How does crime influence democratic attitudes and behaviors? Existing research offers conflicting answers: some argue that crime fosters antidemocratic preferences, while others suggest it increases democratic engagement. To reconcile this paradox, we conceptualize democracy as a multidimensional system with distinct components that can be decoupled. We distinguish between different (anti)democratic preferences tied to core democratic principles and argue that contextual exposure to crime may heighten support for undemocratic enforcement measures without eroding commitment to procedural democracy. To test this, we conducted a large online survey (N = 3108) in Brazil – a country profoundly affected by various forms of crime – using two embedded experimental protocols. Our findings show that crime exposure increases support for unlawful enforcement practices, such as police overreach and vigilante justice, while leaving attitudes toward military coups, executive aggrandizement and support for democracy as the best form of government largely unaffected. Understanding this nuanced relationship is especially important in contexts where crime is pervasive and politically instrumentalized. That exposure to crime leads citizens to tolerate breaches of the rule of law in the name of public safety is deeply concerning. Yet, our results offer cautious optimism: support for undemocratic enforcement does not necessarily undermine broader democratic commitments.
AlbarracínJ (2018) Criminalized electoral politics in Brazilian urban peripheries. Crime, Law and Social Change69(4): 553–575.
2.
AlesinaAMianoA (2023) Immigration and redistribution. The Review of Economic Studies90(1): 1–39.
3.
AlesinaAPiccoloSPinottiP (2019) Organized crime, violence, and politics. The Review of Economic Studies86(2): 457–499.
4.
AngristJDPischkeJ-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AriasEDBarnesN (2017) Crime and plural orders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Current Sociology65(3): 448–465.
6.
AriasEDRodriguesCD (2006) The myth of personal security: Criminal gangs, dispute resolution, and identity in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas. Latin American Politics and Society48(4): 53–81.
7.
BakkeKDahlMRickardK (2025) Conflict exposure and democratic values: Evidence from wartime Ukraine. Journal of Peace Research62(5): 1376–1392.
8.
BaliVA (2007) Terror and elections: Lessons from Spain. Electoral Studies26(3): 669–687.
9.
BarnesN (2017) Criminal politics: An integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics15(4): 967–987.
10.
BarnesN (2022) The logic of criminal territorial control: Military intervention in Rio de Janeiro. Comparative Political Studies55(5): 789–831.
11.
BatesonR (2012) Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review106(3): 570–587.
12.
BatesonR (2022) Voting for a killer: Efraín Ríos Montt’s return to politics in democratic Guatemala. Comparative Politics52(2): 203–228.
13.
BellowsJMiguelE (2009) War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics93(11–12): 1144–1157.
14.
BerensSDallendörferM (2019) Apathy or anger? How crime experience affects individual vote intention in Latin America and the Caribbean. Political Studies67(4): 1010–1033.
15.
BerensSKarimS (2024) Quotidian crime, wartime violence and public goods preferences: Evidence from Liberia. Journal of Peace Research61(4): 545–559.
16.
BermeoN (2016) On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy27(1): 5–19.
17.
BitencourtL (2007) Crime and violence: Challenges to democracy in Brazil. In: TulchinJRuthenbergM (eds) Citizenship in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 171–186.
18.
BlancoLR (2013) The impact of crime on trust in institutions in Mexico. European Journal of Political Economy32: 38–55.
19.
BlattmanC (2009) From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review103(2): 231–247.
20.
BonnerMD (2019) Tough on Crime: The Rise of Punitive Populism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21.
BoothJASeligsonMA (2009) The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
BreitensteinSHernándezE (2025) Too crooked to be good? Trade-offs in the electoral punishment of malfeasance and corruption. European Political Science Review17(1): 61–79.
23.
CaldeiraTPR (2001) City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
CaldeiraTPRHolstonJ (1999) Democracy and violence in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History41(4): 691–729.
25.
CallenMIsaqzadehMLongJD, et al. (2014) Violence and risk preference: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review104(1): 123–148.
26.
CanoIDuarteT (2012) No sapatinho: a evolução das milícias no Rio de Janeiro (2008-2011) [On the quiet: The evolution of militias in Rio de Janeiro (2008–2011)]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: LAV, Laboratório de Análise da Violência (LAV-UERJ).
27.
CanoILootC (2008) Seis por meia dúzia? Um estudo explloratóorio do fenômeno das chamadas ’milícias’ no Rio de Janeiro [Six of one, half a dozen of the other? An exploratory study of the so-called ‘militias’ in Rio de Janeiro] In GlobalJustiça (Ed.), Segurança, Tráfico e Milícias no Rio de Janeiro [Security, Trafficking, and Militias in Rio de Janeiro]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fundação Heinrich Böll, 16–24.
28.
CarothersTHartnettB (2024) Misunderstanding democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy35(3): 24–37.
29.
CarothersTPressB (2022) Understanding and responding to global democratic backsliding. Report. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
30.
CarrerasM (2013) The impact of criminal violence on regime legitimacy in Latin America. Latin American Research Review48(3): 85–107.
31.
ChancerLDonovanP (1994) A mass psychology of punishment: Crime and the futility of rationally based approaches. Social Justice21(357): 50–72.
32.
ChuJAWilliamsonSYeungESF (2024) People consistently view elections and civil liberties as key components of democracy. Science386(6719): 291–296.
33.
ClaassenC (2020) Does public support help democracy survive?American Journal of Political Science64(1): 118–134.
34.
CórdovaATiscorniaL (2025) Law enforcement at the margin of the law: information provision and support for militarization in Mexico. Journal of Peace Research62(5): 1428–1446.
35.
CostelloeMTChiricosTBuriánekL, et al. (2002) The social correlates of punitiveness toward criminals: A comparison of the Czech Republic and Florida. Justice System Journal23(2): 191–220.
36.
CozzaniMTriventiMBernardiF (2022) Maternal stress and pregnancy outcomes evidence from a natural experiment: The 2004 Madrid train bombings. European Sociological Review38(3): 390–407.
37.
CruzJMKloppe-SantamaríaG (2019) Determinants of support for extralegal violence in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Research Review54(1): 50–68.
38.
DahlRA (1972) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
DahlRA (2000) On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
DorffC (2017) Violence, kinship networks, and political resilience: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Peace Research54(4): 558–573.
46.
DowlerK (2003) Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture10(2): 109–126.
47.
DurkheimE ([1893] 2013) The Division of Labor in Society. New York, NY: Free Press.
48.
EastonD (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: Wiley.
49.
FearonJ (2011) Self-enforcing democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics126(4): 1661–1708.
50.
FeldmannAELunaJP (2023) Criminal Politics and Botched Development in Contemporary Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Flores-MacíasGZarkinJ (2024) The consequences of militarized policing for human rights: Evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies57(3): 387–418.
García-PonceOYoungLEZeitzoffT (2023) Anger and support for retribution in Mexico’s drug war. Journal of Peace Research60(2): 274–290.
54.
GelmanAHillJVehtariA (2020) Regression and Other Stories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
55.
GENI/IPPUR (2021) A expansão das milícias no Rio de Janeiro: uso da força estatal, mercado imobiliário e grupos armados [The expansion of militias in Rio de Janeiro: state use of force, the real estate market, and armed groups]. Report, Grupo de Estudos dos Novos Legalismos and Observatório das Metrópoles, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available at: https://br.boell.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/boll_expansao_milicias_RJ_FINAL.pdf (accessed 2 May 2025).
56.
GerberMMJacksonJ (2016) Authority and punishment: On the ideological basis of punitive attitudes towards criminals. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law23(1): 113–134.
57.
GonzálezYM (2020) Authoritarian Police in Democracy: Contested Security in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
58.
GundersonA (2022) Who punishes more? Partisanship, punitive policies, and the puzzle of democratic governors. Political Research Quarterly75(1): 3–19.
59.
HagerAKrakowskiK (2022) Does state repression spark protests? Evidence from secret police surveillance in communist Poland. American Political Science Review116(2): 564–579.
60.
HartnagelTFTempletonLJ (2012) Emotions about crime and attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society14(4): 452–474.
61.
HernándezE (2016) Europeans’ views of democracy: The core elements of democracy. In: FerrínMKriesiH (eds) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43–63.
62.
HernándezE (2025) Stability and change in European views of democracy. In: FerrínMKriesiH (eds) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy Revisited, 10 Years Later. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–78.
63.
HiskeyJMaloneMFTDiaz-DominguezA (2020) Authoritarian recall: Mexico’s drug war and subnational patterns of opposition to democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America12(1): 3–31.
64.
HollandAC (2013) Right on crime? Conservative party politics and ‘Mano Dura’ Policies in El Salvador. Latin American Research Review48(1): 44–67.
65.
HuguetCSzabó de CarvalhoI (2008) Violence in the Brazilian favelas and the role of the police. New Directions for Youth Development2008(119): 93–109.
66.
JohnsonD (2009) Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies. Punishment & Society11(1): 51–66.
67.
KarstedtS (2002) Emotions and criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology6(3): 299–317.
68.
KijewskiSFreitagM (2018) Civil war and the formation of social trust in Kosovo: Posttraumatic growth or war-related distress?Journal of Conflict Resolution62(4): 717–742.
69.
Kloppe-SantamaríaG (2020) In the Vortex of Violence: Lynching, Extralegal Justice, and the State in Post-Revolutionary Mexico. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
70.
KrakowskiK (2022) Adjustments to gang exposure in early adolescence. Journal of Peace Research59(3): 337–352.
71.
KrauseK (2014) Supporting the iron fist: Crime news, public opinion, and authoritarian crime control in Guatemala. Latin American Politics and Society56(1): 98–119.
72.
LangworthyRHWhiteheadJT (1986) Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology24(3): 575–591.
73.
LaterzoIG (2023) Progressive ideology and support for punitive crime policy: Evidence from Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Political Studies57(6): 999–1034.
74.
LessingB (2017) Making Peace in Drug Wars: Crackdowns and Cartels in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
LeyS (2017) Electoral accountability in the midst of criminal violence: Evidence from Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society59(1): 3–27.
77.
LeyS (2018) To vote or not to vote: How criminal violence shapes electoral participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(9): 1963–1990.
78.
LipsetSM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacyAmerican Political Science Review53(1): 69–105.
79.
LuJChuY (2021) Understandings of Democracy: Origins and Consequences Beyond Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80.
MagaloniBFranco-VivancoEMeloV (2020) Killing in the slums: Social order, criminal governance, and police violence in Rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review114(2): 552–572.
81.
MainwaringSPérez-LiñánA (2023) Why Latin America’s democracies are stuck. Journal of Democracy34(1): 156–170.
82.
Martinez BarahonaELinares LejarragaS (2011) Democracy and ‘punitive populism’: Exploring the Supreme Court’s role in El Salvador. Democratization18(1): 52–74.
83.
MasulloJMorisiD (2024a) Destroying criminals or enacting preferred behaviors? Public support for selective repression to fight crime. In: 120th APSA annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 5–8 September.
84.
MasulloJMorisiD (2024b) The human costs of the war on drugs. Attitudes towards militarization of security in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies57(6): 887–920.
85.
MasulloJMorisiD (2025) Short-term security or long-term democratic stability? Evidence from Ecuador’s war on gangs. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uafnr_v1 (pre-print).
86.
MerollaJLMeziniEZechmeisterEJ (2013) Delincuencia, crisis económica y apoyo a la democracia en Méexico [Crime, economic crisis, and support for democracy in Mexico]. Política y Gobierno20(3): 221–255.
NussioE (2019) Can crime foster social participation as conflict can?Social Science Quarterly100(3): 653–665.
89.
O’DonnellG (2004) The quality of democracy: Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy15(4): 32–46.
90.
PérezOJ (2003) Democratic legitimacy and public insecurity: Crime and democracy in El Salvador and Guatemala. Political Science Quarterly118(4): 627–644.
91.
PetersonRDKrivoLJ (2009) Segregated spatial locations, race- ethnic composition, and neighborhood violent crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science623: 93–107.
92.
PrzeworskiA (2019). Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
RobbinsJHunterLMurrayGR (2013) Voters versus terrorists: Analyzing the effect of terrorist events on voter turnout. Journal of Peace Research50(4): 495–508.
95.
RosenJDCutronaS (2021) Understanding support for Mano Dura strategies: Lessons from Brazil and Colombia. Trends in Organized Crime24(3): 324–342.
96.
RuedaDStegmuellerD (2016) The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science60(2): 472–489.
97.
RuggeriADaxeckerUPrasadN (2025) Political violence in democracies: An Introduction. Journal of Peace Research62(5): 1363–1375.
98.
SampsonRJLauritsenJL (1994) Violent victimization and offending: Individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors. In: ReissARothJA (eds) Understanding and Preventing Violence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1–114.
SchedlerA (2014) The criminal subversion of Mexican democracy. Journal of Democracy25(1): 5–18.
101.
SchedlerA (2015) En la Niebla de la Guerra: Los Ciudadanos ante la Violencia Criminal Organizada [In the Fog of War: Citizens Confronting Organized Criminal Violence]. Mexico: CIDE.
102.
SeligsonAL (2002) When democracies elect dictators: Motivations for and impact of the election of former authoritarians in Argentina and Bolivia. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
103.
SingerAJChouhyCLehmannJ, et al. (2020) Economic anxieties, fear of crime, and punitive attitudes in Latin America. Punishment & Society22(2): 181–206.
104.
SnyderRDuran-MartinezA (2009) Does illegality breed violence? Drug trafficking and state-sponsored protection rackets. Crime, Law and Social Change52(3): 253–273.
105.
SoaresLE (2000) Meu casaco de general: 500 dias no front da segurança pública do Rio de Janeiro [My general’s coat: 500 days on the frontlines of public security in Rio de Janeiro]. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Letras.
106.
TaiYHuYSolF (2024) Democracy, public support, and measurement uncertainty. American Political Science Review118(1): 512–518.
107.
TiscorniaLPérez BentancurV (2024) Dilemmas of substitution: Why the urban poor support punitive policing in a Latin American city. Journal of Urban Affairs46(8): 1623–1643.
108.
TrejoGLeyS (2020). Votes, Drugs, and Violence: The Political Logic of Criminal Wars in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
109.
TrellesACarrerasM (2012) Bullets and votes: Violence and electoral participation in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America4(2): 89–123.
110.
TrudeauJ (2022) Limiting aggressive policing can reduce police and civilian violence. World Development160: 105961.
111.
TylerTRWeberR (1982) Support for the death penalty; instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude?Law & Society Review17(1): 21–45.
112.
VidmarNSandersJHamiltonVL (2001) Retribution and revenge. In: SandersJHamiltonVL (eds) Handbook of Justice Research in Law. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 31–63.
113.
ViscontiG (2020) Policy preferences after crime victimization: Panel and survey evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science50(4): 1481–1495.
114.
VoorsMJNillesenEEMVerwimpP, et al. (2012) Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review102(2): 941–964.
115.
WolfS (2017) Mano Dura: The Politics of Gang Control in El Salvador. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
116.
ZallerJFeldmanS (1992) A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science36(3): 579–616.
117.
Zizumbo-ColungaD (2020) They must have done something! Socioeconomic status and citizens’ support for the victims of violence. Victims & Offenders16(2): 183–202.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
