The Invasion of CTrenada,1983 and the Collapse of Legal Norms

Abstract

The military intervention of Grenada, October 25, 1983 came after years of increasing strain between the interventionists, especially the US, and Grenada. Justification for using force by the US and its Ca ribbean partners was based on 1) claims of undue increase in military power in Grenada, in comparison with other Caribbean states, 2) the non-civil libertarian and socialist character of Grenada's PRG gov ernment which brought it into close and increasing dependency on Cuba and the Soviet Union, 3) the use of force by Maurice Bishop and his NJM movement to obtain power, and 4) the brutality of his liqui dation. Also 5) the claim that the OECS organization was a bona fide regional organization operating within the scope of authority of article 52 of the UN charter. It thereby had the right to seek help from others in the fullfillment of their treaty obligations. The US in particular stressed this point plus, 6) the claim that the Governor-General invited outside assistance. Most international law scholars who ex pressed views condemned the action on legal grounds, but supporters claimed that the interventionists were within their rights based on the above arguments, plus the view that various human rights declara tions and treaties support intervention when human rights are violated, and that some treaties require it. This paper explores these claims and traces the relevant writings of scholars over several centuries, most of which refute the supporters' arguments. Interventionary policies are found to be illegal in the post WWII period, with Webster's classic argument that 'instant and overwhelming necessity' permitting 'no moment of deliberation' may provide an exception. The UN, OAS and OECS treaty provisions are ana lyzed and found to have been violated. Comparisons with other rescue missions are found inappropriate as a precedent. Finally, interventionist arguments based on human rights are refuted by examining all appropriate declarations and treaties, none of which are found to authorize enforcement action.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association, Section of International Law and Practice 1981. Report of the Committee on Grenada . Edward Gordon, Chairman, February 10.

American Society of International Law 1983 . Law and the United States Military Action in Grenada. Transcript of a Public Forum, December 1. Washington, D. C.: American Society of International Law and Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.

Bishop, William W. , Jr. 1971. International Law, Cases and Materials. 3rd ed. White Plains, NY: Prentice-Hall.

Brierly, J.L. 1963. The Law of Nations. 6th ed., New York, NY: Oxford University Press .

Brownlie, Ian 1963. International Law and the Use of Force by States . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cornell Law School 1970. Human Rights: Protection of the Individual Under International Law, Proceedings of the Fifth Summer Conference on International Law, June 18-20, 1964. Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman and Co.

Fenwick, Charles G. 1959. 'Intervention and the Inter-American Rule of Law ', American Journal of International Law, vol. 53, pp. 873-876.

Forsythe, David 1985. 'The United Nations and Human Rights, 1945-1985' , Political Science Quarterly, vol. 100, No. 2, Summer, pp. 249-269.

Friedmann, Wolfgang 1971. 'Intervention and International Law', International Spectator, vol. 25, p. 40.

10.

Friedmann, Wolfgang 1965a. 'Intervention, Civil War and the Role of International Law', ASIL Proceedings, pp. 67-75.

11.

Friedmann, Wolfgang 1965b. 'United States Policy and the Crisis of International Law', American Journal of International Law, vol. 59, October, pp. 857-871.

12.

Gilmore, William C. 1984. The Grenada Intervention. Bronx, NY : Mansell.

13.

Goodrich, Leland M. & Edvard Hambro 1969. Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents . 3rd ed., New York: Columbia University Press.

14.

Grotius 1925. De Jure Belli ac Paris. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

15.

Jessup, Philip C. 1948. A Modern Law of Nations New York, NY : Macmillan.

16.

Kunz, Josef L. 1947. 'Privileges and Immunities of International Organizations ', American Journal of International Law, vol. 41, pp. 828-862.

17.

Lauterpact, H. 1955. Openheim's International Law. White Plains, NY: Longmans, Green & Co.

18.

Lillich, Richard B. , ed 1973. Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.

19.

McDougal, Myres S. & Florentino P. Feliciano 1961. Law and Minimum World Public Order. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

20.

Moore, John Norton 1984. Law and the Grenada Mission. Charlottesville, VA: Center for Law and National Security, University of Virginia School of Law.

21.

Moore, John Norton 1984. 'Grenada and the International Double Standard' , The American Journal of International Law, vol. 78, January, pp. 145-168.

22.

Moscowitz, Moses 1958. Human Rights in the United Nations . Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.

23.

Paterson, Thomas G. , J. Garry Clifford & Kenneth J. Hagen 1983. American Foreign Policy: A History Since 1900. 2nd ed., Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.

24.

Russell, Ruth B. 1968. The United Nations and United States Security Policy . Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.

25.

Schwartzenberger, Georg 1967. A Manual of International Law. 5th ed., London: Stevens and Sons Ltd.

26.

Sohn, Louis 1983. 'Gradations of Interventions on Internal Conflicts', Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 13, pp. 225-230.

27.

Stone , Julius 1958. Aggression and World Order. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

28.

Thomas, AnnVan Wyned & A.J. Thomas , Jr. 1956. Non-Intervention, The Law and Its Import in the Americas. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University.

29.

Wells, Sumner 1947. 'Intervention and Interventions', Foreign Affairs, vol. 26, pp. 116-133.

30.

Wright, Quincy 1959. 'United States Intervention in the Lebanon', American Journal of International Law, vol. 53, pp. 112-125.

31.

Annual Report of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights 1978 . Washington, D.C.: General Secretariat, OAS.

32.

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Ten Years of Activities, 1971-1981, 1982. Washington, D.C.: General Secretariat, OAS.

33.

League of Nations Treaty Series 1929. vol. 94, pp. 57-64.

34.

United Nations 1948. General Assembly, Third Committee, Summary Record A/C.3/SR 89, 30 September.

35.

United Nations 1941. Security Council, 31 UN Doc. S/PV.

36.

United States 1965. Department of State Bulletin, vol. 50, No. 1283, pp. 133-143, address by U. S. Ambassador Plimpton to United Nations General Assembly regarding Principles of International Law and non-intervention. Also same vol., No. 1286, pp. 264-267 regarding speech to United Nations by U.S. Representative Kelly on sovereign equality.

37.

United States 1965. Department of State Bulletin, vol. 53, No. 1359, pp. 60-65, State Department Legal Counsel Leonard Meeker's speech regarding the Dominican interventions.

38.

United States 1983. Department of State Bulletin, vol. 83, no. 2081, December, pp. 67-68.

39.

United States Department of State 1983. The Larger Import of Grenada, Current Policy No. 526, (Bureau of Public Affairs) November 4.

40.

United States Department of State 1984. The Decision to Assist Grenada, Current Policy No. 541, (Bureau of Public Affairs) January 24.

41.

United States House of Representatives 1983. Hearings Before the Subcommittees on International Security and Scientific Affairs and on Western Hemisphere Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives 1983. 98th Congress, 1st session, November 2, 3 & 16, pp. 8-54 and 175-200.