955. Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

17.

Singer, J. David & Melvin Small , eds, 1972. The Wages of War 1816-1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: Wiley.

18.

Snyder, Edward F. , 1985. `Deterrence: From Fear to Interdependence', Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, vol. 41, no. 9, October, pp. 40-42.

19.

Spence, I. & J. Graef , 1974. `The Determination of the Underlying Dimensionality of an Empirically Obtained Matrix of Proximities', Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 9, July, pp. 331-341.