What if space-based strategic defense, as proposed by the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), eventually works reasonably well and is deployed on both sides? This paper examines the properties of the global defensive system that could result from the interactions between the two opposing defensive systems. It is reasoned that this global defensive system could have the capacity to unintentionally and rapidly amplify relatively minor events to global catastrophe. At high states of alert, the global technological system would be difficult or impossible to control and this system could fail in a way that unintentionally initiates a catastrophic nuclear exchange. These dangers have not been adequately examined. This paper presents a framework for analyzing the catastrophic loss of control in such gllobal technological systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, Jürgen , 1986. `Offensive Capabilities of Space-Based Lasers', Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 17, no. 2, June, pp. 151-158.
2.
Bella, David , 1987. `Ballistic Missile Defense and the Possibility of Catastrophic Mistakes', IEEE Technology and Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 6, no. 1, March, pp. 4-9.
3.
Bella, David , 1988. `Fault Tolerant Ballistic Missile Defense: Defining Constraints', IEEE Technology and Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 7, no. 3, September, pp. 22-25.
4.
Bereanu, Bernard , 1983. `Self-activation of the World Nuclear Weapons System', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 20, no. 1, March, pp. 29-37.
5.
Blair, Bruce , 1985. Strategic Command and Control: Redefining the Nuclear Threat. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
6.
Bowman, Robert , 1985. `Star Wars and Security', IEEE Technology and Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 4, no. 4, December, pp. 2-13.
7.
Bracken, Paul , 1983. The Command and Control of Nuclear Forces. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Broad, William , 1985. Star Warriors. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9.
Carter, Ashton , 1984. `Directed Energy Missile Defense in Space', Office of Technological Assessment, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC, April.
10.
Carter, Ashton , 1986. `Satellites and Anti-Satellites: The Limits of the Possible', International Security, vol. 10, no. 4, Spring, pp. 46-98.
11.
Cohen, Danny, 1985. A Report to the Director, Strategic Defense Initiative, Eastport Study Group, Summer Study 1985, December.
12.
Everett, Robert , Defense Science Board Task Force, 1987. Defense Science Board Evaluation of Status and Plans of Strategic Defense Initiative, Congressional Record, vol. 133, no. 116, July 14, pp. H6292-H6294.
13.
Fletcher, James & B. McMillan, 1984. `Battle Management, Communications, and Data Processing (U)', Report of the Study on Eliminating the Threat Posed by Nuclear Missiles (U), February.
14.
Foley, Theresa , 1987. `SDIO Investigates Shootback Ability to Protect Orbiting Strategic Weapons', Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 127, no. 25, December 21, pp. 65-66.
15.
Gardner, Mark & W. Ross Ashby, 1970. `Connectance of Large Dynamic (Cybernetic) Systems: Critical Values for Stability', Nature, vol. 228, no. 5273, November 21, p. 784-784.
16.
Huberman, Bernardo & Tad Hogg, 1987. `Phase Transitions in Artificial Intelligence Systems', Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 155-177.
17.
Karas, Thomas , 1984. The New High Ground: Strategies and Weapons of Space-Age War. New York: Touchstone Books.
18.
Lebow, Richard Ned , 1987. Nuclear Crisis Management. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
O'Neill, Barry , 1987. `A Measure for Crisis Instability with Application to Space-Based Antimissile Systems', Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 31, no. 4, December, pp. 631-672.
20.
OTA , 1988. SDI Technology Survivability and Software. OTA-ISC-353. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, May.
21.
Perrow, Charles , 1984. Normal Accidents. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
Perry, William , 1982. `Advanced Technology and Arms Control', Orbis, vol. 26, no. 2, Summer, pp. 351-359.
23.
Rippon, Simon , 1986. `Chernobyl: The Soviet Report,'Nuclear News, Special Report, September 11, pp. 1-8.
24.
SDIO 1987. Report to the Congress on the Strategic Defense Initiative. Washington DC: Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, US Department of Defense, April.
25.
SDIO , 1988. Report to Congress on the Strategic Defense System Architecture. Washington DC: Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, Washington, DC, January.
26.
Shrager, Jeff ; Tad Hogg & Bernardo Huberman, 1987. `Observation of Phase Transitions in Spreading Activation Networks', Science, vol. 236, May 29, pp. 1092-1094.
27.
Smith, Jeffery , 1986. `A Risk Reduction Center Gains U.S. Support', Science, vol. 231, January 10, pp. 107-108.
28.
Stares, Paul , 1987. Space and National Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
29.
Waldrop, Mitchell , 1986. `Resolving the Star Wars Software Dilemma', Science, vol. 232, May 9, pp. 710-713.
30.
Wallace, Michael ; Brian Crissey & Linn Sennott, 1986. `Accidental Nuclear War: A Risk Assessment', Journal of Peace Research, vol. 23, no. 1, March, pp. 9-28.
