The paper sees a recent increase in studies on peace ideas as a positive phenomenon, but suggests that scholars should concentrate their efforts on specific questions and on an inter-cultural comparative analysis of peace ideas. Goals, approaches, and problems of such comparative study are discussed on the basis of earlier works on (the history of) peace ideas. The need for comparative analyses is documented by the suggestion of several ways in which a comparative approach can contribute to and improve the quality of studies in this field. Five approaches to comparative studies are discussed: (a) descriptive, (b) typologizing, (c) testing an idea or a hypothesis, (d) application of a common denominator and (e) the method of question and answer. Finally, both practical and methodological problems encountered in such an enterprise are identified. It is suggested that the methodological problems of applying similarities/dissimilarities and of comparability itself will require considerable systematic effort if a common denominator applicable to peace ideas in different cultures and periods is to be found. This common denominator would enhance not only the comparative study of peace ideas but might equally well contribute to establishing the identity of Peace Research in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aho, James A. , 1981. Religious Mythology and the Art of War. London: Aldwych.
2.
Airaksinen, Timo & Martin A. Bertman, eds., 1989. Hobbes: War among Nations. Aldershot: Avebury.
3.
Airas, Pentti , 1978, Die Geschichtlichen Wertungen, Krieg und Friede von Friedrich dem Grossen bis Engels. Rovanniemi: Pohjois-Suomen Historiallinen Yhdistys.
4.
Archibugi, Daniele , forthcoming. `Peace and Democracy: Why Such an Unhappy Marriage?', in Vilho Harle, ed., European Values in International Relations.
5.
Armer, J. Michael & Robert M. Marsh, eds., 1982. Comparative Sociological Research in the 1960s and 1970s. Leiden: Brill.
6.
Baldry, H. C. , 1967. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Basu, S. K. , 1983. `The Two Interpretations of the Gita: Tilak's Karmayoga and Gandhi's Anasaktiyoga', Gandhi Marg, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 315-329.
8.
Bertman, Martin A., forthcoming. `Political Theory in Hobbes, Kant, and Hegel'.
9.
Bilimoria, Purusottama , 1982. `Mahathma Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore on the Authority of “Sruti” (Vedas)', Gandhi Marg, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 734-740.
10.
Brayton, Abbott A. & Stephana J. Landwehr, 1981. The Politics of War and Peace. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
11.
Brock, Peter , 1968. Pacifism in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
Brock, Peter , 1970. Twentieth-Century Pacifism. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
13.
Brock, Peter , 1972. Pacifism in Europe to 1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
Bull, Hedley , 1976. `Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations', British Journal of International Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 101-116.
15.
Bull, Hedley , 1977. `Introduction: Martin Wight and the Study of International Relations', pp. 1-20 in M. Wight, Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
16.
Burress, Lee , 1988. `A Comparison of Selected Old Testament Prophets and Gandhi', Gandhi Marg, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 135-148.
17.
Burtt, E. A., 1951. `The Problem of a World Philosophy', pp. 29-42 in Inge et al.
18.
Buzan, Barry , 1983. People, States & Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
19.
Buzan, Barry , 1984. `Peace, Power, and Security', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 21, no. 2, June, pp. 109-126.
20.
Collingwood, Robin George , 1980. The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Constaninescu-Bagdat, E. , 1924, 1925. Etudes d'historie pacifiste I. La “Querela Pacis” d'Erasme; II: de Vauban à Voltaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
22.
Donelan, Michael , ed., 1978. The Reason of State. London: Allen & Unwin.
23.
Eckhardt, William , 1972. Compassion: Toward a Science of Value. Oakville: CPRI Press.
24.
Eckstein, Harry & David E. Apter, eds., 1965. Comparative Politics. Glencoe: Free Press.
25.
Eriksson, Leif , 1988. Fred och fredsforskning - et försök till översikt. University of Gothenburg, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
26.
Fitzgerald, Ross , ed., 1980. Comparing Political Thinkers. Sydney: Pergamon Press.
27.
Gallie, W. B. , 1978. Philosophers of Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Galtung, Johan , 1975. `Peace Research: Past Experiences and Future Perspectives', pp. 244-279 in Johan Galtung, Essays in Peace Research, Vol. I. Copenhagen: Ejlers.
29.
Galtung, Johan , 1981. `Social Cosmology and the Concept of Peace', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183-199.
30.
Germino, Dante , 1975. `The Contemporary Relevance of the Classics of Political Philosophy', pp. 229-281 in Fred I. Greenstein & Nelson W. Polsby, eds. Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31.
Harle, Vilho , 1987a. `Has Peace Research Obligations to its Traditions', pp. 2-29 in Vilho Harle, ed. Essays in Peace Studies. Aldershot: Avebury.
32.
Harle, Vilho , 1987b. `On the Alternatives to War and its Functions', Current Research on Peace and Violence, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 131-143.
33.
Harle, Vilho , 1987c. `The Ideas of Peace and Order in Chinese Mohism and Daoism', pp. 109-128 in Vilho Harle, ed. Essays in Peace Studies, Aldershot: Avebury.
34.
Herz, John H. , 1951. Political Realism and Political Idealism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
35.
Hoffmann, Frederick , 1970. `Arms Debates - a “Positional” Interpretation', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 219-228.
36.
Horowitz, Irving Louis , 1973. War and Peace in Contemporary Social and Philosophical Theory. London: Souvenir Press.
37.
Hyslop, Thomas , 1984. `The Buddha and the Mahatma', Gandhi Marq, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 131-142.
38.
Inge, W. R.et al. , 1951. Radhakrishnan: Comparative Studies in Philosophy Presented in Honour of his Sixtieth Birthday. London: Allen & Unwin.
39.
Ishida, Takeshi , 1969. `Beyond the Traditional Concept of Peace in Different Cultures', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 133-146.
40.
Jasper, James M. , 1987. `Two or Twenty Countries: Contrasting Styles of Comparative Research', Comparative Social Research, vol. 10, pp. 205-229.
41.
Jha, Rama , 1983. `Gandhi's Encounter with Western Thought', Gandhi Marg, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 209-221.
42.
Kende, Istvan , 1989. `The History of Peace: Concept and Organizations from the Late Middle Ages to the 1870s', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 26, no. 3, August, pp. 233-247.
43.
Khanna, Suman , 1983. ` “Of Faith”: A Comparative Study of Gandhi and Marcel', Gandhi Marg, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88-108.
44.
Klaassen, Walter , 1978. `Development and Evolution of the Just War Theory', Peace Research Reviews, vol. 7, no. 6.
45.
Lange, Christian L. , 1919. Histoire de l'internationalisme I: Jusqu'a la paix de Westphalie 1648. Kristiania [Oslo]: Aschehoug.
46.
Lange, Christian L. & August Schou, 1954. Histoire de l'internationalisme II: De la paix de Westphalie jusqu'a congres de Vienne 1815. Kristiania [Oslo]: Aschehoug.
47.
Levine, Robert , 1963. The Arms Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Liu, Xiaogam , 1988. `Sartre's and Zhuang Zi's Views on Freedom', Social Sciences in China, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 93-111.
49.
Maitra, S. K., 1951. `The Gita's Conception of Freedom as Compared with that of Kant', pp. 348-361 in Inge et al.
50.
Maurseth, Per , 1964, `Balance-of-Power Thinking from the Renaissance to the French Revolution', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 120-135.
51.
Meinecke, Friedrich , 1984. Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d'Etat and its place in Modern History, tr. by D. Scott. Boulder: Westview Press. (Originally published in 1924, first Engl. tr. in 1957.)
52.
Nargolkar, Vasant , 1981. `Vinoba and Satyargha', Gandhi Marg, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 661-672.
53.
Northrop, F. S. C., 1951. `The Relation between Eastern and Western Philosophy', pp. 362-378 in Inge et al.
54.
Parekh, Bhikhu & Thomas Pantham, 1987. Political Discourse: Explorations in Indian and Western Political Thought. New Delhi: Sage.
55.
Parkinson, F. , 1977. The Philosophy of International Relations. London: Sage.
56.
Radhakrishnan, S. & P. T. Raju, eds., 1960. The Concept of Man. London: Allen & Unwin.
57.
Raju, P. T., 1960. `Introduction', and `Comparison and Reflections', pp. 15-41 and 306-379 in Radhakrishnan & Raju.
58.
Raumer, Kurt von , 1953. Ewiger Friede. München: Alber.
59.
Russell, Frank M. , 1972. Theories of International Relations. New York: Arno Press. [First published in 1936.]
60.
Schou, August , 1963. Histoire de l'internationalisme III: Du congrès de Vienne jusqu'à la premiere guerre mondiale. Kristiania [Oslo]: Aschehoug.
61.
Shaffer, Elinor S. , ed., 1981. Comparative Criticism, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Shaffer, Elinor S. , ed., 1984. Comparative Criticism, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Singh, Mohinder , 1986. `Gandhi and Schweitzer: How Alike?', Gandhi Marg, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23-31.
64.
Srivastava, Gita . 1982. `Mazzini and Gandhi', Gandhi Marg, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 734-741.
65.
Stawell, F. Melian , 1936. The Growth of International Thought. London: Thornton Butterworth. [First published in 1929.]
66.
Tandon, Vishwanath , 1980. `Vinoba and Satyagraha', Gandhi Marg, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 385-394.
67.
Tang, Yung-Tung, 1951. `On “Ko-yi”, the Earliest Method by which Indian Buddhism and Chinese Thought were Synthesized', pp. 276-286 in Inge et al.
68.
Targ, Harry R. , 1974. `Violence and Social Change: The Contemporary Relevance of Camus and Merleau-Ponty', Peace and Change, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 10-16.
69.
Ter Meulen, Jacob , 1917, 1929 and 1940. Der Gedanke der Internationalen Organisation in seiner Entwicklung I-III. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
70.
Tomasson, Richard F. , 1978. `Introduction', Comparative Studies in Sociology, vol. 1, pp. 1-15.
71.
Tully, James M. , 1984. `Review Article: The Pen is a Mighty Sword - Quentin Skinner's Analysis of Politics', British Journal of Political Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 489-509.
72.
Vagts, Alfred & Detlev F. Vagts, 1979. `The Balance of Power in International Law: A History of an Idea', American Journal of International Law, vol. 73, pp. 555-580.
73.
Wallach, Jehuda L. , 1986. The Dogma of the Battle of Annihilation: The Theories of Clausewitz and Schlieffen and Their Impact on the German Conduct of Two World Wars. Westport: Greenwood.
74.
Waltz, Kenneth N. , 1970. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press. [First published in 1959.]
75.
Wight, Martin , 1966. `Why Is There no International Theory?', pp. 17-34 in H. Butterfield & M. Wight, eds. Diplomatic Investigations. London: Allen & Unwin.
