The 'mirror image' — the tendency for citizens to attribute the opposite qualities to their own and a competitive nation — is studied through analysis of public opinion in the United States shortly after the onset of the Iranian hostage crisis in late 1979. The questions addressed in this study are (1) how quickly mirror image thinking can be activated, (2) whether mirror images apply to the leaders of nations as well as the nations them selves, (3) what types of traits play the most prominent role in mirror imagery, and (4) what factors predispose people to think in mirror image terms. Analysis reveals that mirror images were very common just one month after the seizure of the American hostages, that they were more commonly focused on the nations (Iran and the U.S.) than on the leaders of the nations (President Carter and Ayotollah Khomeini), that they Nere most often evaluative rather than simply descriptive, and, perhaps most interestingly, that they were expressed most frequently by more highly educated and more knowledgeable people. Discussion centers on the interpretation of these findings, especially the latter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bass, Bernard M. and George Dunteman .1963. Biases in the Evaluation of One's Own Group, Its Allies and OpponentsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 7 (March): 16-20.
2.
Berrien, F. Kenneth.1969. Stereotype Similarities and ContrastsJournal of Social Psychology, 78 (August): 173-183.
3.
Billig, Michael.1973. Normative Communication in a Minimal Intergroup Situation . European Journal of Social Psychology , 3: 339-343.
4.
Billig, Michael and Henri Tajfel.1973. Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology , 3: 27-52.
5.
Blake, R.R. and J.D. Mouton.1962. Overevaluation of Own Group's Product in Intergroup Competition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64: 237-238.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie.1961. The Mirror Image in Soviet-American Relations: A Social Psychologist's Report. Journal of Social Issues , 17: 45-56.
7.
Buchanan, William and Hadley Cantril.1953. How Nations See Each Other . Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
8.
Budner, S.1962. Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable . Journal of Personality, 30: 29-50.
9.
Christiansen, Bjorn.1959. Attitudes Toward Foreign Policy as a Function of Personality . Oslo: Oslo University Press.
10.
Deutsch, Karl W. and Richard L. Merritt .1965. Effects of Events on National and International Images, in Herbert C. Kelman, ed., International Behavior: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston .
11.
Doise, W. and A. Sinclair.1973. The Categorization Process in Intergroup Relations. European Journal of Social Psychology , 3: 145-157.
12.
Eckhardt, William and Norman Z. Alcock .1970. Ideology and Personality in War/Peace Attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology , 81: 105-116.
13.
Eckhardt, William and Ralph K. White.1967. A Test of the Mirror-Image Hypothesis: Kennedy and Khrushchev. Journal of Conflict Resolution,11 (September): 325-332.
14.
Edelman, Murray.1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press .
15.
Eldridge, Albert F.1979. Images of Conflict. New York : St. Martin's Press.
16.
Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani .1966. Knowledge and Foreign Policy Opinions: Some Models for Consideration. Public Opinion Quarterly, (Summer): 187-199.
17.
Hamilton, David L.1976. Cognitive Biases in the Perception of Social Groups , in John S. Carroll and John W. Payne, eds., Cognition and Social Behavior. Potomac, Md.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
18.
Haque, A.1973. Mirror Image Hypothesis in the Context of Indo-Pakistan Conflict. Pakistan Journal of Psychology (June): 13-22.
19.
Hermann, Margaret C.1980. Exploring Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24 (March): 7-46.
20.
Hermann, Margaret C. with Thomas W. Milburn .1977. A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York: Free Press.
21.
Holsti, Ole R.1962. The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution , 7 (September): 244-252.
22.
Holsti, Ole R. and James N. Rosenau .1979. Vietnam, Consensus, and the Belief Systems of American Leaders. World Politics , 32 (October): 1-56.
23.
McCauley, Clark, Christopher L. Stitt, and Mary Segal.1980. Stereotyping: From Prejudice to Prediction . Psychological Bulletin, 87 (January): 195-208.
24.
Mendelovitz, Saul H., ed. 1975. On the Creation of a Just World Order: Preferred Worlds for the 1980's. New York: Free Press.
25.
Merenda, Peter F., Torab Bassiri, Reza Shapurian, and Walter V. Clarke .1971. Iranian Perceptions of the Reza Shah, Presidents Nixon and Johnson, and the Ideal Self. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33: 428-430.
26.
Mueller, John E.1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
27.
Nincic, Miroslav, and Bruce Russett.1979. The Effect of Similarity and Interest on Attitudes Toward Foreign Countries. Public Opinion Quarterly,43 (Spring): 68-78.
28.
Nunnally, Jum C.1967. Psychometric Theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
29.
Ornauer, H., H. Wiberg, A. Sicinski, and J. Galtung, eds. 1976. Images of the World in the Year 2000: A Comparative Ten Nation Study. Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press.
30.
Osgood, Charles.1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender . Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
31.
Osgood, Charles, J.G. Suci, and Percy Tannenbaum .1957. The Measurement of Meaning . Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
32.
Rosenberg, Milton F.1965. Images in Relation to the Policy Process: American Public Opinion on Cold-War Issues, in Herbert C. Kelman, ed. International Behavior: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston .
33.
Ryen, A.H.1974. Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences of Group Membership . Paper presented at the American Psychological Convention annual meeting, New Orleans.
34.
Salazar, Jose Miguel and Gerardo Marin.1977. National Stereotypes as a Function of Conflict and Territorial Proximity: A Test of the Mirror Image Hypothesis . Journal of Social Psychology, 101 (February): 13-19.
35.
Scott, William A.1965. Psychological and Social Correlates of International Images, in Herbert C. Kelman, ed. International Behavior: A Social-Psychological Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
36.
Sherif, M., O.J. Harvey, B.J. White, W.R. Hood, and C.W. Sherif.1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
37.
Siverson, Randolph M.1974. A Research Note on Cognitive Balance and International Conflict: Egypt and Israel in the Suez Crisis. Western Political Quarterly,27 (June): 328-336.
38.
Siverson, Randolph M.1972. The Evaluation of Self, Allies, and Enemies in the 1956 Suez Crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution , 16 (June): 203-210.
39.
Snyder, Glenn H.1971. 'Prisoner's Dilemma' and 'Chicken' Models in International Conflict. International Studies Quarterly , 15 (March): 66-103.
40.
Streufert, Sigfried and Sandra Ishibashi Sandler.1971. A Laboratory Test of the Mirror Image Hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1 (October-December): 378-397.
41.
Sumner, William G.1906. Folkways. New York: Ginn.
42.
Tajfel, Henri and Michael Billig.1974. Familiarity and Categorization in Intergroup Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 10: 159-170.
43.
White, Ralph K.1970. Nobody Wanted War: Misperceptions in Vietnam and Other Wars. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday and Company.
44.
Willis, Richard H.1968. Ethnic and National Images: Peoples vs. Nations . Public Opinion Quarterly, 32 (Summer): 186-201.
